Skip to Main Content

Smilow Shares: Kidney Cancer

April 01, 2022
  • 00:00Sugar I'm a professor of
  • 00:02medicine in medical oncology.
  • 00:04I see patients with kidney and
  • 00:06skin cancers wanna thank you all
  • 00:08for joining us tonight we have
  • 00:10a wonderful panel of speakers.
  • 00:12You're going to talk to us specifically.
  • 00:13Bad kidney cancer. We
  • 00:17will have 4 presentations total
  • 00:20and after that there'll be some
  • 00:21time for questions and answers.
  • 00:23If you have any questions feel free
  • 00:25to put them in the chat and we will.
  • 00:28We will try to answer them at the end of
  • 00:31each session to the best of our ability.
  • 00:34So we have four of the four speakers.
  • 00:38I'm going to start introducing by
  • 00:39introducing the first speaker.
  • 00:41It's doctor Patrick Kenny.
  • 00:42He is one of our urologic surgeons
  • 00:45and he's going to talk to us about
  • 00:47surgical approaches to kidney cancer.
  • 00:49So Pat take it away.
  • 00:54Thank you so much Mary.
  • 00:55It's a pleasure to be here with everybody
  • 00:57and as Doctor Krueger mentioned,
  • 01:00I think we'll be taking some questions
  • 01:03at the end and as a surgeon.
  • 01:05I have the pleasure of helping take
  • 01:09care of patients throughout a variety.
  • 01:13Of different parts of their cancer journey,
  • 01:16but also throughout a variety of
  • 01:18different kind of kidney cancer problems.
  • 01:21So I think it'd be really helpful to kind
  • 01:24of first talk about some patient resources,
  • 01:26but then also to review a little bit
  • 01:29just about kind of kidney cancer.
  • 01:31101 and we'll talk about we
  • 01:33call localized kidney cancers.
  • 01:35That's kidney cancer.
  • 01:36That's in in the kidney itself,
  • 01:38as well as the role for surgery.
  • 01:41To kind of more advanced or
  • 01:43higher risk cancers.
  • 01:48So some patient resources
  • 01:49I think are excellent.
  • 01:50There's a group called the
  • 01:52Kidney Cancer Association.
  • 01:53If you're not familiar,
  • 01:54it's a really fantastic
  • 01:56organization. The URL is
  • 01:59www.kidneycancer.org.
  • 02:00They have fantastic patient resources,
  • 02:03very good pamphlets, information, blogs.
  • 02:07There's some great videos as well
  • 02:09as the ability to to really kind
  • 02:12of getting in touch and be part
  • 02:14of the kidney cancer community.
  • 02:16The Urology Care Foundation also
  • 02:18has some excellent resources at
  • 02:21urologyhealth.org, in particular,
  • 02:22this kidney cancer patient guide,
  • 02:24I think is a very good and brief review,
  • 02:28so I do have some kind of this is a
  • 02:31a picture of a of a biopsy specimen
  • 02:33of a benign tumor of the kidney,
  • 02:36and I think one of the most important
  • 02:38things for patients to know is that
  • 02:39if you're diagnosed or if a patient
  • 02:41is diagnosed with a mass of the
  • 02:43kidney or a tumor of the kidney,
  • 02:44it's not necessarily cancer.
  • 02:47About 7% of kidney tumors or
  • 02:50something called an oncocytoma,
  • 02:51which is a benign tumor of the kidney.
  • 02:54Although it's difficult to distinguish
  • 02:55on biopsy from some kidney cancers,
  • 02:58they're quite common and I see
  • 02:59them a lot in my practice.
  • 03:01They're very often treated it because on
  • 03:03imaging they can look very much like a
  • 03:06kidney cancer at the bottom of the screen.
  • 03:08Here is something called an angiomyolipoma,
  • 03:10and this is a fat containing
  • 03:12tumor of the kidney.
  • 03:14I highlighted it in yellow,
  • 03:15'cause it could be a little
  • 03:16bit difficult to see.
  • 03:17Because it's near the the fat
  • 03:20that's normally around the kidney,
  • 03:22the vast majority of these are benign.
  • 03:24They're they don't spread elsewhere,
  • 03:26but they can bleed,
  • 03:27so we often do treat them for that reason,
  • 03:30but important to keep in mind that
  • 03:32kidney tumor does not necessarily
  • 03:35mean kidney cancer.
  • 03:36Now the majority of the kidney
  • 03:38tumors we see are cancer.
  • 03:40About 90% of the malignant or
  • 03:42cancerous tumors of the kidney,
  • 03:44or something called renal cell carcinoma.
  • 03:46That's a family, really.
  • 03:48A family of kidney cancers that are
  • 03:51all separate distinct tumors that
  • 03:53arise from different kind of different
  • 03:56parts of what's called the nephron.
  • 03:58The functional unit of the kidney,
  • 04:00about 5% of malignant kidney tumors
  • 04:02are what's called urothelial cancer.
  • 04:04That's the same type of cancer.
  • 04:06That impacts the bladder.
  • 04:07It really arises from the lining
  • 04:09of the urinary tract,
  • 04:10which you can see here,
  • 04:11which is this tan kind of urine
  • 04:14collecting system and only about 1%
  • 04:18of malignant or cancerous tumors of
  • 04:20the kidney or tumors that have spread
  • 04:22to the kidney from another location.
  • 04:24We can see it from cancer,
  • 04:26a cancer called Melanoma or breast cancers,
  • 04:29lung cancers,
  • 04:30and the most common other cancer that
  • 04:34spreads to the kidney is lymphoma.
  • 04:36But the focus of what we're speaking
  • 04:38about tonight really is renal cell carcinoma.
  • 04:41That family of related tumors that
  • 04:43arise from what's called the nephron.
  • 04:46This represents about 4% of new
  • 04:48kidney of new cancers in the
  • 04:50United States last year,
  • 04:52about 76,000 patients across the
  • 04:54United States were diagnosed with
  • 04:56kidney cancer and about 14,000
  • 04:58patients died of kidney cancer
  • 05:00last year in the United States
  • 05:02over their lifetimes, up to 2% of the
  • 05:05population will develop a kidney cancer.
  • 05:07It predominantly happens as people age,
  • 05:08so in the 6th, 7th and 8th decades of life.
  • 05:11But we do see it in younger patients
  • 05:13and you'll hear about that this evening
  • 05:15that there are hereditary syndromes that
  • 05:17can impact the risk of kidney cancer.
  • 05:19Risk factors is a very common question.
  • 05:22I think the most important thing to know is
  • 05:24that if someone developed a kidney cancer,
  • 05:26it is very rarely do to something that
  • 05:28they did. It's more common by chance,
  • 05:31but there is an association with
  • 05:32things like high blood pressure,
  • 05:33smoking, being overweight,
  • 05:35chronic kidney disease or dialysis can
  • 05:38increase the risk of developing a kidney
  • 05:40cancer as well as some exposures to
  • 05:43chemicals like chlorinated solvents.
  • 05:45We'll again.
  • 05:45You'll also will hear about the idea of
  • 05:47hereditary risk, and is there a gene?
  • 05:50Or set of genes that may have impacted
  • 05:52the risk of developing a kidney cancer.
  • 05:54Again, kidney cancer renal cell carcinoma
  • 05:56really is a family of kidney tumors.
  • 06:00The most common is something
  • 06:01called clear cell kidney cancer.
  • 06:03About that represents about 3/4 of cases
  • 06:06of kidney cancer papillary kidney cancer,
  • 06:07of which there are two types,
  • 06:09represents about 15 to 20% of kidney
  • 06:12tumor of kidney cancers and chromophobe.
  • 06:15Kidney cancer represents about 7%.
  • 06:17The remainder are much less common
  • 06:19things like.
  • 06:20Medullary collecting duct and translocation.
  • 06:22Kidney cancers.
  • 06:23The reason this is important is although
  • 06:26these are all renal cell carcinoma,
  • 06:28they really have a very wide spectrum of
  • 06:31behaviors so this is really important for
  • 06:33deciding about what type of treatment,
  • 06:35how aggressive a treatment might
  • 06:36be needed or the risk of a cancer
  • 06:38spreading elsewhere.
  • 06:39It also can impact the types of
  • 06:42treatments we offer and how people,
  • 06:44how people tumors respond to that treatment.
  • 06:49We often are asked questions about how
  • 06:52is what's the stage of my tumor and what
  • 06:55tumor stage is really is is rather simple.
  • 06:57It's where are the cancer cells and
  • 07:01as as a surgeon, I often see patients
  • 07:04with stage one or two kidney cancers,
  • 07:07and those are tumors that are confined
  • 07:09to the kidney and their stage one if
  • 07:11it's 7 centimeters or less, stage two,
  • 07:13if they're greater than 7 centimeters,
  • 07:15a stage three kidney cancer is shown here.
  • 07:18On the left I I think you can see my
  • 07:21cursor and it's a tumor that might
  • 07:23involve the fat around the kidney,
  • 07:24not just push against the fat,
  • 07:27but actually microscopically grow
  • 07:28into the fat around the kidney.
  • 07:30Or it might involve the urine
  • 07:32collecting system, or even the blood
  • 07:34vessels that drain the kidney,
  • 07:35called a tumor thrombus.
  • 07:38Or it may be a tumor that's
  • 07:40otherwise confined to the kidney,
  • 07:41but which has spread to lymph nodes.
  • 07:43These little green areas here,
  • 07:44which some of which have
  • 07:46yellow cancer within them.
  • 07:48A stage four kidney cancer,
  • 07:49on the other hand, maybe in the kidney,
  • 07:53but growing directly into an organ nearby,
  • 07:55not spreading to it through
  • 07:57the bloodstream necessarily.
  • 07:58But growing into it,
  • 07:59such as into the adrenal gland or a
  • 08:02tumor that's confined to the kidney,
  • 08:03but which has spread through the
  • 08:06bloodstream to other places either.
  • 08:08Places like the lung,
  • 08:10liver,
  • 08:10bones or also through the lymph
  • 08:12nodes outside of the area near
  • 08:14the kidney such as the lymph
  • 08:16nodes above the diaphragm.
  • 08:20It's important to know that
  • 08:22at the time of diagnosis,
  • 08:24the vast majority of patients have a
  • 08:26tumor that's confined to the kidney.
  • 08:28About 70% of patients, about 14%,
  • 08:31about 14% of patients in the United
  • 08:34States have tumors that are regional,
  • 08:36so they either are growing outside of
  • 08:38the kidney or into adjacent lymph nodes.
  • 08:41The classic way that patients
  • 08:43used to come in to see us.
  • 08:45But this only happens at about 5% or
  • 08:47less of the time now is with symptoms,
  • 08:49so a mask that they could feel on their side,
  • 08:52blood in the urine, or pain.
  • 08:56This cancer type used to be
  • 08:58called the internist tumor,
  • 08:59because when it is larger
  • 09:00or as spread elsewhere,
  • 09:02it's very common for patients
  • 09:03to have other symptoms and they
  • 09:05might be difficult to diagnose.
  • 09:06Weight loss, loss of energy, fevers even.
  • 09:11And then blood changes in the values
  • 09:15on their blood tests like anemia
  • 09:17or even high red blood cell count.
  • 09:19High calcium changes in their liver
  • 09:22function tests in the modern era,
  • 09:24though most patients don't have any
  • 09:26symptoms and these are discovered
  • 09:28incidentally.
  • 09:29This instant idea of incidental diagnosis,
  • 09:31I think, is a really important one.
  • 09:33It brings up this idea of what's
  • 09:35called over diagnosis.
  • 09:36This is a chart that shows that
  • 09:38over the past few decades,
  • 09:40more and more people in the United
  • 09:43States are being exposed to CT scans,
  • 09:46and so we have more and more opportunity
  • 09:49to find incidental tumors that might
  • 09:51otherwise not cause patients or problem.
  • 09:54And so the concept of overdiagnosis
  • 09:58is when the diagnosis of a tumor
  • 10:01is increasing and throughout the
  • 10:0390s and early 2000s.
