Skip to Main Content

Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

July 19, 2021
  • 00:00Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 00:03is provided by Smilow Cancer
  • 00:05Hospital and AstraZeneca.
  • 00:08Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers,
  • 00:09with your host,
  • 00:10Doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:12Yale Cancer Answers features the latest
  • 00:14information on cancer care by
  • 00:16welcoming oncologists and specialists
  • 00:18who are on the forefront of the
  • 00:20battle to fight cancer. This week,
  • 00:22it's a conversation about radiotherapy
  • 00:23for lung cancer with Doctor Henry Park.
  • 00:26Dr. Park is an assistant professor
  • 00:28of therapeutic radiology at
  • 00:29the Yale School of Medicine,
  • 00:31where Doctor Chagpar is a
  • 00:33professor of surgical oncology.
  • 00:36Henry, maybe we can start off by
  • 00:38you telling us a little bit more
  • 00:40about yourself and what you do.
  • 00:42I'd be happy to, so I grew up in Jersey
  • 00:45and first came to Yale as a college
  • 00:47student about 18 years ago.
  • 00:50I stayed at Yale for medical
  • 00:52school and moved to Boston for two years.
  • 00:54And then I focused on public
  • 00:56health and I received an MPH
  • 00:57in public health at Harvard.
  • 00:59I then stayed there for
  • 01:01my medical internship and
  • 01:02returned to Yale about eight years ago
  • 01:06and after my radiation oncology residency
  • 01:08I joined the faculty about four years ago.
  • 01:10So as a radiation oncologist,
  • 01:12I specialize in helping patients
  • 01:13who have a cancer diagnosis to
  • 01:15figure out if radiation therapy
  • 01:17is the right choice for them.
  • 01:19I focus primarily on treating
  • 01:20patients with lung cancer as well
  • 01:22as those with head and neck cancer,
  • 01:24and I see patients in New Haven and
  • 01:26in Waterford and help to manage
  • 01:28their care throughout the course
  • 01:30of their radiation therapy and
  • 01:31really work with the surgeons and
  • 01:33the medical oncologists together as a team
  • 01:36to try to figure out what are the
  • 01:38best recommendations that we can
  • 01:40give for each individual patient.
  • 01:42Henry, let's talk a little bit more
  • 01:45about lung cancer and how it's treated.
  • 01:48I mean, for many of our listeners
  • 01:51there may be questions about
  • 01:53how exactly we decide
  • 01:55whether a patient should be
  • 01:58treated with surgery or with chemotherapy,
  • 02:00or with radiotherapy,
  • 02:02or with a combination of all
  • 02:05three or two of the three.
  • 02:07Tell us more about how those decisions are made.
  • 02:11It's a very complex discussion
  • 02:12we have often with the patients
  • 02:14as well as each of us from the
  • 02:17surgeons and the medical oncologists,
  • 02:19as well as the radiation oncologists.
  • 02:21We meet once a week at a lung
  • 02:23tumor board which is every Monday and
  • 02:25we get together and discuss any
  • 02:27situations that might be challenging
  • 02:29for us to to decide what the right
  • 02:32combination or treatment is.
  • 02:33The overarching goal though is to
  • 02:36be individualized with with how
  • 02:38we make recommendations and
  • 02:40to make sure that we're meeting
  • 02:42the goals of the patient as well.
  • 02:44So we want to really focus on that.
  • 02:47Primarily,
  • 02:47radiation is specifically a non
  • 02:50invasive and invisible as well as
  • 02:52very precise way of treating many
  • 02:54kinds of cancers and for lung
  • 02:56cancer specifically it is very useful in
  • 02:59multiple different kinds of contexts.
  • 03:00And it really depends a lot on
  • 03:03the stage of disease as well
  • 03:05as the patients status,
  • 03:06health status and goals.
  • 03:08So for example,
  • 03:10for stage one lung cancer,
  • 03:12when the disease is very localized,
  • 03:17we really often choose between
  • 03:19surgery and radiation therapy for
  • 03:22a patient to try to figure out
  • 03:24how best to cure their cancer.
