Skip to Main Content

Role of Pathology in Cancer

October 11, 2021
  • 00:00Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 00:03is provided by Smilow Cancer
  • 00:05Hospital and AstraZeneca.
  • 00:07Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers with
  • 00:09your host doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:12Yale Cancer Answers features the
  • 00:14latest information on cancer care by
  • 00:16welcoming oncologists and specialists
  • 00:17who are on the forefront of the
  • 00:20battle to fight cancer. This week,
  • 00:22it's a conversation about the
  • 00:23role of pathology and cancer
  • 00:25with Doctor Angelique Levi.
  • 00:27Dr. Levi is an associate professor of
  • 00:29pathology at the Yale School of Medicine,
  • 00:31where Doctor Chagpar is a
  • 00:33professor of surgical oncology.
  • 00:36Angelique, maybe we can start off
  • 00:38by you telling us a little bit about
  • 00:40yourself and what it is you do.
  • 00:42So as a pathologist I am anatomic
  • 00:45and clinical pathology trained
  • 00:47so a PCP for short and
  • 00:50have received fellowship training
  • 00:52and in Cytopathology,
  • 00:55a subspecialty of the discipline.
  • 00:58I have also received some extra
  • 01:01training and expertise in GU pathology,
  • 01:04all of which I did
  • 01:06way back at Hopkins and
  • 01:10it's a combined program.
  • 01:13If you do both anatomic
  • 01:15and clinical pathology
  • 01:16it used to be five years and now is
  • 01:184 but you can do one of the two
  • 01:20disciplines for a little less time now.
  • 01:23And the anatomic focuses
  • 01:27mostly on the study of tissue
  • 01:30and working with a microscope,
  • 01:31fluids and cells,
  • 01:33whereas the clinical pathology focuses
  • 01:36a bit more on laboratory testing,
  • 01:39blood tests for example.
  • 01:41So let's dive a little bit more into that.
  • 01:44I mean, when we think about the role
  • 01:47of pathology and cancer automatically,
  • 01:49our brain kind of goes to, Oh yeah,
  • 01:52it's the pathologists who kind
  • 01:53of look at the biopsy and tell
  • 01:55me whether or not I have cancer.
  • 01:57Can you flesh out a little bit
  • 01:59more about what it is you do and
  • 02:01how you come up with that answer?
  • 02:03I mean everything hinges on what you say,
  • 02:07how much pressure is that,
  • 02:09and how do you actually come
  • 02:10up with the correct diagnosis?
  • 02:13It's certainly a team
  • 02:15from the very beginning,
  • 02:17patients will go to either a hospital
  • 02:19or a physician office and will have
  • 02:23a procedure done so the procedure
  • 02:25could be either a Pap test,
  • 02:29screening test for cervical cancer,
  • 02:31it could be a fine needle
  • 02:33aspiration of a breast mass,
  • 02:34or it could be a surgical procedure
  • 02:37in the operating room where
  • 02:39a tumor or an organ is removed, so
  • 02:43all of those tissues come to the lab from
  • 02:47those scenarios and in the lab, the
  • 02:51histology component is where that
  • 02:55tissue is transformed into a medium
  • 02:58where it is put onto a glass slide and
  • 03:03that process itself is quite intense.
  • 03:06We have pathology assistants who help
  • 03:09in the gross examination of these
  • 03:11tissues when they come to the lab,
  • 03:14especially the larger ones where they
  • 03:17may note sizes of lesions they may sample.
  • 03:21Areas that are critical,
  • 03:23close to margins, etc.
  • 03:25And those sections are then
  • 03:27submitted in cassettes and processed,
  • 03:30in an automated lab in a way that
  • 03:33they are sliced and stained and put
  • 03:37on glass slides for pathologists
  • 03:39to then review at the time of a
  • 03:43case review and in community practice,
  • 03:45often it is just a pathologist,
  • 03:47but here at academic centers we
  • 03:51have trainees, residents,
  • 03:52who are involved in that process.