  • 10:04It seemed like there was an epidemic
  • 10:06of new kidney cancer being diagnosed,
  • 10:08but at the same time the number
  • 10:10of patients who were dying from
  • 10:12kidney cancer did not change.
  • 10:13And So what this means is that we
  • 10:15were diagnosing tumors that were
  • 10:17not going to be harming patients,
  • 10:18and so this is overdiagnosis.
  • 10:21This is a really interesting study that
  • 10:23the map of the United States here shows.
  • 10:26Variation from different regions
  • 10:27in the use of CAT scans and so
  • 10:31over a five year period of time,
  • 10:33more than 40% of patients across
  • 10:35the United States who have Medicare
  • 10:37had a CAT scan of their chest or
  • 10:39cat scan of their abdomen and this
  • 10:41varied by regions as low as 30%
  • 10:43in one area of California,
  • 10:45higher than 50% in Sun City, AZ.
  • 10:47And really interestingly,
  • 10:49the more frequently cat scans
  • 10:51were happening in an area,
  • 10:53the more frequently patients
  • 10:54were having an affair.
  • 10:55Ectomy meaning their kidneys.
  • 10:57Removed and so if you if a patient
  • 10:59lives in a high scanning region,
  • 11:01they're actually at higher
  • 11:02risk of losing a kidney and the
  • 11:05risks associated with that.
  • 11:07So this brings up something really important.
  • 11:08How do we decide and how to treat
  • 11:11a patient who has a kidney tumor
  • 11:13and what I would argue is that
  • 11:15for small kidney mass is one of
  • 11:17the first things we should think
  • 11:18about. Is something called active
  • 11:20surveillance, and this is the
  • 11:22idea where we need to uncouple the
  • 11:24idea of diagnosing that tumor,
  • 11:25the one that's incidental on a cat scan
  • 11:27from the treatment of that kidney tumor,
  • 11:30we know that 20 to 30% of those
  • 11:32small masses are benign, like those
  • 11:33tumors I mentioned at the beginning.
  • 11:35And if they're cancer, they're commonly.
  • 11:37It's called indolent, not aggressive.
  • 11:41This is an ideal approach for masses
  • 11:43that are less than 3 centimeters in size
  • 11:45or even up to 4 centimeters that are
  • 11:48low stage and what we do is we image
  • 11:50every six months and we look to see if
  • 11:52it's growing faster than we'd like,
  • 11:54so more than 5 millimeters a year,
  • 11:56or if it's going to be above 3 centimeters
  • 11:58and in some patients 4 centimeters.
  • 12:01And at that point that's when we would
  • 12:03intervene and do a procedure to treat
  • 12:06the tumor. So what are the outcomes?
  • 12:08Well, with this,
  • 12:09with ten years of follow-up in
  • 12:11a large series of patients,
  • 12:13there was no difference in what's
  • 12:15called cancer specific survival,
  • 12:16meaning being alive.
  • 12:19And not having died of kidney
  • 12:22cancer and so 99% in either group.
  • 12:25Whether you had treatment upfront or
  • 12:28whether you went on surveillance,
  • 12:29there was 99 greater than 99% cancer
  • 12:32specific survival at 10 years.
  • 12:34And importantly,
  • 12:352/3 of patients didn't meet a trigger
  • 12:37for coming off of surveillance,
  • 12:39so it didn't really either either
  • 12:42didn't grow or grow slowly,
  • 12:44and also really,
  • 12:45importantly,
  • 12:45half of the patients in that this
  • 12:47group who came off surveillance came
  • 12:49off surveillance 'cause they chose to.
  • 12:51And so had treatment for for
  • 12:53their preference,
  • 12:54really important to know that
  • 12:55active surveillance is an option.
  • 12:57It's a safe option and the risk of
  • 13:01spread in published active surveillance
  • 13:03series ranges from from up to 2%.
  • 13:06But it's really important to know
  • 13:08that's only been in mass is greater
  • 13:10than 3 centimeters that are growing,
  • 13:11so it's a very,
  • 13:12very safe option for mass is
  • 13:14less than 3 centimeters,
  • 13:15particularly if they're growing
  • 13:16at a slow rate or not at all.
  • 13:20Maslow said something in the 1960s.
  • 13:23I suppose it's tempting if the
  • 13:24only tool you have is a hammer to
  • 13:27treat everything as if it's a nail,
  • 13:28and so as a surgeon it can be really
  • 13:30tempting to treat every patient
  • 13:32with a small renal mass with surgery
  • 13:34and it's just not the right thing.
  • 13:35Sometimes doing nothing can
  • 13:37be very difficult for.
  • 13:38For patients can also be very difficult
  • 13:41to not intervene on something.
  • 13:43But this is a very innovative,
  • 13:45very innovative approach.
  • 13:46That's an important one for all
  • 13:48of us to recognize that sometimes
  • 13:50doing nothing is the right approach.
  • 13:53Kidney mass biopsy.
  • 13:54This is a question that comes up a lot.
  • 13:56It used to not really be done
  • 13:59unless we suspected lymphoma cancer.
  • 14:01Having spread to the kidney or infection,
  • 14:03but because kidney mass biopsy in
  • 14:05the modern era is so much better
  • 14:07with a low rate of complications,
  • 14:09very little risk or no risk really
  • 14:12of tumor seeding. And high accuracy.
  • 14:14Kidney mass biopsy can be really
  • 14:17helpful so it has what's called
  • 14:19a positive predictive value of
  • 14:21greater than 99%,
  • 14:22meaning that if it diagnosis a kidney cancer,
  • 14:25we can trust that diagnosis.
  • 14:27The non diagnostic rate is
  • 14:29about 10% up to 14%,
  • 14:31but if we do a repeat biopsy
  • 14:35that that increases the the rate
  • 14:38of diagnosis substantially.
  • 14:40Really importantly,
  • 14:41is there are limitations of biopsy.
  • 14:43The kidney tumors can be heterogeneous,
  • 14:45so not all areas of kidney tumors
  • 14:47are the same,
  • 14:48and biopsy isn't perfect for grade.
  • 14:50If it's an aggressive cancer or not.
  • 14:53So there we shouldn't always do
  • 14:55a kidney mass biopsy,
  • 14:57but there are really important
  • 14:58times where it's a great tool.
  • 15:00This is what it looks like
  • 15:01where a patient has a CAT scan.
  • 15:03This white line is a needle that's
  • 15:05entering the kidney,
  • 15:06the kidney mass.
  • 15:07This shows a needle entering
  • 15:10the mass and then and taking
  • 15:12out a small sample of tissue.
  • 15:16So the idea of when to obtain a biopsy.
  • 15:19It's sometimes it really is.
  • 15:21Sometimes, as one of my colleagues said,
  • 15:23more than never, but less than always,
  • 15:25and so we do it.
  • 15:26If we suspect lymphoma, Abscess,
  • 15:30or spread to the kid spread of
  • 15:32another cancer to the kidney.
  • 15:34If the patient is.
  • 15:38If the patients candidate
  • 15:39for active surveillance,
  • 15:41depending on a biopsy result,
  • 15:42we might do a biopsy.
  • 15:44If we're planning on doing an
  • 15:46ablation and not removing the tumor,
  • 15:47that's the time to do a biopsy,
  • 15:49so we can define what it is,
  • 15:51and if the patient end the the treatment
  • 15:53team are willing to observe a tumor.
  • 15:56Depending on the biopsy result,
  • 15:58a biopsy can be really,
  • 15:59really helpful.
  • 16:01It's not just biopsy,
  • 16:02though that can help us decide whether
  • 16:04a mass is safe for surveillance.
  • 16:05There is an imaging study
  • 16:08called a SESTAMIBI scan,
  • 16:09and this is used typically for something
  • 16:11else other than kidney tumors.
  • 16:13But over the past five years or so
  • 16:15it's it's got an increasing use.
  • 16:18You can see at the top.
  • 16:19This is what's called an
  • 16:20uncle Cytoma benign tumor,
  • 16:22and on a sestamibi that
  • 16:24oncocytoma lights up bright.
  • 16:27This is a kidney tumor
  • 16:28down here at the bottom,
  • 16:29a kidney cancer down at the bottom.
  • 16:31You can see it's what we call cold.
  • 16:32It does not take up the sestamibi.
  • 16:35Basically the kidney cancers have a
  • 16:37little pump in them that pumps the
  • 16:39sestamibi out and the oncocytoma's
  • 16:41have have are packed with something
  • 16:43called mitochondria that take
  • 16:44up the sestamibi and they don't
  • 16:46have the pumps to get rid of it,
  • 16:48so that's why it's so hot.
  • 16:50It's a very active area of investigation.
  • 16:52We are using this here to help our
  • 16:54patients decide on treatment for
  • 16:56small kidney masses. It is a good.
  • 16:58It seems to be a good adjunct to biopsy,
  • 17:00but it is still an area of investigation.
  • 17:03So how do we treat localized kidney cancer?
  • 17:05I ask my patients to think about
  • 17:083 areas to consider.
  • 17:09Three things cancer control
  • 17:11if that's important.
  • 17:12If that's necessary,
  • 17:14sparing kidney function and then
  • 17:16risks recovery and quality of life.
  • 17:18So what is the evolution
  • 17:19of kidney cancer surgery?
  • 17:21What does it look like from the 50s,
  • 17:22sixties, 70s and 80s?
  • 17:24We really did radical nephric to me,
  • 17:26and so this is removal of the whole kidney,
  • 17:28including lymph nodes
  • 17:29including the adrenal gland,
  • 17:31all the fat around the kidney,
  • 17:33radical meaning.
  • 17:33From the word meaning roots
  • 17:35right to take the cancer up by
  • 17:38its roots and we only did what's
  • 17:40called partial nephrectomy.
  • 17:40Me just removing the mass in
  • 17:42a thin rim of normal tissue.
  • 17:43Only in very select cases,
  • 17:46such as if the patient only had one
  • 17:48kidney starting in the 90s and the
  • 17:502000s we realized that we were able
  • 17:52to not take out the adrenal gland
  • 17:54because imaging had improved so much.
  • 17:56If the adrenal looks normal,
  • 17:58we don't take it out.
  • 17:58Same thing for lymph nodes.
  • 18:00We don't take them out unless
  • 18:01they're abnormal and then we started
  • 18:03to do what's called elective.
  • 18:04Partial nephrectomy so doing a
  • 18:06partial nephrectomy in patients
  • 18:07who have two kidneys.
  • 18:10From 2010, kind of beyond,
  • 18:13we've done increasingly complex,
  • 18:14minimally invasive surgery,
  • 18:16including use of the surgical robot.
  • 18:18A big advance has been in something called
  • 18:21Irraz enhanced recovery after surgery,
  • 18:23where we're getting patients home and
  • 18:25back to their usual lives faster.
  • 18:28A lot of focus on preventing the
  • 18:30complications of surgery such as blood
  • 18:32clot and surgical site infections.
  • 18:33I think most importantly,
  • 18:35integrating surgery with
  • 18:36medications to treat the cancer.
  • 18:38Why is this important?
  • 18:40Well, surgical advances really
  • 18:42have focused on risks recovery,
  • 18:44quality of life,
  • 18:45sparing kidney function,
  • 18:46and by doing that we've really done
  • 18:48less so doing surveillance doing
  • 18:49partial nephric to me, doing ablation.
  • 18:52Doing minimally invasive surgery but
  • 18:55surgical advances have not really done
  • 18:58much from a cancer control perspective.
  • 19:00What's done that really
  • 19:02is doing more meaning,
  • 19:03not just surgery but integrating
  • 19:06surgery with other treatment
  • 19:08modalities such as medication.
  • 19:10I'd like to quickly go through some of
  • 19:12the treatment options one is ablation.
  • 19:14This is freezing or frying the mass.
  • 19:16Most commonly here we do what's called
  • 19:18percutaneous or through the skin,
  • 19:19cryo ablation.
  • 19:20It's done by the interventional radiologist.