  • 03:26So we've found overtime that
  • 03:28this technique called SBRT or
  • 03:30stereotactic body radiation therapy
  • 03:32serves as an excellent alternative
  • 03:34to surgery in certain patients.
  • 03:36We use a high dose of radiation per session.
  • 03:41Over just three to five treatments
  • 03:43using this very precise technique
  • 03:45in order to target these small
  • 03:48localized lung tumors and then to
  • 03:50try to eliminate them completely.
  • 03:52But for more locally advanced disease,
  • 03:54we had to make the decision about
  • 03:57whether or not we need to use
  • 04:01chemotherapy with radiation together.
  • 04:03Often we will need lower doses of
  • 04:05radiation each day and spread out over
  • 04:08multiple weeks of daily treatment
  • 04:11in order to to be able to treat
  • 04:14larger volumes of disease,
  • 04:15especially when the disease
  • 04:17has spread to the lymph nodes,
  • 04:19we still do this with
  • 04:22a curative intent most of the time
  • 04:24but sometimes we decide that there's
  • 04:26some situations where
  • 04:28chemotherapy first is helpful,
  • 04:30followed by surgery.
  • 04:31Other times we do chemo-radiation,
  • 04:34meaning chemotherapy and radiation
  • 04:35therapy together, and
  • 04:36other times,
  • 04:37chemo and radiation followed by surgery,
  • 04:39so there really are
  • 04:41multiple options that depending
  • 04:43on exactly where the tumor is and
  • 04:45how it's spread and what we think
  • 04:48each patient can tolerate in terms
  • 04:50of the treatment,
  • 04:51we often have to make
  • 04:53those recommendations and discuss
  • 04:55those options with each patient.
  • 04:59Getting back to where you started with early
  • 05:01stage lung cancer, stage one,
  • 05:04when you said well,
  • 05:07we need to make the decision
  • 05:09about using SBRT versus surgery,
  • 05:11it sounds to me
  • 05:14like many patients may opt for
  • 05:17SBRT if these two are equivalent.
  • 05:19Here you have radiation therapy
  • 05:21which is non invasive, painless.
  • 05:23Three to five days I believe
  • 05:26you said versus surgery,
  • 05:28which is clearly invasive.
  • 05:29Often will result in a hospital
  • 05:32stay and so are these
  • 05:34really equivalent or is one superior?
  • 05:42It's hard to say for sure.
  • 05:44We have not yet been successful as a specialty,
  • 05:49either surgery or radiation oncology,
  • 05:51at comparing head-to-head in a
  • 05:53randomized trial to be sure of
  • 05:55that answer about exactly which
  • 05:57patients are best for surgery
  • 05:59and which are best for radiation.
  • 06:01We do know that when you compare them
  • 06:03in terms of patients who receive
  • 06:06surgery and receive radiation therapy,
  • 06:08that those who have received
  • 06:10surgery often have
  • 06:11better outcomes than those
  • 06:13who had radiation therapy,
  • 06:14but we don't know if that's because
  • 06:17of the fact that patients who
  • 06:19get radiation therapy may not
  • 06:20always be candidates for surgery,
  • 06:23or may not be the best suited
  • 06:25for surgery either.
  • 06:26So that's why we don't
  • 06:29know for sure about that.
  • 06:31Typically, if patients can get surgery,
  • 06:33and if the surgeons believe that they can
  • 06:36take the tumor out
  • 06:39without causing too much of a
  • 06:41functional deficit,
  • 06:42meaning that your lung
  • 06:45function can handle our surgery and
  • 06:47that you as a patient can handle the
  • 06:50surgery and recover well from it
  • 06:52if it is expected that can happen,
  • 06:55then our gold standard still is surgery.