  • 03:54We have many sets of eyes that
  • 03:58we call preview slides and then
  • 04:00the pathologist sits down at a
  • 04:02microscope to sign out.
  • 04:03And that's actually transforming as well.
  • 04:05Soon we might say we don't sit
  • 04:07down at a microscope to sign out,
  • 04:09but we may sit at a computer screen
  • 04:13if we transform into the digital era,
  • 04:16but we're not quite there yet.
  • 04:22Then with a microscope is where we
  • 04:26really do what we were trained to do,
  • 04:28and you use your trained eye to look
  • 04:32at the morphology of the tissue and
  • 04:35see where it differs from what you
  • 04:38have trained yourself to know what's normal.
  • 04:41So identifying what's abnormal
  • 04:43disease and in that then deciding
  • 04:47whether it's cancer or not.
  • 04:49So not every disease is cancer,
  • 04:51and it's important in some cases
  • 04:53where the presumption clinically
  • 04:54might be a mass because of cancer,
  • 04:56it's a really important piece to
  • 04:59be able to say this isn't cancer,
  • 05:01and so therefore no treatment is necessary.
  • 05:04But at a Cancer Center,
  • 05:06many of the referrals that come here often
  • 05:10perhaps already with a preliminary
  • 05:12diagnosis on a small biopsy of
  • 05:15cancer and then our job sometimes,
  • 05:17as pathologists, in a larger procedure, or a
  • 05:20resection is to then go ahead and stage that,
  • 05:24which means assign some more
  • 05:27parameters around that diagnosis.
  • 05:29So not only is it cancer,
  • 05:31but it's a type of cancer that
  • 05:34you want to kind of classify.
  • 05:37It's given a grade as we call it,
  • 05:40well differentiated, poorly differentiated.
  • 05:43It might be given certain
  • 05:46other parameters regarding size or margin.
  • 05:49Different cancers have different
  • 05:51parameters that are important,
  • 05:52and all of those details are important
  • 05:56in prognosis prediction and then
  • 05:58treatment and usually
  • 06:00associated then with outcome.
  • 06:03So I want to pick up on a few
  • 06:05things that you said there.
  • 06:06So one was this whole process
  • 06:09that really goes on that
  • 06:12many people who have never stepped into a
  • 06:15pathology lab might not know about which is
  • 06:17when you have a biopsy done
  • 06:20and your surgeon, your radiologist,
  • 06:23whoever has done the biopsy,
  • 06:25sends that specimen away.
  • 06:28Oftentimes, it's the greatest
  • 06:29amount of patient anxiety waiting
  • 06:31for that result to come back.
  • 06:34And sometimes it can take a few days,
  • 06:36but there is all of this
  • 06:39preprocessing that needs to go on.
  • 06:41Can you give us a sense of how long
  • 06:45these biopsy results can sometimes take,
  • 06:48and why it's important to really be
  • 06:51patient and wait for your pathologist
  • 06:52to give you the right answer because
  • 06:55as you say so much of treatment really
  • 06:58rests on what the pathologist says.
  • 07:01Absolutely, that pre-analytical phase
  • 07:02that you're talking about is a big part
  • 07:05of our processing in the lab and
  • 07:08that's kind of a traditional laboratory
  • 07:10setting where you know pathologists when
  • 07:13we talk about where do you work,
  • 07:15you work in the lab, well no,
  • 07:16we actually work mostly in our offices,
  • 07:18but much of what's happening
  • 07:19before we even see that glass slide.
  • 07:29An Accessioner is the first person in the
  • 07:32laboratory that basically does the
  • 07:34patient registration that assigns that
  • 07:38specimen a unique number.
  • 07:40Every specimen in pathology is assigned a
  • 07:42unique number and that's how we identify it.
  • 07:45The patient information,
  • 07:46clinical identifiers are then entered,
  • 07:49and that's a really important step in
  • 07:52terms of specimens being identified
  • 07:54properly and assigned to the right person.