  • 19:23It's a great option for mass,
  • 19:24is less than 3 centimeters in
  • 19:26size to very low risk procedure.
  • 19:28Very well tolerated people go
  • 19:29home the same day no incision.
  • 19:33It has its pairs kidney function
  • 19:35similar to partial nephrectomy.
  • 19:37Me, that's great.
  • 19:38It does have a slightly higher risk of
  • 19:41cancer recurrence than surgery does,
  • 19:43but the good news is a second ablation takes
  • 19:46care of of the vast majority of those,
  • 19:48so it's a very very good option if patients
  • 19:51are not great surgical candidates,
  • 19:53or in a very small,
  • 19:54very accessible tumor in a patient who
  • 19:56doesn't feel comfortable with surveillance.
  • 19:58The key thing is location.
  • 20:00This is an ideally situated tumor
  • 20:01for ablation far away from the
  • 20:03blood vessels in the kidney.
  • 20:05But if there there can be tumors
  • 20:06that are close to the blood vessels
  • 20:08close to the urine collecting system
  • 20:09where ablation is not a good option.
  • 20:13This is just what ablation looks like.
  • 20:15This is a tumor at the
  • 20:16top of the left kidney.
  • 20:18A biopsy was done, then an ultrasound,
  • 20:20then a cryotherapy probe was put in here.
  • 20:24The patient did have a
  • 20:25little bit of bleeding.
  • 20:26You can see after the procedure which is OK.
  • 20:29They then had a small recurrence.
  • 20:31They cut off the blood flow
  • 20:33to that portion of the kidney.
  • 20:34Then it was frozen.
  • 20:35This is from a research paper,
  • 20:36not from our center.
  • 20:38It was frozen again and then four
  • 20:40years later no sign of of any cancer.
  • 20:42It's a lot to go through,
  • 20:43but the patient did not need surgery.
  • 20:47Partial diff ectomy like ablation,
  • 20:50spares kidney,
  • 20:50but it's surgery and in that
  • 20:53surgery we remove the tumor suture.
  • 20:55The rest of the kidney back together.
  • 20:57This can be done open laparoscopic
  • 20:59Lee or much more commonly
  • 21:01now it's done robotically.
  • 21:02We prioritize partial nephric to me even
  • 21:05when the tumors are highly highly complex.
  • 21:08If a patient has only one kidney,
  • 21:10if there's tumors in both kidneys or
  • 21:12if they have chronic kidney disease.
  • 21:15We know from retrospective research
  • 21:17looking back at the patients we've
  • 21:19treated that partial effectively
  • 21:20reduces the risk of chronic kidney
  • 21:22disease compared to removing the whole
  • 21:24thing compared to radical nephrectomy,
  • 21:26and it provides the exact
  • 21:28same cancer control.
  • 21:29This is a really,
  • 21:31really important option for our
  • 21:33patients and is very commonly employed,
  • 21:35so partial direct to me these days is
  • 21:38still done at many centers open they
  • 21:41with an open incision, and that's OK.
  • 21:44The key?
  • 21:45The advantage of minimally
  • 21:46invasive surgery though,
  • 21:47is a really significant
  • 21:49improvement in patients recovery,
  • 21:51even for highly complicated
  • 21:53tumors like you see down here,
  • 21:54we do the vast majority of our partial
  • 21:56infectees with robotic surgery. Here I am.
  • 21:59I am a really big fan of the surgical robot.
  • 22:05It's made by a company called
  • 22:06Intuitive Surgical.
  • 22:07It's pictured here.
  • 22:08This is the console where the surgeon sits.
  • 22:10It has a dual eyepiece
  • 22:12that provides a 3D view.
  • 22:14This is the robot itself that has.
  • 22:16Four different minimally invasive
  • 22:19instruments that that we use.
  • 22:22To do the operation itself,
  • 22:23and this is what's called the vision cart,
  • 22:25where my assistant who's at the
  • 22:26bedside is able to also see what's
  • 22:29happening inside the abdomen.
  • 22:30This is the eyepiece I look through.
  • 22:32There's a.
  • 22:33These are the handpieces that control
  • 22:35whole variety of instruments,
  • 22:36including a 3D camera and a variety
  • 22:39of other instruments for suturing,
  • 22:41and for cauterizing and
  • 22:44otherwise treating tissue.
  • 22:46Radical nephrectomy,
  • 22:47unlike partial nephric to me,
  • 22:49is we remove the entire kidney.
  • 22:50We remove the fat around it, we remove.
  • 22:52In some cases, the adrenal gland,
  • 22:54and, in some cases,
  • 22:55cases lymph nodes and the factors that
  • 22:58make us remove the entire kidney is if
  • 23:01a partial fraction be just not feasible,
  • 23:04it's the radical nephrectomy
  • 23:05is the standard approach for
  • 23:07what's called a T1B tumor,
  • 23:08or higher.
  • 23:09If the tumor is just highly
  • 23:11complicated, if it's locally advanced,
  • 23:13if it's involving the vein or lymph nodes,
  • 23:15a standard approach is to remove the whole.
  • 23:17The whole kidney in general.
  • 23:19There are fewer complications
  • 23:20with radical and effectively
  • 23:21than with partial nephrectomy.
  • 23:22Me, but obviously with losing the
  • 23:25whole kidney there is increased risk
  • 23:27of developing chronic kidney disease.
  • 23:30There is a time where we almost
  • 23:31always do surgery these days.
  • 23:33Still with open surgery, and that's if
  • 23:35the kidney tumor invades a blood vessel,
  • 23:38and so kidney tumors can invade a big vein
  • 23:40in the belly called inferior vena cava,
  • 23:43and that can even extend all
  • 23:44the way up into the heart and.
  • 23:46In those cases,
  • 23:48we have a team here of liver surgeons,
  • 23:51heart surgeons,
  • 23:52and neurologists who treat those
  • 23:54patients primarily with open
  • 23:56surgery to remove the kidney and to
  • 23:58remove the entire tumor thrombus.
  • 24:03Kidney surgery for many patients,
  • 24:05though, may not be enough in some.
  • 24:08Obviously it's not necessary,
  • 24:09in others it may not be enough,
  • 24:10and so we've investigated
  • 24:11what we call adjuvant therapy,
  • 24:13and this is medications after surgery.
  • 24:17To reduce the risk of the cancer coming back,
  • 24:20there have been dozens of trials done in
  • 24:22kidney cancer dating back more than 50 years.
  • 24:24All of them were negative until recently
  • 24:26there was a medication that has an FDA
  • 24:28approval for in the agement setting.
  • 24:30It's used by some medical oncologists.
  • 24:32It's generally not used here, though,
  • 24:34and this is a medication called sunitinib.
  • 24:36It tends to cause a fair amount of
  • 24:38complications and what you can see here is
  • 24:40this is what's called the overall survival.
  • 24:43Survival curves.
  • 24:44There's actually 2 lines there overlapping,
  • 24:46and that drug does not seem.
  • 24:48To help patients live longer,
  • 24:50we generally don't use it.
  • 24:51There's a very promising study.
  • 24:55Called keynote 564 studying a what's called
  • 24:58an immune checkpoint drug or pembrook.
  • 25:01It's a pembrolizumab or Pembroke
  • 25:03and this showed a significant
  • 25:04improvement in what's called disease.
  • 25:06Free survival and some promising.
  • 25:11Promising appearing curve for
  • 25:13what's called overall survival
  • 25:14or helping patients live longer.
  • 25:16It is FDA authorized and we're
  • 25:18still at this point,
  • 25:19I think,
  • 25:20very much as a whole field trying
  • 25:21to sort out which patients are the
  • 25:23appropriate patients for this drug.
  • 25:25And we're all anxiously awaiting
  • 25:27the overall survival data.
  • 25:29I think the summary here is that
  • 25:31not all kidney cancer is the same.
  • 25:32It's important to know that typed the size,
  • 25:34the stage, the location.
  • 25:36It's important to decide on
  • 25:37treatment if it's necessary,
  • 25:39and if it if treatment is necessary.
  • 25:41Which is the best one we should
  • 25:42do less when we safely can and
  • 25:44use a team approach to the most
  • 25:46challenging cases and very clearly
  • 25:48integrating surgery and medication
  • 25:50therapy is really a key frontier
  • 25:52for us over the next decade.
  • 25:54Thank you very much for your time.
  • 25:56Thank you so much,
  • 25:57doctor Kenny, that was great.
  • 25:59I earned. I learned a lot.
  • 26:02There are some questions in the chat
  • 26:03that have been answered and some
  • 26:05that happen, so if OK with you,
  • 26:07I'd just like to ask you those
  • 26:08that have not been answered yet.
  • 26:12So there's a question about how
  • 26:14often do you see a diagnosis
  • 26:17of metastatic kidney cancer
  • 26:18without a clear primary tumor?
  • 26:22That's a, that's a great question.
  • 26:24We we really don't at that happens
  • 26:26a lot in other tumor types,
  • 26:27but most often in kidney cancer there's a.
  • 26:31There's an obvious primary tumor.
  • 26:32I myself have not taken care of
  • 26:34a patient who's had metastatic
  • 26:36kidney cancer without a primary.
  • 26:38I'm not sure Harriet or
  • 26:39Michael or David if you have.
  • 26:42Yeah, I've seen it once.
  • 26:44Yeah, we have it.
  • 26:45It happens a little, you know.
  • 26:46Uncommonly, I I think the question let me.
  • 26:48Maybe I'll answer this a little bit.
  • 26:50You know there's sort of a few different
  • 26:52possibilities every once in a long,
  • 26:53long, long while,
  • 26:54even though there's a tumor there,
  • 26:56you can't exactly see it because
  • 26:57it's about the same density on
  • 26:59the scans as the other tissue.
  • 27:01So there's really something there,
  • 27:02but no one really detected it.
  • 27:03And then the other thing that we know
  • 27:05that happens sometimes in kidney
  • 27:07cancer is that there's a tumor there
  • 27:09that get then sort of went away,
  • 27:10even though other tumors have remained.
  • 27:13And I think all of us who treat
  • 27:15metastatic cancer have seen that.
  • 27:17That happens and not that many cancers,
  • 27:19but it does sometimes happen
  • 27:20in kidney and Melanoma.
  • 27:21Actually, which Doctor Cooper treats that?
  • 27:23You'll see a tumor start and then go away.
  • 27:25So maybe the tumor was there,
  • 27:27then something spread and then it went away.
  • 27:31There's something called the abscopal
  • 27:32effect or the Lazarus effect,
  • 27:34where it happens we see it in kidney cancer,
  • 27:38especially if there's been a few reports
  • 27:40of patients who have had a metastasis
  • 27:42treated either with ablation or radiation,
  • 27:44and then the primary tumor or metastasis
  • 27:47and other sites have melted away.
  • 27:49It happens in kidney cancer, but quite rare.
  • 27:53So there was
  • 27:54a question about whether papillary
  • 27:55renal cell carcinoma is the same
  • 27:57as papillary thyroid and actually
  • 27:59Doctor Brown who's got the orange
  • 28:00tie for kidney cancer, answered it,
  • 28:02but I don't know that everybody
  • 28:03saw that and the answer is no,
  • 28:05it's not. It just looks the
  • 28:07same under them. It has similar
  • 28:08features in the under the microscope
  • 28:10that the cell of origin of origin
  • 28:12is quite different.
  • 28:15Then Patrick there was a question about
  • 28:17how often you have clear cell renal
  • 28:20cell carcinoma that has both sarcomatoid
  • 28:23and rhabdoid features.
  • 28:26So Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid
  • 28:28features themselves are
  • 28:29relatively rare in combination.
  • 28:32We do see it, but also relatively rare.
  • 28:35They are higher grade features of a
  • 28:39kidney tumor that tends to mean the
  • 28:42tumor itself is more aggressive and
  • 28:45also may impact our treatment selection.
  • 28:48For instance, if a patient
  • 28:50has metastatic kidney cancer,
  • 28:52sometimes surgery itself can can be
  • 28:55appropriate as a first treatment.