  • 06:57At this point, however,
  • 06:59we believe that radiation,
  • 07:00especially for those who are not
  • 07:03good surgical candidates, meaning
  • 07:05that surgery would likely lead to
  • 07:07a major issue with their quality
  • 07:10of life going forward
  • 07:11and that recovery may be too
  • 07:14much for a patient,
  • 07:15then we believe that radiation,
  • 07:17especially this SBRT technique,
  • 07:19does achieve very good outcomes.
  • 07:21We're still working on trying to
  • 07:23complete a clinical trial to try to
  • 07:26compare surgery and radiation therapy
  • 07:28for those who are eligible for either one,
  • 07:31but it is has been hard to get enough patients
  • 07:36on this clinical trial to answer
  • 07:38the question fully so far.
  • 07:41The clinical trial is
  • 07:43currently open and enrolling at the VA.
  • 07:49There have been other clinical trials
  • 07:54that did not have enough
  • 07:57patients to answer the question fully,
  • 07:59but when they combine the results
  • 08:01of those studies they found among
  • 08:04the patients that did
  • 08:06receive SBRT who were
  • 08:08also eligible for surgery otherwise
  • 08:10but did receive SBRT,
  • 08:13did have very good outcomes and
  • 08:15seemed to be just as good as surgery
  • 08:18in those small number of patients,
  • 08:21but we don't have enough patients yet on
  • 08:23one of these randomized trials to know
  • 08:26for sure if radiation is truly
  • 08:29a fully adequate alternative to surgery,
  • 08:32for those who can get surgery.
  • 08:38I know on this show I'm often standing on
  • 08:41a soapbox talking about clinical trials.
  • 08:44But if these two modalities truly are
  • 08:47equivalent, the only way that
  • 08:49we're going to in practice offer SBRT to
  • 08:52all patients is if we have the clinical
  • 08:55trial data that compares head-to-head and
  • 08:58demonstrates that they're equivalent.
  • 09:02And the signal so far is that based on
  • 09:05combining results of trials that
  • 09:08didn't meet their accrual target,
  • 09:10it looks like these two are equivalent.
  • 09:13But it would really be a tremendous
  • 09:16advance to avoid surgery in patients
  • 09:19we could offering them SBRT.
  • 09:23Am I correct in assuming that SBRT has fewer
  • 09:25side effects than surgery long term?
  • 09:29Are there side effects to the SBRT
  • 09:31as well that cause patients
  • 09:34difficulties in breathing
  • 09:36or reduced lung capacity and so on
  • 09:39and so forth that they should be
  • 09:41concerned about?
  • 09:42There are in the short term,
  • 09:45we believe that SBRT has
  • 09:47fewer side effects,
  • 09:48so often for patients who may be
  • 09:50older or have more other medical
  • 09:53issues or who may not be able to
  • 09:55withstand the recovery very well
  • 09:57from surgery in the short term,
  • 10:02we feel confident that SBRT has fewer
  • 10:05side effects in that short term.
  • 10:07However, as time goes by,
  • 10:09I think the other issue here is
  • 10:11long term follow up and long term
  • 10:13survival as well as side effects.
  • 10:15The side effects do accumulate
  • 10:18overtime and the more we learn about
  • 10:20SBRT which has been in widespread
  • 10:22practice for only about 15 years or so,
  • 10:26not as long as surgery has been around,
  • 10:28so we don't have as much long
  • 10:31term data as a surgery does.
  • 10:33But we know in that three
  • 10:35to five year period that
  • 10:37as you go further along in that period,
  • 10:40close follow up is really required because we
  • 10:42need to see how the side effects accumulate.
  • 10:46And sometimes they don't present
  • 10:48themselves for a couple of years
  • 10:50or a few years afterwards.
  • 10:52So we do want to watch closely for that,
  • 10:55because there can be side effects,
  • 10:57especially with lung function.