  • 07:57That is the first thing that happens and
  • 08:00the next step is it goes to the gross
  • 08:05Histology bench and so for small biopsies
  • 08:09that are cores or maybe liquid,
  • 08:11or a pap smear,
  • 08:13just single cells,
  • 08:14fixation is something that
  • 08:16doesn't take as long,
  • 08:18so fixation is something that
  • 08:20happens in different chemicals,
  • 08:23alcohol and or formalin.
  • 08:26Now when these tissues are larger,
  • 08:29as in the case of a large tumor
  • 08:31or resection or a large organ,
  • 08:33that fixation process can
  • 08:37happen over a 12 hour period.
  • 08:39Sometimes overnight,
  • 08:40so for example,
  • 08:41a prostate that is removed whole
  • 08:44or a large breast excision,
  • 08:48those are examples of tissues that
  • 08:49take a long time to fix in formalin.
  • 08:52So before those sections can even be
  • 08:54taken to embed in those paraffin blocks,
  • 08:57that process has to happen,
  • 08:59and it's critically important for
  • 09:01that process to happen
  • 09:03because these tissues need to be
  • 09:06able to be examined in sections
  • 09:08in a way where the margins
  • 09:10and all of those distinctions
  • 09:12between things that are critically
  • 09:14important for patient care,
  • 09:16whether the person gets radiation
  • 09:18or not is the margin positive.
  • 09:21Those delineations are critically
  • 09:23dependent on that fixation step,
  • 09:25and that step is where we really
  • 09:28need to wait, and we can't rush it.
  • 09:30So we have some technologies,
  • 09:33microwave assistance and other things,
  • 09:35but in that process there
  • 09:39are still very manual
  • 09:41pieces that take time and then
  • 09:43by the time that slide comes out,
  • 09:47if the surgery was on a Monday,
  • 09:49that glass slide may not even
  • 09:51come to a pathologist's desk until
  • 09:54the following afternoon.
  • 09:56And if that following afternoon
  • 09:58is the first time a pathologist
  • 10:00is looking at a cancer,
  • 10:02whether it's a complicated case or even
  • 10:06a standard morphologic diagnosis of,
  • 10:09let's say, breast cancer, there are still
  • 10:11additional tests that will have to get done,
  • 10:14and so those tests will include
  • 10:16immunostains and other markers
  • 10:18that are all very important that
  • 10:20need to be included in the report.
  • 10:25So a lot of those those markers are
  • 10:28things that we have to then order,
  • 10:30and again it's another day
  • 10:33or overnight processing,
  • 10:34and so each of these steps
  • 10:37requires kind of another decision
  • 10:39and potentially another test
  • 10:42or stain or molecular marker, for example.
  • 10:45So important for people not
  • 10:48to rush the pathologist because as
  • 10:50I tell my patients,
  • 10:53everything rests on what they say.
  • 10:56But having said that,
  • 10:58many people nowadays are
  • 11:01talking about second opinions,
  • 11:03either a second opinion
  • 11:04from their clinician,
  • 11:05but also getting their pathology that
  • 11:08may have been reviewed at one institution
  • 11:10re-reviewed at another institution.
  • 11:12So for example,
  • 11:13if they get a second opinion,
  • 11:15their outside pathology is often re reviewed.
  • 11:19So can you talk about the importance of
  • 11:21that and how often do pathologists disagree?
  • 11:24I mean, are these diagnoses
  • 11:26things that are black and white?
  • 11:28That is pretty crystal clear when
  • 11:30you see a cancer that it's a cancer.
  • 11:32Or are there some nuances that
  • 11:34allow for some variability in
  • 11:36terms of pathologic opinion?
  • 11:38I'll start by saying second opinions within
  • 11:42any scenario are always a good thing.
  • 11:46I think for another set of eyes to
  • 11:48take a look at a cancer case is
  • 11:54always good and in the vast majority of
  • 11:57cases a confirmation is what you'll find.