  • 28:57Option and if we know that a
  • 28:59patient has a sarcomatoid kidney
  • 29:01cancer or a rhabdoid kidney cancer
  • 29:03that has spread elsewhere.
  • 29:05Oftentimes,
  • 29:06surgery may not be the right
  • 29:07first approach for those patients,
  • 29:09and where medication may be
  • 29:12the first right approach.
  • 29:13And in the case where the medication has
  • 29:16done a good job of stabilizing the tumor
  • 29:18or the tumor has responded to the medication,
  • 29:21surgery,
  • 29:21then might be an option.
  • 29:23But but Sarcomatoid and Rhabdoid
  • 29:26together relatively.
  • 29:27Rare I I don't have a good sense
  • 29:30of whether that would change
  • 29:33a patient's prognosis.
  • 29:34They're all still grade 4.
  • 29:38Then there's a question about
  • 29:40you. You made a comment about kidney
  • 29:42disease, and I think sometimes
  • 29:43as physicians we use terminology.
  • 29:45That's not not all that clear.
  • 29:48So there was a request for
  • 29:50clarification about kidney disease
  • 29:51versus kidney cancer.
  • 29:54Great question.
  • 29:55Thank you for pointing that out.
  • 29:56I I have to I have to say I I
  • 29:58I do tend to slip into medical
  • 30:00words and I I'm sorry I so kidney
  • 30:02disease has to do with the ability
  • 30:04of the kidneys to fill the to
  • 30:06perform their job of filtration.
  • 30:08So we have various different
  • 30:10ways of measuring that.
  • 30:11One of them is a blood test
  • 30:13called serum creatinine,
  • 30:14and when the creatinine is elevated
  • 30:16that indicates a reduction in
  • 30:17kidney function and we call that
  • 30:19chronic kidney disease, or CKD,
  • 30:21and that's when it's persistent over the
  • 30:25course of weeks or months or longer.
  • 30:28Like one of the key things
  • 30:30about partial nephrectomy,
  • 30:31me active surveillance ablation
  • 30:33compared to radical nephrectomy is that
  • 30:36for patients who have kidney disease
  • 30:37or who are trying to prevent it,
  • 30:40those what we call nephron sparing
  • 30:42or kidney sparing approaches may
  • 30:44be a better option because they're
  • 30:46associated with a lower risk of
  • 30:48developing kidney dysfunction.
  • 30:50Thank you for that,
  • 30:51that was a great answer.
  • 30:53Then there's a question
  • 30:55about stage three cancer.
  • 30:57There's a comment.
  • 30:58From somebody who had a 4.6
  • 31:00centimeter tumor,
  • 31:01but it was called stage three.
  • 31:03Can you clarify that
  • 31:05how that's possible?
  • 31:08So so a 4.6 centimeter tumor that can be
  • 31:14stage three really kind of for two reasons.
  • 31:17One would be if it there was a the
  • 31:20tumor had associated in lymph nodes.
  • 31:22So meaning if there was
  • 31:24involvement of the lymph nodes,
  • 31:26then no matter what the the,
  • 31:28the tumor size or or T stage is,
  • 31:31it would be a stage 3 tumor.
  • 31:33Or if that tumor was involving
  • 31:35the fat around the kidney or
  • 31:37in the center of the kidney.
  • 31:39The urine collecting system or a blood
  • 31:42vessel within the kidney and that would
  • 31:44be stage 3 even for very small tumors,
  • 31:47and so I've taken care of
  • 31:49patients who've had very, very,
  • 31:50very small tumors that were stage
  • 31:53three just based on involvement
  • 31:55of those other features.
  • 31:58Then are there instances where somebody
  • 32:00has metastatic kidney cancer and
  • 32:02there's no surgery done?
  • 32:05Very, very commonly.
  • 32:06So you the paradigm starting about
  • 32:0920 years ago, was to do something
  • 32:12called cytoreductive nephrectomy.
  • 32:13So they're mean to remove the kidney when
  • 32:16in the setting of kidney cancer spread,
  • 32:18and for a variety of reasons
  • 32:20we do that less commonly now.
  • 32:22It's very, very nuanced,
  • 32:24but there was an important study
  • 32:27a few years ago called Carmina,
  • 32:28and it was a study looking at
  • 32:30use of a medication alone or
  • 32:33a medication plus surgery,
  • 32:34and it showed that that medication alone.
  • 32:36Performed just as well as surgery,
  • 32:38plus the medication so very commonly
  • 32:40these days we take care of patients with
  • 32:44kidney cancer that spread elsewhere
  • 32:45and they don't have to have surgery.
  • 32:48Thank you, director
  • 32:50Kitty. Thank you so much for
  • 32:52a wonderful presentation.
  • 32:53And now I've got the distinct pleasure
  • 32:56of introducing our second speaker.
  • 32:58It's doctor Michael Hurwitz,
  • 33:00who is one of my fellow oncologists Mike.
  • 33:04Yeah, so I share screen here.
  • 33:05See if I can get the store.
  • 33:10Is it visible? Yes, we've got
  • 33:13your slide sorter hold on.
  • 33:15Let me go to the beginning again.
  • 33:20Oh wait a minute. Sorry folks.
  • 33:25Why isn't it going to?
  • 33:28Now can everybody spit?
  • 33:30Yep. OK alright great so.
  • 33:33Hi everyone, welcome again.
  • 33:35As Harriet said, I'm I'm I'm one of
  • 33:37the medical oncologists tonight.
  • 33:38I treat kidney cancers and also
  • 33:41bladder and prostate cancers.
  • 33:43And I'm going to talk about
  • 33:45treatment of metastatic cancer.
  • 33:46You know, I,
  • 33:47I know that the topic here is supposed
  • 33:49to be kidney cancer and all the
  • 33:51various treatments that we give,
  • 33:52but to some degree I wanted to
  • 33:55backtrack a little bit and the reason
  • 33:57for that is that not everybody knows
  • 34:00some of these basics about cancer.
  • 34:01And when I say not everybody,
  • 34:04I mean a lot of doctors who
  • 34:06are not kidney or cancer.
  • 34:07Doctors aren't exactly aware of a lot of
  • 34:10the basics of cancer in it, and the reason?
  • 34:13That I wanna.
  • 34:15Talk about it this way is that I
  • 34:17think to understand how we decide to
  • 34:20treat metastatic cancer in the kidney,
  • 34:22it makes sense to think about
  • 34:24sort of what cancer really is.
  • 34:26OK, so let's start with what is cancer?
  • 34:28Something really basic and so cancer is
  • 34:30made up of cells that don't behave normally.
  • 34:33And what I mean by that is that
  • 34:34cancer is really a disease of cells.
  • 34:37It's a disease of individual cells that
  • 34:38are doing what they should not be doing,
  • 34:40and they they're really three specific
  • 34:43things that they do that that.
  • 34:45Are the hallmarks of cancers so number
  • 34:49one they conceded to divide even
  • 34:51when they are not told to divide?
  • 34:53OK two,
  • 34:55they even continue to divide when
  • 34:57they are told not to divide,
  • 34:59so one is they can do divide
  • 35:01on their own and other is when
  • 35:02they're told to stop dividing.
  • 35:03They continue to divide.
  • 35:05And lastly they won't die
  • 35:06when they're supposed to.
  • 35:08Now some of this may not
  • 35:09make sense to everyone here,
  • 35:10but I think it's worth pointing
  • 35:12out that all cells in the human
  • 35:14body are are really in continuous
  • 35:16conversation with each other.
  • 35:17Cells talk to each other in various ways.
  • 35:19I'm going to go into that a little bit
  • 35:21and they're always sending signals to
  • 35:23each other to say things like don't divide,
  • 35:26do, divide,
  • 35:27make something like make insulin for example,
  • 35:31and they're also told the die.
  • 35:33Sometimes a lot of cells are
  • 35:34dying on purpose all the time.
  • 35:36That is the way the society
  • 35:38in your body works,
  • 35:39so.
  • 35:40Cancer is a disease where the cells
  • 35:43have lost the ability to communicate,
  • 35:45and they're dividing when they shouldn't.
  • 35:48And you know the vast majority of of
  • 35:51cells also that that form cancers in
  • 35:53adults form the lining of tissues.
  • 35:55Doctor Kenny actually referred to this
  • 35:57before, and a lot of the linings.
  • 35:59I don't know if everyone can see my cursor.
  • 36:00Is that just me or can people see it?
  • 36:03Pat, you're the only one who I can.
  • 36:04I don't know if you're, but yeah,
  • 36:05we can see well oh,
  • 36:06good, good, OK, alright so so normally we
  • 36:08have these things called called it doesn't
  • 36:10matter the linings of tissues and obvious
  • 36:12and often these cells are neatly on them.
  • 36:15And I show a cell wasn't called a nucleus,
  • 36:16middle of the cell. And then there's this
  • 36:18process that happens when can't when,
  • 36:20when when normal cells turn into cancers?
  • 36:22And I also do this grayish junk here
  • 36:24and that's that's called the there's a
  • 36:27there's something called a submucosa,
  • 36:29or there's something called ground substance,
  • 36:31and that's what these cells are sitting on.
  • 36:33OK, and that's a normal
  • 36:35thing in in most tissues.
  • 36:37So the first thing that can happen is the
  • 36:38cells can divide inappropriately and then
  • 36:40you get a lot of cells, but they're not.
  • 36:42They don't look wrong,
  • 36:43they're not doing anything all that abnormal.
  • 36:45Then you have a precancerous stage,
  • 36:47so sometimes we call these
  • 36:48things adenoma or breast cancer.
  • 36:50We often call it DCIS or LCIS,
  • 36:53and then this is when the
  • 36:55cells start looking funny,
  • 36:56but they haven't done anything
  • 36:59definitively cancerous yet.
  • 37:01We call it cancer when they have
  • 37:04actually invaded into a tissue.
  • 37:05OK, and invasion means breaking
  • 37:08out of this underlying membrane.
  • 37:10That is the way we define cancer,
  • 37:12and again,
  • 37:12the cause of it is what I said before.
  • 37:18There we go. OK, so.
  • 37:20I said cancer is a disease where
  • 37:23cells misbehave and the question
  • 37:25is why aren't they behaving and
  • 37:28the basic answer is that there
  • 37:30is something called DNA mutation.
  • 37:32So DNA is the is the blueprint for
  • 37:36everything that is done by a solid body.
  • 37:38So everything that is done in your
  • 37:40body is done based on a code and that
  • 37:43blueprint that encodes it is made up of
  • 37:46DNA which the string of actually code.
  • 37:49I've drawn it here. Everyones got 2.
  • 37:51Of the same piece of code in their body.
  • 37:55So we have we have we have paired
  • 37:56what are called chromosomes.
  • 37:57I only drew 2 here.
  • 37:58We actually have 23 pairs but but either way,
  • 38:03when a cell starts,
  • 38:04it's maybe there's a mutation in it.
  • 38:06OK, and I've drawn it as an X.
  • 38:07Alright,
  • 38:08what distinguishes cancer from other?
  • 38:11Disease in the body is that
  • 38:14cancer cannot control.
  • 38:15Cancer cells are very bad at
  • 38:19fixing DNA mutations.
  • 38:21Normally.
  • 38:21If you have a DNA mutation,
  • 38:23either it will be fixed or the cell
  • 38:24will say you know I can't fix it.
  • 38:26The cell will kill itself.
  • 38:27That doesn't happen with cancer
  • 38:28and this leads to two things.
  • 38:30First of all,
  • 38:31what happens is more mutations
  • 38:33develop as the cells divide OK,
  • 38:35the second thing that happens is in every
  • 38:39cell division you're going to get different.
  • 38:41Cells right?
  • 38:42Because mutations are
  • 38:43developing all the time,
  • 38:45but the same mutation that happens
  • 38:47in this cell isn't necessarily
  • 38:48going to happen in this cell.
  • 38:50So every time there's division,
  • 38:51you can get more and more mutations.