  • 10:59Overall in the lung function,
  • 11:01as inflammation occurs and
  • 11:02eventually scarring as part of
  • 11:05the healing process is that
  • 11:07ultimately,
  • 11:07we may see that the pulmonary
  • 11:09function may decline more gradually
  • 11:11overtime compared to surgery,
  • 11:13where the decline tends to be
  • 11:15a little on the sooner side,
  • 11:17so that's why it's really nuanced and subtle.
  • 11:22So there are some
  • 11:23differences there,
  • 11:24but both of them have their
  • 11:26risks and side effects,
  • 11:27and that's why we encourage our
  • 11:29patients to meet both the surgeons
  • 11:31and the radiation oncologists who
  • 11:32have stage one disease to really
  • 11:34determine what exactly is expected
  • 11:36for each individual patient.
  • 11:37The other thing about radiation, just as it is NOTE Confidence: 0.93686986
  • 11:40for surgery, is it depends
  • 11:42on where exactly within the lung
  • 11:44the tumor is arising from.
  • 11:47So if it's right in the middle
  • 11:49of the lung, far away from other
  • 11:52organs, then
  • 11:53the side effects may be less, however, if
  • 11:56the tumor is closer to the
  • 11:58esophagus or the airways,
  • 12:00or to the ribs,
  • 12:01you might see other side effects
  • 12:03that are beyond the lung themselves.
  • 12:06So for example,
  • 12:07if we get treatment very close
  • 12:08to the esophagus,
  • 12:10we might expect that we'll see some
  • 12:12more difficulty with swallowing
  • 12:13or painful swallowing, heartburn,
  • 12:15things like that,
  • 12:16and then if it's too close to the airways,
  • 12:19we might see some bleeding, more cough.
  • 12:23If it's too close to the ribs
  • 12:25or the chest wall or the back,
  • 12:28sometimes we'll see some pain that can
  • 12:30arise even a couple of years afterwards,
  • 12:32so it's not a benign treatment completely,
  • 12:34but the side effects generally
  • 12:36are well tolerated for
  • 12:38most patients.
  • 12:40And what about long term side effects?
  • 12:42I realized that you said that SBRT is
  • 12:45relatively new in the past 15 years or so,
  • 12:48but with other
  • 12:50cancers treated with radiation,
  • 12:52people are often told about
  • 12:54the possibility of secondary
  • 12:55malignancies and worry about that,
  • 12:57especially with scarring
  • 12:58that takes place and so on.
  • 13:00Is that something that patients
  • 13:02should be worried about in lung
  • 13:04cancer treated with SBRT as well?
  • 13:09It is something we counsel our patients
  • 13:11about and we don't know for sure if
  • 13:14radiation really leads to, in the lung
  • 13:16at least, if it really leads to
  • 13:18significantly increased risk of
  • 13:19other lung cancers down the road.
  • 13:21Because often when patients get one
  • 13:23lung cancer, it doesn't matter
  • 13:25what kind of treatment they get,
  • 13:27they are often more prone to other lung
  • 13:29cancers that we watch very closely for.
  • 13:32So if something comes back in an
  • 13:33area that was previously radiated,
  • 13:35we may not know if that was because
  • 13:38of the radiation, or because it
  • 13:40would have happened anyway,
  • 13:41but we do see that sometimes
  • 13:43where lung tumors do come up,
  • 13:45both in the areas where there was a
  • 13:48previous radiation as well as other
  • 13:50areas of the lung or in the body,
  • 13:52that really had nothing
  • 13:53to do with the radiation
  • 13:55so it is hard to know for sure.
  • 13:57But it's something that we
  • 13:59counsel our patients about,
  • 14:00that theoretical risk that
  • 14:02radiation can lead to a second
  • 14:04malignancy many years down the road,
  • 14:06but it seems to be less of
  • 14:08a problem for lung cancer
  • 14:10then it is for other kinds of
  • 14:11cancers like breast cancer.
  • 14:15We're going to take a short
  • 14:18break for a medical minute and
  • 14:20then come back and talk more
  • 14:22about radiotherapy for lung cancer
  • 14:25with my guest doctor Henry Park.