  • 12:00The confirmation of the original diagnosis.
  • 12:04It becomes more important in certain
  • 12:07scenarios, so certain cancers
  • 12:10have required subspecialty training
  • 12:13that not all pathologists have,
  • 12:16where you practice,
  • 12:18where you've trained,
  • 12:20and what you've become an expert
  • 12:22in really does matter and standards
  • 12:24are different for different places.
  • 12:27In the community setting,
  • 12:28while there's very high
  • 12:30standards of care there,
  • 12:32they may not always see all of the unique
  • 12:36rare tumors that we might have in a tertiary
  • 12:40academic center.
  • 12:42Whereas in an academic center like Yale
  • 12:45we would be able to kind of explain a bit
  • 12:48more if there are nuances to a tumor.
  • 12:51So black and white,
  • 12:53yes cancer or not,
  • 12:54in the vast majority of cases.
  • 12:56But for challenging cases,
  • 12:58I think second opinions are definitely
  • 13:02helpful with expert review and consensus.
  • 13:05Daily Conference is something
  • 13:07that is part of our routine,
  • 13:10not always in all practices.
  • 13:12So it's important to kind of
  • 13:14understand the nuances of pathology.
  • 13:17We're going to pick up this
  • 13:19conversation right after we take a
  • 13:20short break for a medical minute.
  • 13:22Please stay tuned to learn more about
  • 13:24the role of pathology in cancer
  • 13:26with my guest Dr. Angelique Levi.
  • 13:28Support for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 13:30comes from Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 13:32where a dedicated team approach
  • 13:34is used to diagnose liver cancer
  • 13:36early when treatment is optimal and
  • 13:38new, more effective treatments are
  • 13:40being developed. To learn more visit
  • 13:45Yalecancercenter.org/liver
  • 13:48Over 230,000 Americans will be diagnosed with lung
  • 13:51cancer this year and in Connecticut
  • 13:53alone there will be over 2700 new cases.
  • 13:56More than 85% of lung cancer
  • 13:59diagnosis are related to smoking and
  • 14:01quitting even after decades of use
  • 14:04can significantly reduce your risk
  • 14:06of developing lung cancer. Each day,
  • 14:08patients with lung cancer are surviving
  • 14:10thanks to increased access to advanced
  • 14:13therapies and specialized care,
  • 14:15new treatment options and surgical
  • 14:16techniques are giving lung cancer
  • 14:18survivors more hope than they
  • 14:20have ever had before.
  • 14:21Clinical trials are currently
  • 14:23underway at federally designated
  • 14:25Comprehensive cancer centers,
  • 14:26such as the battle two trial at
  • 14:29Yale Cancer Center and Smilow
  • 14:30Cancer Hospital to learn if a drug
  • 14:32or combination of drugs based on
  • 14:35personal biomarkers can help to
  • 14:36control non small cell lung cancer.
  • 14:39More information is available at
  • 14:42yalecancercenter.org. You're listening
  • 14:44to Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 14:47Welcome back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 14:49This is doctor Anees Chagpar
  • 14:50and I'm joined tonight by my
  • 14:52guest doctor Angelique Levi.
  • 14:54We're talking about the role of
  • 14:56pathology in cancer and Angelique,
  • 14:58you know one of the things that you
  • 15:00mentioned before the break that I
  • 15:02was interested in is that you said
  • 15:03we are getting close to a
  • 15:06time when pathologists might not be
  • 15:09looking down the microscope anymore.
  • 15:11They might be looking at a computer
  • 15:13screen and that brought to mind
  • 15:16this whole concept of digital
  • 15:18pathology and potentially the role
  • 15:20of artificial intelligence in helping
  • 15:23pathologists make that diagnosis.
  • 15:25You talked a little bit before the
  • 15:27break about some of the nuances.
  • 15:29Can you talk a little bit about
  • 15:32where you see digital pathology and
  • 15:35the role of AI kind of playing
  • 15:37into pathology as we move forward?