  • 38:54Is this healthy?
  • 38:55No, many,
  • 38:56many of the cells and cancers will die.
  • 38:59Cancer cells are not particularly healthy,
  • 39:01but some of them will develop what
  • 39:03we call malignant clones and they
  • 39:05will go on to form these cancers
  • 39:07that are very hard to control
  • 39:08because the blueprint is wrong.
  • 39:11They're no longer doing what
  • 39:12they're supposed to be doing.
  • 39:14And the last thing I want to talk
  • 39:15about is sort of what is cancer?
  • 39:17Is something called metastasis.
  • 39:18I know we've all heard the term
  • 39:21metastasis means when there is
  • 39:22spread of a of a cancer from
  • 39:24one area to another area and
  • 39:26it means it's not continuous,
  • 39:28meaning it's not the whole
  • 39:30tumor mass growing.
  • 39:31It's actually a cell breaking off
  • 39:33and going somewhere else in the body.
  • 39:35OK, so first,
  • 39:36it's worth pointing out if everyone
  • 39:37doesn't know this and there's
  • 39:39no reason you would know this,
  • 39:40that many cells in the body are able to move.
  • 39:43They can migrate and that is
  • 39:45what happens in cancer,
  • 39:46so that's what's required for
  • 39:48metastasis once they move somewhere,
  • 39:49they have to find a place that
  • 39:51can support their growth.
  • 39:53OK, and there's this idea of a
  • 39:54seal seed and soil hypothesis,
  • 39:56for example,
  • 39:57kidney cancers often go to bones.
  • 39:58They often go to lung,
  • 40:00sometimes they go to liver,
  • 40:01other cancers don't go to those places,
  • 40:03and that's because in addition to
  • 40:05the fact there's the blood supply
  • 40:08that sends it to certain places,
  • 40:10they can only go and land in
  • 40:12certain places and grow there. OK.
  • 40:15And then lastly, once they do get there,
  • 40:17they have to be able to set up a food supply,
  • 40:19which really means the blood
  • 40:21supply and that we have a term
  • 40:23for that which is angiogenesis.
  • 40:24And that's gonna be really important
  • 40:25for how we treat kidney cancers.
  • 40:26OK, moving on,
  • 40:28I want to talk about how the cells
  • 40:30actually talk to each other because
  • 40:32I mentioned that cells talk to each
  • 40:34other all the time and the way they
  • 40:36talk to each other is they send things
  • 40:38out of 1 cell and it goes to something
  • 40:39on the other cell and the other cell
  • 40:41has what's called a receptor to bind it.
  • 40:43Sort of like a lock and key.
  • 40:44So here's an example.
  • 40:46I have the outside of the cell here,
  • 40:48and here's the cell membrane and
  • 40:50here's a receptor or a lock.
  • 40:52OK, and this thing is a key,
  • 40:54it's something called EGF.
  • 40:55It's sent from somewhere else,
  • 40:56and when it binds to this thing
  • 40:59this thing turns or it changes.
  • 41:01And actually there are things called
  • 41:03phosphorylated groups that end up on that.
  • 41:04Once those things are there.
  • 41:07Something inside the cell.
  • 41:09We'll find it.
  • 41:11They're moving around each other
  • 41:12all the time and it will bind to it,
  • 41:13because this thing recognizes it,
  • 41:16so it'll bind to it and it brings
  • 41:19in a friend.
  • 41:21And that friend brings in yet
  • 41:24another thing that binds to it.
  • 41:26And this thing called wrasses.
  • 41:28Very important cancer.
  • 41:29These things that I'm talking about.
  • 41:32They're not just little things
  • 41:33that bind to each other.
  • 41:34They're actually little molecular machines,
  • 41:37OK? This machine just sticks things together.
  • 41:42OK, it's an adapter,
  • 41:43but this is a machine that
  • 41:46turns this machine on OK,
  • 41:48and once this thing is on,
  • 41:50it's a general on switch oops that
  • 41:52turns on another protein which
  • 41:54turns on another protein which
  • 41:56turns on another protein and that
  • 41:59results in cells dividing.
  • 42:01That's actually a normal process.
  • 42:03We want that a lot of the time
  • 42:04you often need cells that divide.
  • 42:06OK, you need it every day.
  • 42:08But you don't always want it,
  • 42:10and cancer,
  • 42:10it's happening when it shouldn't
  • 42:12be happening all right.
  • 42:14So what's unique about kidney
  • 42:15cancer that those are sort of?
  • 42:16That's my general view of what cancer is,
  • 42:17alright,
  • 42:18so kidney cancer is actually
  • 42:19as Doctor Kenny pointed out,
  • 42:21a whole big group of cancers.
  • 42:23Now the vast majority of of it.
  • 42:26You know about 90% of it or more,
  • 42:28are the types that some of which
  • 42:30were mentioned by Doctor Kenny.
  • 42:31Clear cell carcinoma is the most common.
  • 42:33It's about 75% of it.
  • 42:34There's something called papillary
  • 42:36and chromophobe,
  • 42:36which was mentioned before.
  • 42:39In addition to the fact that we know there
  • 42:41are certain types of types of cancers,
  • 42:43there's also something called kidney cancer
  • 42:45syndromes where they run in families,
  • 42:47and the reason they have these cancers
  • 42:49is because one of their genes has a
  • 42:52DNA mutation that that results in a
  • 42:54predisposition for these things to occur,
  • 42:57and the one I want to talk about is
  • 42:58something called Von Hippel, Lindau Sovon.
  • 43:00Hippel. Lindau is a is a disease that
  • 43:03results in tumors in many different organs,
  • 43:07but probably the most famous one
  • 43:09is in the kidneys.
  • 43:11So what is von Hippel Lindau so von Hippel?
  • 43:13Lindau is a protein that is important
  • 43:15in something called oxygen sensing.
  • 43:17So the cells in your body are able
  • 43:19to actually sense when there's
  • 43:21oxygen there and when there isn't
  • 43:23much much oxygen there they think.
  • 43:25Why isn't there oxygen there?
  • 43:26Probably there's no blood supply and what
  • 43:29happens is they send out more signals,
  • 43:31developed blood vessels so.
  • 43:34When there's normal oxygen.
  • 43:37This protein, called DHL,
  • 43:38is on what VHL does is it turns the
  • 43:42oxygen sensing pathway off alright,
  • 43:44so oxygen present VHL is on.
  • 43:47Nothing happens if the pathways off
  • 43:50nothing that the machines are all off.
  • 43:53But when there's a low oxygen level,
  • 43:55VHL is turned off.
  • 43:56And then the oxygen sensing pathway
  • 43:59is on and that results oops.
  • 44:01In blood vessel growth in cell
  • 44:04division and in some cell movement.
  • 44:06In kidney cancer and people who
  • 44:09have mutations in this VHL gene.
  • 44:11The HL is always off 'cause it's broken.
  • 44:14So the oxygen sensing pathway
  • 44:16is on all the time,
  • 44:18and so that predisposes
  • 44:19these cancer to develop.
  • 44:24And why is that so important?
  • 44:26Because it turns out that we have
  • 44:30medications that actually block parts
  • 44:32of that oxygen sensing pathway,
  • 44:33and actually there's a new one that I
  • 44:35didn't put on here called bills udaff
  • 44:37and I don't know if Doctor Brown is
  • 44:38going to talk about that. He's nodding.
  • 44:40He is going to talk about that.
  • 44:42So it's we got about Bill Sudafed,
  • 44:44but these are all medications
  • 44:46that work similarly to turn off
  • 44:49the oxygen sensing pathway.
  • 44:50The other medications that we use in kidney
  • 44:53cancer are generally things that turn
  • 44:55on the immune system in one way or the other.
  • 44:57And this sounds like a distinction without
  • 44:59a difference, but is it difference?
  • 45:01And that's how I'm going to end this
  • 45:02by talking about the difference.
  • 45:04Oops, one are things that actually
  • 45:06activate the immune system and turn on,
  • 45:08and the other type are ones that prevent
  • 45:11the immune system from being turned off.
  • 45:13Notably, these things are all pills,
  • 45:16everything else is actually given by vein,
  • 45:19and the last thing is we do not use
  • 45:21chemotherapy and kidney cancer.
  • 45:23It does not work there.
  • 45:24Various theories where it doesn't work,
  • 45:25which we can talk about,
  • 45:26but it just doesn't work,
  • 45:27so we don't use it.
  • 45:29But all the other drugs,
  • 45:30aside from the ones that are mentioned
  • 45:32that through with oxygen sensing in DHL
  • 45:34they have to do with the immune system.
  • 45:36Alright,
  • 45:36let's talk a little bit about immunity.
  • 45:40The immune system is something
  • 45:41that all it does.
  • 45:42Its whole job is to distinguish
  • 45:44the self from foreigners and then
  • 45:45mostly to get rid of foreigners.
  • 45:47So the way you distinguish yourself
  • 45:49is that every cell in our body
  • 45:52is continuously taking bits of
  • 45:54the cell from the inside,
  • 45:56sticking them on the surface
  • 45:58and telling our immune system.
  • 46:00This is part of the immune system called
  • 46:01T cells and saying, hey, this is me.
  • 46:04I'm part of us and T cells
  • 46:08generally the ones that.
  • 46:10That used to recognize this stuff.
  • 46:12They mostly gone away because if a T
  • 46:14cell recognizes something strongly,
  • 46:16it tries to kill it, OK?
  • 46:18And that's sort of how immunity works.
  • 46:20So when you get a bacterial,
  • 46:22let's say that invades one of your cells.
  • 46:24The cell doesn't just show bits of itself,
  • 46:26it also shows bits of the bacteria and
  • 46:29that he saw may recognize that and say,
  • 46:31oh, this is a problem.
  • 46:32I better kill that cell because
  • 46:34it harbors bad bacteria.
  • 46:36Turns out that isn't enough.
  • 46:38You need a second signal and that 2nd signal.
  • 46:41Don't worry about the name of it,
  • 46:43but you need a second signal.
  • 46:44Basically cells that are invaded
  • 46:46by bad things send out a second
  • 46:48flag saying not only do they show
  • 46:50you the bacteria is part of it,
  • 46:53but they say something is going very
  • 46:54wrong and that's recognized by the
  • 46:56immune system, particularly T cells,
  • 46:57and that turns them on.
  • 46:59We call that costimulation and
  • 47:01this is the hopefully the
  • 47:04end point. Oh oh,
  • 47:05there we go that's over,
  • 47:07it kills it and that's the
  • 47:10way the immune system works.
  • 47:11Why am I talking about this?
  • 47:12What does it have to do with cancer?
  • 47:14Oh sorry, before I get to that
  • 47:16there are two other things in
  • 47:18addition to having that thing called
  • 47:21costimulation that turns it on.
  • 47:22We also have things that turn the
  • 47:24immune system off 'cause you don't
  • 47:25want the immune system on all the time,
  • 47:27and one way is to block the flag.
  • 47:31The T cell blocks that flag with
  • 47:33this protein and with it the T
  • 47:35cell doesn't recognize it anymore.
  • 47:36And another way is that we have
  • 47:38another set of thing called PD One
  • 47:40and PDL one and that also is a
  • 47:42signal that says turn T cells on.
  • 47:44OK. Getting back to cancer.
  • 47:48So as I said,
  • 47:50we distinguish ourselves from
  • 47:51foreigners by taking bits of us,
  • 47:53putting them on our surfaces,
  • 47:55and it's not recognized by the immune system.
  • 47:58But when you have cancer.
  • 48:00The cancer cells are abnormal and
  • 48:03a lot of what's on their insides
  • 48:04are abnormal and they put that on
  • 48:06the surface and it's recognized
  • 48:08as foreign by the T cell.
  • 48:10So I said that those two other
  • 48:12types of things that we used to
  • 48:14kill cancer that we use for to treat
  • 48:17them are both immune modulators
  • 48:18in one way that we did,
  • 48:19it was to turn T cells on the most.
  • 48:23The best examples.