  • 14:26Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 14:28comes from Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:31promoting sun safety and
  • 14:33skin cancer screening in honor of
  • 14:35UV Safety Month. For information and
  • 14:37to learn if you should be screened,
  • 14:40visit yalecancercenter.org/screening.
  • 14:43The American Cancer Society
  • 14:44estimates that nearly 150,000 people
  • 14:46in the US will be diagnosed with
  • 14:49colorectal cancer this year alone.
  • 14:51When detected early colorectal cancer
  • 14:53is easily treated and highly curable,
  • 14:55and men and women over the age of 45
  • 14:58should have regular colonoscopies
  • 15:00to screen for the disease.
  • 15:03Patients with colorectal cancer
  • 15:04have more hope than ever before,
  • 15:06thanks to increased access to advanced
  • 15:09therapies and specialized care.
  • 15:10Clinical trials are currently
  • 15:12underway at federally
  • 15:13Designated comprehensive cancer
  • 15:15centers such as Yale Cancer Center
  • 15:18and at Smilow Cancer Hospital to
  • 15:20test innovative new treatments for
  • 15:22colorectal cancer tumor gene analysis
  • 15:25has helped improve management of
  • 15:27colorectal cancer by identifying the
  • 15:29patients most likely to benefit from
  • 15:32chemotherapy and newer targeted agents,
  • 15:35resulting in more patient specific treatment.
  • 15:37More information is available at
  • 15:40yalecancercenter.org. You're listening
  • 15:41to Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 15:44Welcome back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 15:46This is doctor Anees Chagpar
  • 15:48and I'm joined tonight by
  • 15:50my guest Doctor Henry Park.
  • 15:53We're talking about radiotherapy for
  • 15:55lung cancer and right before the
  • 15:57break we were talking about the use
  • 15:59of radiation therapy and specifically
  • 16:01SBRT for the management of stage
  • 16:04one or early stage lung cancer.
  • 16:06So Henry, you were mentioning that
  • 16:08radiation also may play a role in more
  • 16:11advanced cancers that are locally advanced
  • 16:13and not metastatic.
  • 16:15But one of the questions
  • 16:17that often comes up is,
  • 16:19sometimes we use
  • 16:21chemotherapy alone and sometimes
  • 16:23we use chemotherapy plus radiation
  • 16:24combined at the same time.
  • 16:26How do we make those decisions?
  • 16:30So that's a very good question.
  • 16:32We do that based on seeing
  • 16:34exactly where the disease has spread.
  • 16:36So if it has gone to the lymph
  • 16:38nodes that are still in the chest,
  • 16:41or if it's a very advanced tumor in the lung
  • 16:44that seems to be invading
  • 16:45other structures in the chest,
  • 16:47then that's often where we consider this
  • 16:49to be locally advanced but not metastatic,
  • 16:51meaning that it has not spread to other
  • 16:54organs throughout the body like the
  • 16:56brain or the liver or other areas.
  • 16:59So in that case
  • 17:00we still do approach this with
  • 17:03the intent to cure,
  • 17:05so we use some kind of combination,
  • 17:08typically of chemotherapy with radiation.
  • 17:10Or some kind of combination
  • 17:12of chemo with surgery,
  • 17:14with or without radiation, so for those patients
  • 17:17it really depends on
  • 17:20the similar features that
  • 17:23we look for in early stage lung cancer.
  • 17:26Given how much the patient can tolerate and what
  • 17:29they're willing to tolerate,
  • 17:31as well as the amount of
  • 17:34disease that needs to be treated.
  • 17:37The surgeons will weigh in about how much
  • 17:41lung would have to be removed in
  • 17:43order to do the adequate surgery
  • 17:46and we will weigh in about how much
  • 17:49the normal organs nearby will receive
  • 17:51radiation therapy and how much
  • 17:53we think the patient can take and
  • 17:56ultimately will be able to come up
  • 17:58with a recommendation about what the
  • 18:00best approach is to usually combine
  • 18:02at least two types of therapy and
  • 18:05sometimes three in order to achieve the
  • 18:07best outcomes.