  • 15:39Absolutely, the landscape is already
  • 15:44changing and the field is rapidly evolving.
  • 15:50And pathologists, I think are
  • 15:54definitely stepping up and wanting to
  • 15:58not just join this era of digital and
  • 16:03artificial intelligence as you say,
  • 16:05machine learning, but hopefully
  • 16:08also take a role in leading that
  • 16:11charge and for pathology there are
  • 16:14so many potential applications as
  • 16:16with everything AI is everywhere.
  • 16:19We don't necessarily appreciate
  • 16:21it from our phones and our apps,
  • 16:23or for many the interfaces we do each day,
  • 16:27but it's a tool no different
  • 16:30than for pathology,
  • 16:32maybe an immunostain and
  • 16:34molecular marker or genetic
  • 16:35profile and how we use that tool
  • 16:39is largely dependent on
  • 16:42what help or guidance a particular
  • 16:45practice might be looking for.
  • 16:48One example of AI and pathology as
  • 16:51you mentioned or alluded to would be,
  • 16:53helping to make a diagnosis
  • 16:56or grading a tumor.
  • 16:59So an area of study that I
  • 17:03have pursued in GU pathology
  • 17:06and in prostate cancer
  • 17:07this is a common application now
  • 17:11and there are already software
  • 17:15companies that are promoting
  • 17:19AI programs and software that can
  • 17:23reliably help predict grades or
  • 17:26Gleason scoring of prostate cancer.
  • 17:29But it's not that simple.
  • 17:34Depending on the cancers that might be
  • 17:38seen in a given institution,
  • 17:40whether it's more common,
  • 17:43lower grade, or in a tertiary care center,
  • 17:46much more complicated,
  • 17:48higher grade,
  • 17:49algorithms are kind of taught to
  • 17:52answer a specific question or grade.
  • 17:55So if you're looking for well differentiated
  • 17:58prostate cancer 3 + 3 Gleason score,
  • 18:01that might be one training set,
  • 18:04whereas if you're looking for
  • 18:07high grade prostate cancer,
  • 18:09that is
  • 18:11amenable not to resection,
  • 18:13but further treatment,
  • 18:14that might be another training
  • 18:17software kind of algorithm,
  • 18:18so much depends on
  • 18:21the question being asked,
  • 18:22and it's not just help in grading,
  • 18:24but it could also just be help in detection,
  • 18:28so different programs can be
  • 18:31taught how to do different tasks,
  • 18:34and another program might be in
  • 18:37a better setting for community
  • 18:39practice not to miss cancer
  • 18:42as much as
  • 18:44focusing on the grade because
  • 18:47detection and preventing false
  • 18:49negatives would really be the key
  • 18:53perhaps in a Community setting
  • 18:54with a lower cancer rate,
  • 18:56whereas at the tertiary setting something
  • 18:59that would be more helpful is perhaps
  • 19:03an AI software algorithm that not
  • 19:06just helps with detection or grade,
  • 19:09but maybe with prognosis.
  • 19:10And that's really the key,
  • 19:13trying to discern what this AI can help
  • 19:16with and how we'd like to apply it,
  • 19:21tailoring the solution to the problem.
  • 19:22But one of the questions is this.
  • 19:26Are these technologies in use now?
  • 19:28And is there a way for patients to
  • 19:31know whether a particular pathology
  • 19:33department is using that or not?
  • 19:35For example,
  • 19:36if I just had a biopsy at my
  • 19:39Community Hospital and I want to make
  • 19:42sure that they didn't miss a cancer,
  • 19:44should I expect that they have that kind of
  • 19:48technology that can help the pathologists?
  • 19:51And if I'm not sure,
  • 19:52is there a way to find out?
  • 19:54There's always a way to find
  • 19:56out and certainly just calling that
  • 19:58pathologist on the bottom of the
  • 20:00report would be the first step.