  • 48:23I called interleukin 2.
  • 48:24We still use it,
  • 48:25but not that commonly anymore.
  • 48:27It doesn't work that well to be honest.
  • 48:29We can talk about that.
  • 48:30More people have questions,
  • 48:31but basically just activating the cell on on,
  • 48:34on, on, on, on in.
  • 48:36That works somewhat,
  • 48:37but we found that works much,
  • 48:38much,
  • 48:39much better really.
  • 48:40And more consistently is to stop
  • 48:43the signals that turn T cells off,
  • 48:46and that's what most of the
  • 48:48medications we use nowadays are.
  • 48:52So whoops, sorry folks.
  • 48:56OK, so going back to our
  • 48:57treatments and then I'm going to.
  • 48:59Then I'm going to end.
  • 49:01We have we can treat by blocking oxygen
  • 49:05sensing which turns off the cell division.
  • 49:08Probably of those cells.
  • 49:09The cancer cells and also prevents
  • 49:11a lot of blood vessel formation,
  • 49:12which is important for kidney cancers.
  • 49:14We can. Turned the immune system on,
  • 49:17but again these are have a lot of toxicities.
  • 49:20They don't work that well.
  • 49:21They can only be done by specialists
  • 49:23at very specialized centers.
  • 49:25We do it here, but most places don't
  • 49:27and then there's this large group.
  • 49:28There's other group of sort of growing
  • 49:30group of drugs that prevent the
  • 49:32immune system from being turned off,
  • 49:34and to be brief,
  • 49:36we use these a lot.
  • 49:38We use these a lot and we use them in
  • 49:40combinations because in combinations
  • 49:41they work better than working alone and
  • 49:44that's what I was going to say today.
  • 49:46Oh sorry,
  • 49:47the last thing I was going to talk
  • 49:49about was why don't therapies work?
  • 49:50We've all had friends or or or even us.
  • 49:54We have cancer therapy works
  • 49:56and then it stops working.
  • 49:58So one reason that things stop working
  • 50:01is what I said before about cancers.
  • 50:02Remember how I said that every time
  • 50:04the cells divide you can develop
  • 50:06new mutations in every cell that is
  • 50:09different mutations is essentially
  • 50:10a different is going to act
  • 50:12differently and so at some point,
  • 50:14even though you're controlling
  • 50:15a lot of the growth,
  • 50:16you're going to get growth of things that
  • 50:18are resistant because they're different.
  • 50:20The other thing that's really important
  • 50:23is that cancers have the ability
  • 50:25overtime by mutating to develop
  • 50:27evasion from the immune system.
  • 50:29Another reason why it's hard
  • 50:30to treat cancers,
  • 50:31why therapies don't work is that parks.
  • 50:34The tumors aren't getting
  • 50:35a blood supply very well,
  • 50:36so they're not getting a lot of drug into.
  • 50:38Treat them,
  • 50:38and tumors are actually under pressure,
  • 50:41so there it's really hard to get drug in,
  • 50:42and that's a major reason why big tumors,
  • 50:44especially that have a lot of what's
  • 50:47called necrosis or cell death in them,
  • 50:49aren't very well treated.
  • 50:51And lastly,
  • 50:52many of the tumors that we have
  • 50:55tumor cells that we have a lot of.
  • 50:56The cells are very,
  • 50:58very slow growing.
  • 50:59It's very hard to kill things
  • 51:01that are slow growing for various
  • 51:02reasons that we can talk about.
  • 51:04With that thanks for listening.
  • 51:06I don't know if there are any questions,
  • 51:08but I will stop sharing.
  • 51:12If I went way over or
  • 51:14no, that's a wonderful overview.
  • 51:16I think on the foundations of cancer,
  • 51:18which is a really good thing to understand,
  • 51:20and there's definitely comments in
  • 51:21the chat about how that fundamental
  • 51:22understanding is helpful for most people.
  • 51:24Is it and are really good level as well
  • 51:26to understand the process that's going
  • 51:28on and then to talk about treatments?
  • 51:31A couple questions have come up,
  • 51:32so the first is about Opdivo
  • 51:35therapy specifically.
  • 51:36So immunotherapy and you hear a lot about it.
  • 51:38And there's a just a a base question.
  • 51:40Does it actually cure cancer?
  • 51:43Yeah, so at Devo is one of the ones I put
  • 51:45there so because we're sort of academic,
  • 51:47we don't put the trade names.
  • 51:49We only put the names of the drugs that are
  • 51:52that that are sort of the generic names.
  • 51:54New volume AB is up Devo and
  • 51:57there are probably cures,
  • 51:59especially with combinations of
  • 52:01Opdivo and this other guy let me Mab.
  • 52:05It's hard to say definitively, honestly,
  • 52:07because can't kidney cancers can come back.
  • 52:09Many, many, many years later,
  • 52:11and we probably first started treating people
  • 52:14with these drugs about 10-12 years ago.
  • 52:17You know, maybe a few patients were treated
  • 52:20a little bit before that but but but yeah,
  • 52:22there are people who appear to
  • 52:25be cured from that. And
  • 52:27so another one is sort of
  • 52:29clarification about terminology.
  • 52:30It's someone who that is so bad.
  • 52:33Yeah, yeah. So the question was the patient
  • 52:34we we got cabozantinib the paperwork
  • 52:36we received indicated chemotherapy.
  • 52:38Is that the question that you're asking?
  • 52:40Yeah, that was terrible on my part.
  • 52:42I apologize so. You know, I'm.
  • 52:45Chemotherapy is a very
  • 52:47poorly bandied about term,
  • 52:50so chemotherapy originally was discussed.
  • 52:53It was described in the 1960s and it
  • 52:55was because we have radiation therapy.
  • 52:58We have surgical therapy, but are we
  • 52:59going to call therapy with medicines?
  • 53:01We'll call it chemotherapy.
  • 53:04That and then in the 70s and 80s
  • 53:06chemotherapy became this thing that
  • 53:07people think about as drugs given
  • 53:09by vein that caused nausea and
  • 53:10hair loss and act in a certain way.
  • 53:13You are absolutely right.
  • 53:14All of its chemotherapy.
  • 53:15What I was talking about,
  • 53:17and it was not being clear.
  • 53:18We don't use traditional chemotherapy
  • 53:20or what we call cytotoxic chemotherapy.
  • 53:23That is a little bit less specific,
  • 53:26but kills abnormally growing cells.
  • 53:29So
  • 53:29there's a couple more questions.
  • 53:31One is about biomarkers analogy.
  • 53:32Talk about that a little
  • 53:34bit in the next session.
  • 53:35There's a couple more questions,
  • 53:36so one that's what that come up.
  • 53:38That's sort of more general is
  • 53:39sort of the importance about being
  • 53:41treated as sort of a center of
  • 53:43excellence and academic center.
  • 53:44That sort of sees a lot of kidney cancer.
  • 53:46And maybe if you could speak
  • 53:47a little bit about that,
  • 53:48why that might be helpful in certain cases.
  • 53:50Yeah, so so I think that the job
  • 53:54of a general oncologist is almost
  • 53:56impossible that there's so much to know.
  • 53:59And not only do you have to
  • 54:01know every single disease,
  • 54:02but you don't have other people
  • 54:03floating around you who do
  • 54:05other things that are relevant.
  • 54:06So one of the great great joys of my
  • 54:09existence is when something that I
  • 54:10have no idea that comes up that may
  • 54:13have to do with localized treatment
  • 54:14or with taking something out.
  • 54:16I can call Pat and and and he's right
  • 54:19there just to answer it and and so
  • 54:21one of the things that you get from
  • 54:23going to a center of excellence is
  • 54:25that there are a lot of us around.
  • 54:27We all can communicate with each other and.
  • 54:29We have as a group.
  • 54:31We have seen a huge amount of
  • 54:34different things.
  • 54:35The other thing is that because
  • 54:37people like Doctor Braun and
  • 54:39and and Doctor Cooper and I.
  • 54:40Really only treat one or two diseases
  • 54:43or my case for diseases or whatever.
  • 54:46You see a lot of the same thing,
  • 54:48and you've probably seen a
  • 54:50lot more of things.
  • 54:51Maybe sometimes we're a little more
  • 54:53up to date because we can follow only
  • 54:56four things rather than 100 things,
  • 54:58but I think the best thing
  • 54:59about the center is just the
  • 55:01multidisciplinary features we have.
  • 55:03Pat,
  • 55:03we have pathologists who know
  • 55:05a ton about the stuff who can
  • 55:07really tell us what we're looking
  • 55:08at under the microscope,
  • 55:09and sometimes other people can't.
  • 55:11Frankly,
  • 55:11we have fantastic radiologists who
  • 55:13are using with a lot of cancer and
  • 55:15we have interventional radiologists
  • 55:16who can do amazing things.
  • 55:18And radiation oncologists who know
  • 55:19how to deal with kidney cancer.
  • 55:21And many don't because it's not thought
  • 55:23to be a radiation treated disease,
  • 55:25even though in many ways it is.
  • 55:27That would be my answer.
  • 55:28I'm sure everyone else has a
  • 55:29has his own or her own answer.
  • 55:31I couldn't agree with you more Michael.
  • 55:33I mean, I, I think there's
  • 55:35there's other specialties too that
  • 55:37don't immediately come to mind.
  • 55:40You know, we have nephrology team here,
  • 55:43including someone who
  • 55:44specializes in onco nephrology.
  • 55:46So nephrology is medical doctors
  • 55:47for the kidney for chronic.
  • 55:49Kidney disease that we
  • 55:50had talked about earlier,
  • 55:51and there's someone who specializes
  • 55:53in that in patients with cancer.
  • 55:55That's an extraordinary resource
  • 55:56from a surgical standpoint.
  • 55:58I had put up a slide very
  • 56:00briefly about tumor thrombus,
  • 56:02or, you know,
  • 56:03other that's when the tumor can extend even
  • 56:06up into the heart as a General Hospital,
  • 56:09right?
  • 56:09We have a we have liver transplant
  • 56:12programs and liver transplant surgeons.
  • 56:13We have cardiac surgeons who are
  • 56:16extraordinarily experienced,
  • 56:17and we can call on those resources
  • 56:19when we need to.
  • 56:20And that's something that I think
  • 56:22is really pretty incredible,
  • 56:23so the advantage even just
  • 56:26having trainees around,
  • 56:28there's a lot of data that having
  • 56:29trainees around helps improve outcomes.
  • 56:31There's something really kind of
  • 56:33magic in the water and and hopefully.
  • 56:38That translates into better
  • 56:39outcomes and hopefully better care.
  • 56:42Now when you think of even this call,
  • 56:43we have, you know, urology surgery.
  • 56:45We have medical oncology.
  • 56:46We have genetics.
  • 56:47We have even this one call.
  • 56:49Sort of a a few different specialties
  • 56:51represented and so I think that's
  • 56:52something unique about places like Yale
  • 56:53and then these centers of excellence.
  • 56:55I really, really enable that.
  • 56:57So maybe in the interest of time we
  • 56:59might move forward a little bit.
  • 57:00I think there's still a couple of questions,
  • 57:01but I think we'll hopefully have time
  • 57:02at the end to loop back to those.
  • 57:04Yeah David, you can answer
  • 57:05some of those when you're done.
  • 57:06Maybe if there are more
  • 57:07questions for you specifically,
  • 57:08'cause I see what they are.
  • 57:11So you're up
  • 57:12OK. Can you see my screen?
  • 57:13OK? Yep, OK great.
  • 57:16So I'm tasked with a relatively large topic,
  • 57:19which is to talk about researching
  • 57:21kidney cancer and really the focus
  • 57:22of what I'm going to talk about is
  • 57:24basic and translational research.
  • 57:25That's often research that's
  • 57:27done in a laboratory bench,
  • 57:29and that's brought back to patients.
  • 57:31So try to think about how we can
  • 57:33better understand the disease,
  • 57:34and most importantly,
  • 57:34how we can better, better treat it.