  • 18:09In early stage lung cancer,
  • 18:11you talked a little bit about
  • 18:14deciding between surgery and radiation,
  • 18:16and I think we get the concept that
  • 18:19both surgery and radiation therapy
  • 18:22are local modalities designed to
  • 18:24treat lung cancer in the lung itself.
  • 18:27So one question that comes up is,
  • 18:30if my cancer is resectable,
  • 18:33say I've got
  • 18:36locally advanced lung cancer,
  • 18:38I'm going to get chemotherapy.
  • 18:40The surgeons say it's resectable.
  • 18:42Having you decide then whether
  • 18:45to add more radiation therapy or
  • 18:47whether to leave it with
  • 18:49the surgery alone.
  • 18:51Often we decide that we don't add
  • 18:53more radiation therapy afterwards or
  • 18:55we don't add radiation therapy at all.
  • 18:58It's a conversation
  • 18:59with the surgeon about whether or
  • 19:03not they think they can resect this
  • 19:06tumor after the chemotherapy.
  • 19:07Sometimes they may prefer to have chemo
  • 19:09and radiation together before surgery,
  • 19:11or they may prefer to have the
  • 19:14chemotherapy alone before surgery.
  • 19:15We used to do more
  • 19:18radiation therapy after surgery.
  • 19:20But like you mentioned before,
  • 19:22clinical trials being so important,
  • 19:24there's been a recent clinical trial
  • 19:26this past year that showed that
  • 19:28for those patients who had certain
  • 19:30types of lymph nodes or in certain
  • 19:32locations, that adding radiation
  • 19:34therapy after surgery may not be
  • 19:36as necessary as we once thought.
  • 19:38And so far the five year survival
  • 19:40numbers have just been released as well
  • 19:43for stage three disease and are at
  • 19:45least 10% higher than we've ever seen
  • 19:48in really any clinical trial.
  • 19:51Either involving surgery or not involving surgery.
  • 19:58I can't emphasize enough how
  • 20:00important these clinical trials are
  • 20:02to really moving the field forward.
  • 20:04Are all patients eligible for immunotherapy given that data?
  • 20:08Or do we look for certain biomarkers
  • 20:11to decide whether or not they
  • 20:14would be candidates for that?
  • 20:17Most patients are eligible for it
  • 20:19after chemotherapy and radiation
  • 20:21if they have stage three disease,
  • 20:24we may not always give it afterwards.
  • 20:26Depending on their response to
  • 20:28the chemotherapy and radiation,
  • 20:30so we'd require before receiving
  • 20:32that that we have another scan
  • 20:34that shows that there's not new
  • 20:36disease elsewhere already starting.
  • 20:38We'd also want to be sure that
  • 20:40patients have tolerated
  • 20:42the chemotherapy and radiation well
  • 20:44enough to start the immune therapy,
  • 20:47and there's other biomarkers like
  • 20:49PDL1 that are very helpful
  • 20:51in determining how likely the patient
  • 20:54is to respond to immunotherapy as well.
  • 20:57Right now we still do offer it even for those
  • 21:00who do not have the PDL1 marker.
  • 21:04But it may not be as helpful
  • 21:07in those patients as it is for
  • 21:10those who have a high PD L1 expression.
  • 21:12Given those data
  • 21:14than the fact that we offer
  • 21:16immunotherapy regardless of PDL1
  • 21:18status and the fact
  • 21:20that the clinical trials
  • 21:21have demonstrated that chemo,
  • 21:23radiation therapy followed by immune
  • 21:25therapy without surgery offers
  • 21:27tremendous survival benefits,
  • 21:28do we ever offer surgery to
  • 21:31stage three patients anymore?
  • 21:33We still do.