  • 20:05Or wherever those procedures are done would
  • 20:07certainly know within the department,
  • 20:09I would say we're still on the cusp.
  • 20:18I think right now in tertiary care centers,
  • 20:22there are many kinds of testing and
  • 20:25research scenarios and these
  • 20:27are all kind of sprouting
  • 20:30up now and it's not to
  • 20:33be expected I would say because
  • 20:36it requires so much investment and
  • 20:39infrastructure.
  • 20:47Whether it's cloud based
  • 20:51memory or machine or human time,
  • 20:55we can't expect that to all be there.
  • 20:58Now I would say you know,
  • 21:01in the future 5 to 10 years,
  • 21:0410 to 15 years, I think
  • 21:05then we can start
  • 21:07to see where these
  • 21:10applications are best suited,
  • 21:12and imagine with all of this investment
  • 21:17it would probably be helpful as a QC measure.
  • 21:21You know there are always reimbursement
  • 21:24codes for things that are additive,
  • 21:27whether it's a stain or
  • 21:29whether it's AI assisted.
  • 21:30So I imagine in the future it would also be
  • 21:33part of a report and so you know we're not
  • 21:37there yet, but it does take a lot of time,
  • 21:40infrastructure,
  • 21:40and money frankly,
  • 21:42and so until those costs come
  • 21:45down or those partnerships are
  • 21:47established, things
  • 21:49may be commercially available
  • 21:53at a price that is affordable for you.
  • 22:04The other thing that is here now
  • 22:08more and more in the cancer world is
  • 22:10this whole concept of personalized
  • 22:12medicine and so many clinicians are
  • 22:15really now trying to unlock and
  • 22:18understand the genomics of cancers.
  • 22:20And we've certainly had guests on this
  • 22:22show who talk about doing stains that
  • 22:25look at a number of different
  • 22:28genetic and genomic mutations that
  • 22:31actually help in figuring out how
  • 22:34a particular tumor may be treated.
  • 22:37Is that done at the local pathology lab?
  • 22:40What's the role of the pathologist in that?
  • 22:43How do you decide which of these
  • 22:46markers really needs to be done?
  • 22:48What's the cost and is that standard
  • 22:51of care or is that something that
  • 22:54patients need to really individualize?
  • 22:57So at the local level I don't
  • 23:00think it's necessarily standard of care.
  • 23:03Certainly immunostains,
  • 23:09certain markers that are common
  • 23:12to lay folks would be,
  • 23:15we talk about estrogen and progesterone
  • 23:17receptors for breast cancer.
  • 23:18For example, ER,
  • 23:20PR and certain molecular markers.
  • 23:22I think in Community practice
  • 23:25the idea is
  • 23:27to partner often with
  • 23:29another lab.
  • 23:31Whether it's a tertiary center,
  • 23:33a commercial lab that offers those
  • 23:36tests because they are not able to
  • 23:39have access to all of that in house,
  • 23:42and so a lab like
  • 23:45ours comes into play,
  • 23:47where if we have something to offer,
  • 23:50we can partner with other network hospitals,
  • 23:54community hospitals,
  • 23:55even other labs that might not have
  • 23:58the same volume we do in a Cancer
  • 24:00Center to provide all of these highly
  • 24:03specialized tests that without a certain
  • 24:05volume it's not affordable to run.
  • 24:08So I think the same thing holds for
  • 24:12additional molecular assays.
  • 24:15Panel genetic profiling those are highly
  • 24:20specialized areas and fields that
  • 24:23without partnering with another kind
  • 24:26of tertiary care center or larger
  • 24:29lab specifically geared towards that,
  • 24:32I think it's not
  • 24:34expected at the local level.
  • 24:36So are the decisions about what
  • 24:39additional tests need to be done,
  • 24:41so additional molecular
  • 24:42tests and so on, EGFR VEGF,
  • 24:45various mutational panels
  • 24:46and so on are those decisions
  • 24:50made by the pathologist, by the
  • 24:53treating clinician, by a group?