  • 57:36There's a lot to cover,
  • 57:38so I'm going to warn you in advance.
  • 57:40I'm going to editorialize.
  • 57:41A fair bit of, uh,
  • 57:42what I think I should have some of the
  • 57:44big open questions in kidney cancer and
  • 57:46just a little bit a little taste of it.
  • 57:48How we are beginning to address it.
  • 57:50And there's a huge amount
  • 57:51of research going on.
  • 57:52A lot that I won't be able to cover here,
  • 57:54but hopefully my my my real hope for
  • 57:56this sort of talk is to give you kind
  • 57:57of a sense of the excitement in the
  • 57:59field about how much things are changing,
  • 58:01how much things,
  • 58:02how many things are being studied,
  • 58:04and how I think the future is
  • 58:06very bright for this disease.
  • 58:08So I think before we get started,
  • 58:10it's helpful to take a step back
  • 58:12and I always think to sort of
  • 58:14know where you're going you have
  • 58:15to sort of know where you came
  • 58:17from and so to take a step back.
  • 58:18Not that long ago. 20 years ago.
  • 58:22To look at what kidney cancer
  • 58:25treatment was like that.
  • 58:27Like this?
  • 58:29Sorry about that.
  • 58:37Are you able to see the screen
  • 58:39out right now? Yeah, perfect.
  • 58:45I apologize, computed,
  • 58:47decided a bad time to freeze so
  • 58:50try one more time to restart this.
  • 58:56My apologies.
  • 59:06How about now?
  • 59:07Perfect, it's perfect, OK?
  • 59:09Third times the charm.
  • 59:10Thank you everyone sticking with me,
  • 59:12so I'm saying I think it's really
  • 59:14helpful to look historically.
  • 59:15But what kidney cancer treatment was like?
  • 59:17You know, just 20 years ago,
  • 59:19and so if we look at the historical data
  • 59:21and this is largely patients treated with
  • 59:23as doctor her which was saying things
  • 59:26like interferon and high dose I'll two.
  • 59:28And again we show a survival curve.
  • 59:29This is something that doctor
  • 59:31Kenny showed which is.
  • 59:32Shown over time,
  • 59:33the number of patients that are
  • 59:35surviving at one year or 12 months,
  • 59:37two years, three years,
  • 59:39four years or five years,
  • 59:40and unfortunately,
  • 59:4120 years ago we saw this curve
  • 59:43drop down quickly and so that we
  • 59:45if we go to that five year mark
  • 59:47that 60 month Mark we see you as
  • 59:49in the single digits in terms of
  • 59:50the number of patients who are
  • 59:51actually surviving that long.
  • 59:53With advanced kidney cancers,
  • 59:54probably around 5 to 10%.
  • 59:56Now if we contrast that with
  • 59:58some of the modern therapies,
  • 59:59we have the the ones that
  • 01:00:00doctor Hurwitz mentioned,
  • 01:00:01like Epilim AB and volume
  • 01:00:03of these immuno therapies.
  • 01:00:04We're starting to have longer follow-up,
  • 01:00:06so five year follow-up of of
  • 01:00:08those two drugs together.
  • 01:00:09Some of you call that Nebo and hippie,
  • 01:00:11and we see a dramatic improvement.
  • 01:00:13Now, 40%,
  • 01:00:15nearly half of people with
  • 01:00:18advanced kidney cancer are alive.
  • 01:00:20Five years later.
  • 01:00:21This is an incredible improvement,
  • 01:00:23but also,
  • 01:00:24I think shows the road that we still
  • 01:00:26need to take in the the sort of
  • 01:00:28mountain we over we need to overcome.
  • 01:00:3048 percent is incredibly
  • 01:00:32different from 5 or 7%.
  • 01:00:35But it's not 50%, it's not 70%.
  • 01:00:37It's not 90%,
  • 01:00:38and it's just we sell a huge way to go.
  • 01:00:41And that's where really fundamental
  • 01:00:42research into the disease comes into play.
  • 01:00:45And so out of all of the
  • 01:00:47potential areas of research,
  • 01:00:48there's a couple that I
  • 01:00:49really want to focus on,
  • 01:00:50and these are some of the what I think
  • 01:00:52of as this of critical questions.
  • 01:00:53The big open questions in kidney cancer.
  • 01:00:56One of them was actually brought
  • 01:00:57up in the chat,
  • 01:00:58which is a great segue.
  • 01:01:00One is how do we select the right
  • 01:01:01drug for the right patients?
  • 01:01:02We know one drug might not work for everyone.
  • 01:01:05This drug might drug.
  • 01:01:06He might work for a group of people.
  • 01:01:08Drug B might work for a different
  • 01:01:09group of people.
  • 01:01:10So how do we select that right
  • 01:01:11drug for the right patient?
  • 01:01:12Another word for that as biomarker,
  • 01:01:14a test we can do.
  • 01:01:16To try to select the right therapy.
  • 01:01:19The second is how do we increase that
  • 01:01:21number of patients with long term survival?
  • 01:01:23I showed what I called the tale
  • 01:01:24of the curve that was sort of
  • 01:01:26flattening out overtime where you
  • 01:01:28know nearly half of patients.
  • 01:01:2948% of patients were alive five years later,
  • 01:01:32but 48% is not 70%.
  • 01:01:34So how can we continue to
  • 01:01:35increase that number?
  • 01:01:36And I would argue that understanding
  • 01:01:38as as doctor Hertz was talking about
  • 01:01:40how the immune biology of kidney
  • 01:01:42cancer works and understanding other
  • 01:01:44elements of biology to develop new
  • 01:01:46therapies is going to be critical.
  • 01:01:49As Doctor Hurwitz mentioned, getting anti PD,
  • 01:01:52one therapy or immune based therapy is
  • 01:01:54not really a standard in kidney cancer.
  • 01:01:56Most patients with advanced clear cell kidney
  • 01:01:59cancer would receive this but unfortunately
  • 01:02:01many patients ultimately progress.
  • 01:02:03I'll the the therapy stops working
  • 01:02:05after a certain amount of time and so
  • 01:02:07another huge challenge is what do we
  • 01:02:09do next after we've we've used that
  • 01:02:11that really potent medicine.
  • 01:02:12What are other options that
  • 01:02:13we might be able to do?
  • 01:02:15And this is where thinking about
  • 01:02:16new types of treatment and really
  • 01:02:17understanding the disease.
  • 01:02:18Biology is important.
  • 01:02:20And lastly,
  • 01:02:21I'll talk just very briefly about variant
  • 01:02:23histologies or what's historically known
  • 01:02:25as sort of non clear cell kidney cancer.
  • 01:02:27I would think it's never good to be just
  • 01:02:29defined by something that you're not,
  • 01:02:30so this is the bucket of diseases
  • 01:02:32that doctor Kenny was mentioning,
  • 01:02:33which are individually uncommon,
  • 01:02:36but in aggregate make up about
  • 01:02:3925% of all renal cell carcinomas.
  • 01:02:41And honestly we extrapolate a lot.
  • 01:02:44We don't know how to treat individual
  • 01:02:45ones nearly as well as we do clears.
  • 01:02:47Also,
  • 01:02:47we borrow a lot of the same drugs and so.
  • 01:02:50How can we do a better job of
  • 01:02:52treating those specific diseases?
  • 01:02:54So we'll tackle these one at a time and
  • 01:02:55it's gonna be a little bit of a worldwind.
  • 01:02:57'cause again,
  • 01:02:58I just want to give a sort of a hint
  • 01:02:59of flavor of kind of the research
  • 01:03:01going on so one is how do we select
  • 01:03:03the right drug for the right patient?
  • 01:03:04How do we develop biomarkers and the
  • 01:03:06true answer is for kidney cancer.
  • 01:03:07This has not been nearly as successful.
  • 01:03:09If you think of things like advanced
  • 01:03:11lung cancer, they have to have a much,
  • 01:03:13much more success in picking up DNA
  • 01:03:15changes or mutations that might serve
  • 01:03:17as a marker for responsiveness to drugs.
  • 01:03:20This is true of other tumor types as well.
  • 01:03:23Kidney cancer has not been there.
  • 01:03:24That,
  • 01:03:24but my hope is that with a lot
  • 01:03:26of the new tools that are coming
  • 01:03:28out in the laboratory,
  • 01:03:29that might ultimately translate into
  • 01:03:30tools we can use to develop biomarkers
  • 01:03:33and select and so I have a what I think
  • 01:03:35is a little bit of a silly cartoon,
  • 01:03:37but hopefully start hammers home.
  • 01:03:39Why this is a really difficult problem.
  • 01:03:41So we have two patients.
  • 01:03:43One of them has a tumor that responds
  • 01:03:46really well to therapy that's in blue.
  • 01:03:48One has a tumor that in Portuguese resisted
  • 01:03:50the therapy, and when we want to study it,
  • 01:03:52to try to come up with a biomarker
  • 01:03:54to try to figure out.
  • 01:03:55What's going on now?
  • 01:03:56If we look at the tumor itself,
  • 01:03:58we think as a tumor is just one thing.
  • 01:04:00It's not.
  • 01:04:01It's actually a collection of many different
  • 01:04:03types of cells within that tumor itself.
  • 01:04:05Within that mass that we've
  • 01:04:08seen as tumor cells munss else,
  • 01:04:10other supportive cells,
  • 01:04:12blood vessels.
  • 01:04:13And there's a lot of heterogeneity
  • 01:04:15differences between them.
  • 01:04:16But what do we typically do
  • 01:04:17when we want to study that?
  • 01:04:18Even with things like sequencing,
  • 01:04:20we put that all in a blender and what comes
  • 01:04:22out on the other side looks like this.
  • 01:04:24It's all looks.
  • 01:04:25Pretty much the same when you blend
  • 01:04:27it together and then we try to look
  • 01:04:29back and squint and say why did one
  • 01:04:31drug work for one patient and one
  • 01:04:33drug not work for another patient,
  • 01:04:35when in actuality we're really having a hard
  • 01:04:37time after we blend everything together,
  • 01:04:40picking out the individual cells in a tumor?
  • 01:04:42The Kiwi that might be responsible
  • 01:04:44for a drug working,
  • 01:04:45or the strawberry that might be
  • 01:04:47responsible for drug not working.
  • 01:04:48And so this is a silly example,
  • 01:04:49but kind of gets to the hint that the
  • 01:04:51the idea that we really have to look at
  • 01:04:53the cells individually and so there's
  • 01:04:54now new tools that enable us to do that and.
  • 01:04:57So we began to do that in various domains,
  • 01:05:00and so we've we've started to do that and
  • 01:05:03not the problem of this drug work or not.
  • 01:05:06But how does a kidney cancer progress,
  • 01:05:08and so the way we did that was to
  • 01:05:09take patients and their tumors who
  • 01:05:11had either early stage disease.
  • 01:05:13As Doctor Kenny mentioned things that were
  • 01:05:15really confined to the kidney locally.
  • 01:05:17To answer that just began to spread,
  • 01:05:19or patients who had tumors that were
  • 01:05:21more advanced that really had spread
  • 01:05:23to distant sites or or metastatic.
  • 01:05:24And we actually broke those
  • 01:05:26tumors down into individual.
  • 01:05:27Cells and sequence 1 cell at a time and
  • 01:05:30that's what this sort of cloud of dots shows.
  • 01:05:32Each of these individual dots is actually
  • 01:05:34one individual cell from a kidney tumor,
  • 01:05:37and we can use that information to
  • 01:05:39try to say what is actually there.
  • 01:05:41What's different between an advanced
  • 01:05:43kidney cancer versus an early
  • 01:05:44cancer as it starts to spread?
  • 01:05:46And how are the the communications
  • 01:05:48that Doctor Hurwitz talked about?
  • 01:05:49The how do the cells talk to each other?
  • 01:05:51How does that differ between more
  • 01:05:54advanced cancer in earlier stage cancer?
  • 01:05:56That's what we've we've been working on.