  • 21:35I think there's certain circumstances
  • 21:36still where we don't know what the role
  • 21:40is yet of surgery with immunotherapy
  • 21:43and if we still get good outcomes from
  • 21:46let's say, chemo with surgery afterwards,
  • 21:49or chemo and radiation, then surgery
  • 21:52and we'd save the immunotherapy,
  • 21:54which didn't really exist during
  • 21:56the time of the surgical trials,
  • 21:58then you know, could we still
  • 22:00get good outcomes from that?
  • 22:02We believe we may be able to.
  • 22:05We still don't have that clinical
  • 22:07trial data yet to prove that yet.
  • 22:09But as we move forward,
  • 22:11there's other trials that are
  • 22:13currently being considered right now about
  • 22:16combining immunotherapy with surgery as well.
  • 22:18And even in the earlier stage setting that's
  • 22:21I think becoming more and more
  • 22:23studied seeing
  • 22:26if that is going to be helpful and
  • 22:29and as the months and even
  • 22:31as the days and weeks go by,
  • 22:34new data comes out all the time
  • 22:36from clinical trials that changed
  • 22:38the way we think about the best
  • 22:40way of treating stage three lung cancer.
  • 22:43And so when we were talking about
  • 22:45stage one and even locally advanced
  • 22:47up to stage three lung cancer,
  • 22:49you used the term curative intent
  • 22:51and can you explain to our listeners
  • 22:54what you mean by curative intent and
  • 22:58what the alternative is?
  • 23:00The concept there is that we are
  • 23:03hoping to eliminate the tumor so
  • 23:05that it does not grow and come back
  • 23:08at any point in the patients life.
  • 23:10Are we always successful at that?
  • 23:12No, but we would approach it
  • 23:14with the intention of doing that,
  • 23:17and that's supposed to palliative
  • 23:19intent where the goal is to help with
  • 23:22alleviate symptoms that may come up.
  • 23:24For example, if the disease has
  • 23:27already spread outside of the chest,
  • 23:29we may be approaching the disease
  • 23:31more in that capacity in terms of
  • 23:34the treatments that we may offer.
  • 23:36However, in the past five to 10 years,
  • 23:39there's a lot of wiggle room in between
  • 23:42where we may not necessarily believe
  • 23:44we will completely eradicate the tumor
  • 23:47with any combination of therapies,
  • 23:49but that we believe we can extend
  • 23:52survival and extend Disease Control
  • 23:54for years afterwards,
  • 23:55and we're often successful at doing that and
  • 23:58that's often an important goal
  • 24:01for a lot of patients is to live as
  • 24:04long as possible and to turn their
  • 24:06cancer into more of a chronic disease.
  • 24:09And I think we're seeing that more and
  • 24:12more with the advent of immunotherapy.
  • 24:15Better combinations with surgery and
  • 24:16chemotherapy and radiation therapy,
  • 24:18as well as targeted therapy that
  • 24:20specifically targets certain mutations,
  • 24:22especially in lung cancer, that can often,
  • 24:24even if they are not specifically curative,
  • 24:27they may give patients multiple years
  • 24:29of extra life and time before they
  • 24:32require other kinds of therapies.
  • 24:34So when you say that,
  • 24:36I mean you're referring to stage
  • 24:39four or metastatic patients in whom
  • 24:44can still have many years of good quality of life.
  • 24:46Tell us more about the use of radiation
  • 24:49therapy in those circumstances?
  • 24:51More and more we're using it
  • 24:54because we're seeing such
  • 24:55improved outcomes from our
  • 24:57excellent systemic therapies,
  • 24:58meaning the chemotherapies and immune
  • 25:00therapies and also targeted therapies.
  • 25:02Radiation has an increasing role as well.
  • 25:05In stage four patients, we used to
  • 25:07be limited to alleviating symptoms,
  • 25:09which radiation is very effective
  • 25:11in doing over a very low dose
  • 25:14and a short period of time.