  • 24:56How are those decided?
  • 24:58I think in the Community level
  • 25:01the oncologist drives a lot of that because
  • 25:04the oncologist sees on that leading edge
  • 25:06what the potential drugs that are
  • 25:10available that are targeted to a
  • 25:14particular molecular change, and so in
  • 25:17the Community setting,
  • 25:19I think the oncologist takes that
  • 25:22role more so in asking a pathologist,
  • 25:25hey, there's a new drug and it targets
  • 25:29this molecular marker.
  • 25:30Is that something you do in your lab?
  • 25:34Or is it something we can send out for?
  • 25:35And then you know,
  • 25:37the pathologist facilitates that.
  • 25:38And so that I think happens
  • 25:40more on the Community side,
  • 25:42whereas I think in the tertiary care setting,
  • 25:45like here,
  • 25:45I think it is a bit more of a
  • 25:48collaborative effort because there
  • 25:50are there are the pathologists
  • 25:54here who are doing those genetic tests
  • 25:56and so we also have our tumor boards
  • 25:59that while they have been outside
  • 26:01at the Community level as well,
  • 26:03I think in a Cancer Center,
  • 26:05the tumor boards really are
  • 26:07putting everyone at the table.
  • 26:09Who has that subspecialty expertise?
  • 26:12And so I think it's a bit more
  • 26:13of a collaborative effort.
  • 26:15And if there's something that is
  • 26:18clinically warranted or a new drug,
  • 26:21I think the pathologists here in a
  • 26:25tertiary center are able to create
  • 26:28these answers to some of
  • 26:30those questions or research them,
  • 26:32or they're already a line of research here
  • 26:35in the department or collectively.
  • 26:41Which segues nicely into you,
  • 26:44know, one of my last questions,
  • 26:45which is what are the exciting areas of
  • 26:48research in pathology and cancer?
  • 26:50I mean, it seems like pathology
  • 26:53is so central to what we do.
  • 26:56Are there some exciting developments
  • 26:58that you see coming down the Pike
  • 27:00in terms of pathology and cancer?
  • 27:03Well, I definitely think the
  • 27:06digital pathology component and
  • 27:09the artificial intelligence piece
  • 27:11is very exciting.
  • 27:14It's entirely a new platform
  • 27:16and revolution, so to speak.
  • 27:18It's something that can be applied
  • 27:20to all of the tools that we have
  • 27:23and then it's a tool on its own.
  • 27:25So what I mean by that is the
  • 27:29ability to work with digital images,
  • 27:33whether it's radiology or
  • 27:36scanned pathology slide and
  • 27:39with that scan slide use metrics or
  • 27:44segmentation to detect changes
  • 27:47that maybe even the human eye can't.
  • 27:50And maybe it's not just about morphology,
  • 27:53it's just a whole other level
  • 27:56of detection
  • 27:58in addition to our molecular
  • 28:01assays and genetic profiles,
  • 28:03is something that can on its own be
  • 28:06additive and the exciting pieces when it
  • 28:09is also its own prognostic indicator,
  • 28:12and so we're always interested in
  • 28:15knowing more about the meaning of
  • 28:17the cancer and what effect
  • 28:19that has on outcome and prognosis,
  • 28:22and AI really has the potential
  • 28:24to help each of these special
  • 28:28techniques that we use and the
  • 28:30ability to stand on its own.
  • 28:32Doctor Angelique Levi is an
  • 28:34associate professor of pathology
  • 28:36at the Yale School of Medicine.
  • 28:38If you have questions,
  • 28:39the address is cancer
  • 28:40Answers at yale.edu and past editions of
  • 28:43the program are available in audio and
  • 28:47written form at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 28:48We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:51learn more about the fight against
  • 28:53cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:54Funding for Yale Cancer
  • 28:56Answers is provided by Smilow
  • 28:57Cancer Hospital and AstraZeneca.