  • 25:16However, with this SBRT technique that
  • 25:18we've been using for stage one lung cancer,
  • 25:21we often use this in the metastatic setting especially
  • 25:25for those who have disease called
  • 25:28oligometastatic disease and what
  • 25:30this means is that only a few spots,
  • 25:32maybe one or three or even five spots,
  • 25:35may be present
  • 25:37outside of the lung and if we can
  • 25:40use either surgery or radiation,
  • 25:42some kind of local therapy to address
  • 25:45those areas after systemic therapy
  • 25:47has worked well for a patient,
  • 25:49then we may be able to really extend
  • 25:51their time without needing systemic
  • 25:54therapy and having good disease
  • 25:56control so it's something that
  • 25:58we're seeing improved survival
  • 25:59from clinical trials recently.
  • 26:01When you add radiation or surgery
  • 26:03in very selected populations,
  • 26:05meaning those who responded well
  • 26:07to their systemic therapy and
  • 26:09who have a limited number and
  • 26:12treatable areas where we
  • 26:14can use surgery or radiation,
  • 26:16these patients have
  • 26:21been able to live longer
  • 26:23than they would have otherwise.
  • 26:26We talked a lot in
  • 26:29this show so far about clinical trials
  • 26:32and historically people have always
  • 26:34thought that clinical trials were only
  • 26:37for patients who had no other option.
  • 26:40Patients who had stage four disease.
  • 26:42But it sounds like that clearly is
  • 26:45not the case and that
  • 26:48there are clinical trials that are offered
  • 26:51across various different stages to allow
  • 26:54patients to get the best therapies.
  • 26:56What clinical trials are currently
  • 26:58ongoing that you're most excited about?
  • 27:01We have a lot of clinical trials ongoing
  • 27:04right now at yield in lung cancer,
  • 27:06but specific to radiation we actually have
  • 27:08three right now for stage one disease,
  • 27:10so exactly the opposite of what we had
  • 27:13been used to seeing for clinical trials,
  • 27:15and that they're really often used
  • 27:18like you're saying for patients
  • 27:19as a sort of a last resort.
  • 27:21It's really the opposite for us,
  • 27:23where we're trying to approach this
  • 27:25to improve the standard of care
  • 27:28even more at all stages of disease.
  • 27:32So for example, stage one lung cancer,
  • 27:34we do have a two clinical trials
  • 27:37one that's currently active and one
  • 27:39that is about to open fairly
  • 27:41soon that look at the idea of SBRT with
  • 27:44immune therapy for stage one disease.
  • 27:46So half the patients will get the
  • 27:49standard of care, radiation therapy,
  • 27:50and half the patients will also
  • 27:52get immune therapy as well.
  • 27:54And that's our way of studying to see if
  • 27:57will get even better outcomes with SBRT
  • 27:59and with immune therapy and try to prevent
  • 28:02recurrences that happened
  • 28:03elsewhere in the body,
  • 28:05in the lymph nodes or elsewhere,
  • 28:06so I'm very,
  • 28:07very excited about those studies,
  • 28:09and I also have a study of my own
  • 28:11as well that looks at a clinical
  • 28:13trial that's looking at a fewer
  • 28:15number of sessions of SBRT for those
  • 28:17tumors that are a little closer to
  • 28:19the middle of the chest and trying
  • 28:21to make it more convenient and
  • 28:23for patients they only come in
  • 28:25three times instead
  • 28:27of five times for tumors that are
  • 28:29closer to the middle of the chest.
  • 28:32Henry Park is an assistant
  • 28:35professor of therapeutic radiology
  • 28:36at the Yale School of Medicine.
  • 28:38If you have questions,
  • 28:40the address is canceranswers@yale.edu
  • 28:41and past editions of the program
  • 28:43are available in audio and written
  • 28:45form at YaleCancerCenter.org
  • 28:47We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:49learn more about the fight against
  • 28:52cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:53Funding for Yale Cancer
  • 28:55Answers is provided by Smilow
  • 28:57Cancer Hospital and AstraZeneca.