  • 01:05:58Now we're we're really working on
  • 01:06:00the next step, which is to say,
  • 01:06:01OK,
  • 01:06:01can we use these newer and advanced
  • 01:06:03tools to begin to ask those questions of
  • 01:06:06why certain drugs work that they don't?
  • 01:06:08What are the?
  • 01:06:09What's the underlying biology?
  • 01:06:10What's changing in the way?
  • 01:06:12Cells talk to each other between a tumor
  • 01:06:14that responds really well to immunotherapy,
  • 01:06:16and one that unfortunately seems resistant.
  • 01:06:18And that's work that our collaborative
  • 01:06:20group with Doctor Hurwitz and and Doctor
  • 01:06:22Ken and everyone is working on together.
  • 01:06:26A second big open question
  • 01:06:27is how do we do better?
  • 01:06:29How do we get that 48% of
  • 01:06:30patients who might be having a
  • 01:06:32survival out of five years to
  • 01:06:3470% to 80% higher and higher?
  • 01:06:36And I think again the the
  • 01:06:38key is really understanding
  • 01:06:39the biology with the scenes.
  • 01:06:43The the steps that need to happen
  • 01:06:45for the immune system to actually
  • 01:06:47work and recognize eliminate tumor.
  • 01:06:49I think Doctor Howard did a
  • 01:06:50really good job outlining that,
  • 01:06:51but it's a really complicated process
  • 01:06:53that the cancer has to actually
  • 01:06:55release targets that the immune
  • 01:06:57system can recognize that the immune
  • 01:06:59system has to pick it up has to
  • 01:07:01take it and deliver it to the right
  • 01:07:03cell that's able to recognize it,
  • 01:07:05but that immune cell has to
  • 01:07:07then recognize it, turn on,
  • 01:07:09travel back to the tumor,
  • 01:07:11actually get into the tumor,
  • 01:07:12and actually be able to attack him.
  • 01:07:13Go to ourselves.
  • 01:07:14There's a lot of things that have
  • 01:07:16to go right and we really have to
  • 01:07:17critically understand what are all the
  • 01:07:19things that need to go right in order
  • 01:07:21to effectively design immune therapies.
  • 01:07:24As Doctor Hurwitz mentioned.
  • 01:07:25These cells talk to each other
  • 01:07:28and he mentioned he showed one
  • 01:07:30really good example of EGF.
  • 01:07:32I'm showing here probably 20
  • 01:07:33examples of waste cells of the in the
  • 01:07:36tumor actually talk to each other,
  • 01:07:37and if you can believe it,
  • 01:07:38this is actually a really simplified diagram,
  • 01:07:41and so what's going on is a lot
  • 01:07:42of lot of complicated cross stop,
  • 01:07:45and this is what's going to be
  • 01:07:47critical to understand how cells
  • 01:07:48talk to each other and when a tumor
  • 01:07:50responds really well to therapy,
  • 01:07:52what are those connections?
  • 01:07:53Or what conversations are happening and when?
  • 01:07:56Appropriate therapy doesn't work.
  • 01:07:58What are the different conversations
  • 01:08:00that happen in that case?
  • 01:08:02The other area that we go on,
  • 01:08:03we've talked about a lot about
  • 01:08:05Immunomodulation, which is, you know,
  • 01:08:07either slamming on the gas pedal,
  • 01:08:09things like Hydrocele 2,
  • 01:08:10which really work to to turn on
  • 01:08:12the immune system or taking away
  • 01:08:14some of those checkpoints,
  • 01:08:16immune checkpoint inhibition,
  • 01:08:17which essentially serves to release or
  • 01:08:19cut the brakes and let them use some.
  • 01:08:21Let them use system go.
  • 01:08:23I think moving forward we want
  • 01:08:25to try to get a little bit more
  • 01:08:26specific in the way to potentially
  • 01:08:28do that is to add a steering wheel.
  • 01:08:29If we think of those older therapies
  • 01:08:31like I'll 2 is really the gas pedal
  • 01:08:34and newer therapies like no volume AB
  • 01:08:36and pembrolizumab as releasing the brakes.
  • 01:08:38The question is,
  • 01:08:39can we actually make the therapy more
  • 01:08:40precise and add that steering wheel?
  • 01:08:42There's lots of different ways to do that.
  • 01:08:44This had been trials here at Yale and
  • 01:08:46elsewhere that have explored cancer
  • 01:08:47vaccines that really try to steer the
  • 01:08:49immune system specifically towards the tumor,
  • 01:08:51but there's really a whole world of ways.
  • 01:08:54To really target the tumor directly,
  • 01:08:56the tumor, the thing in the tumor that they
  • 01:08:59need to recognize is called an antigen,
  • 01:09:01and so can we design antigen directed
  • 01:09:04therapies, things like CAR T cells,
  • 01:09:06which are a lot in the news,
  • 01:09:08vaccines, other approaches,
  • 01:09:10and afterwards.
  • 01:09:11Actually a lot of experience working
  • 01:09:13with these cell based therapies in
  • 01:09:15many different contexts to try to
  • 01:09:17figure out how we can get towards
  • 01:09:19antigen directed therapies.
  • 01:09:21So, next briefly, you know we,
  • 01:09:23we hope that we start off in a patient who
  • 01:09:27has metastatic disease with an anti PD,
  • 01:09:29one based therapy.
  • 01:09:30But unfortunately for many patients
  • 01:09:31that ultimately stops working.
  • 01:09:33So what can we do after that?
  • 01:09:34And that's where I think really
  • 01:09:36thinking about the biology of
  • 01:09:38the tumor is really important.
  • 01:09:39Doctor Hurwitz really outlined
  • 01:09:41very nicely the types of therapy
  • 01:09:42that we use and when we think about
  • 01:09:44the systemic therapies that we
  • 01:09:46use for clear cell kidney cancer,
  • 01:09:47there really are certain pillars
  • 01:09:49that Doctor Harris talked about.
  • 01:09:50There's immunotherapy,
  • 01:09:51which I would argue is really
  • 01:09:52a strong backbone.
  • 01:09:53Now there's those anti angiogenic,
  • 01:09:55those those pills that help to block
  • 01:09:58new blood vessels from forming,
  • 01:09:59essentially helping to starve
  • 01:10:01the tumor of food.
  • 01:10:02But we really need a new a new pillar.
  • 01:10:05We need a new target and that's
  • 01:10:06really been lacking and the way that
  • 01:10:08we're starting to get there is by
  • 01:10:10understanding the biology of the disease.
  • 01:10:11And this is going to be a slightly
  • 01:10:13more complicated version than
  • 01:10:15Doctor Hurwitz had really kindly
  • 01:10:16pointed out really nicely pointed
  • 01:10:18out about how cells sense oxygen,
  • 01:10:20and I bring up this slightly
  • 01:10:21more complicated version,
  • 01:10:22and this is a a system that
  • 01:10:24was worked out by a number of
  • 01:10:26investigators and actually led to
  • 01:10:28the Nobel Prize in medicine in 2019.
  • 01:10:30Just because it is complicated.
  • 01:10:32And that's why I think the fundamental
  • 01:10:34research that the basic biology so important,
  • 01:10:37because that's what ultimately
  • 01:10:38leads to these new therapies.
  • 01:10:40So as Doctor Hurwitz had mentioned.
  • 01:10:42Under normal oxygen condition,
  • 01:10:43so we have oxygen floating around normoxia,
  • 01:10:46then VHL is active and it helps to
  • 01:10:49basically breakdown thrown to the trash.
  • 01:10:52Certain proteins like HIF two and
  • 01:10:54HIP two ends up being really a key
  • 01:10:56protein for clear cell kidney cancer.
  • 01:10:59In normal parts of our body.
  • 01:11:00If we don't have enough oxygen
  • 01:11:02then the HL is not active,
  • 01:11:04it's turned off as Doctor Hurwitz
  • 01:11:06said this hip two is then it's
  • 01:11:08not thrown in the trash anymore.
  • 01:11:10It can go and do its job which is
  • 01:11:11to make new blood vessels or empty.
  • 01:11:13Angiogenesis helped the cells
  • 01:11:15grow and survive.
  • 01:11:17In clear cell kidney cancer,
  • 01:11:19we know that this VHL protein is missing
  • 01:11:21and so this hip is on all the time
  • 01:11:23and so even when it's not supposed to,
  • 01:11:25the cells are grown new blood vessels.
  • 01:11:28They're growing themselves.
  • 01:11:29They're surviving.
  • 01:11:30They're becoming clear cell kidney cancer,
  • 01:11:32and so this.
  • 01:11:33Now when we know we know this biology,
  • 01:11:36it's the natural question.
  • 01:11:37Can we just have a drug that
  • 01:11:39might help to shut off?
  • 01:11:40If too that might help to stop all these
  • 01:11:43things that are happening downstream,
  • 01:11:45and that's where a new drug
  • 01:11:46belzu dibbin which is.
  • 01:11:47Now approved for specific patients.
  • 01:11:49Really,
  • 01:11:50for patients with hereditary
  • 01:11:51kidney cancer with VHL syndrome,
  • 01:11:53but is being actively tested
  • 01:11:55more broadly and preliminarily,
  • 01:11:56has some encouraging results.
  • 01:11:58Really acts to block this hip
  • 01:12:00too and stop those down trip signals,
  • 01:12:03and so this is just an example
  • 01:12:04of how the basic biology really
  • 01:12:06understanding of fundamental process
  • 01:12:08like how our cells sends oxygen leads
  • 01:12:10to advancements in kidney cancer.
  • 01:12:14The other thing I just want to briefly
  • 01:12:16mention is I talk a lot about new
  • 01:12:17drugs and new technologies and those
  • 01:12:19are things that I'm excited about,
  • 01:12:20but I think there's also the
  • 01:12:21question can we just optimize?
  • 01:12:22Can we actually do better
  • 01:12:23with the things that we have?
  • 01:12:25And this is something from when I
  • 01:12:27was at at Dana Farber in the past.
  • 01:12:28That always sort of struck me.
  • 01:12:29This is borrowing a lesson
  • 01:12:31from pediatric leukemia,
  • 01:12:32so these are survival curves that children,
  • 01:12:34unfortunately with pediatric
  • 01:12:36leukemia and trials done at Dana
  • 01:12:38Farber in the nineteen 1973,
  • 01:12:40nineteen 7719, eighty 1985.
  • 01:12:43So over the course around 15 years.
  • 01:12:45And we can see this is a dramatic
  • 01:12:48improvement that in the 1973 less than
  • 01:12:50half of fewer than half of children with
  • 01:12:52leukemia were surviving by the mid 80s,
  • 01:12:54nearly 80% were what I found so
  • 01:12:57remarkable about this is that
  • 01:12:58this was a period where there was
  • 01:13:00actually no new drug discovery.
  • 01:13:02This is all just optimizing
  • 01:13:03the drugs that they had,
  • 01:13:05and they had this dramatic
  • 01:13:07improvement in survival,
  • 01:13:08and so I think it's sometimes not.
  • 01:13:10As you know, it's not as hot a topic to say.
  • 01:13:11Let's just optimize what we have,
  • 01:13:13but that sometimes is one of
  • 01:13:15the most effective things.
  • 01:13:16And that started to be done in kidney cancer,
  • 01:13:18particularly for patients who had
  • 01:13:20received immunotherapy in the past.
  • 01:13:22People are beginning to ask,
  • 01:13:23can we actually just optimize
  • 01:13:24and tweak things?
  • 01:13:26You know,
  • 01:13:26a standard after someone got immune
  • 01:13:28therapy would be to get a drug like
  • 01:13:30tablets anti neighbor tivozanib.
  • 01:13:31So asking really simple
  • 01:13:33and fundamental questions.
  • 01:13:34Can we actually add another
  • 01:13:36immunotherapy agent to that?
  • 01:13:38Same that same drugs?
  • 01:13:40Or having Kevin cabozantinib alone,
  • 01:13:41can we actually add at Tesla Lizama?
  • 01:13:43Have another immunotherapy and
  • 01:13:44get a better response and how
  • 01:13:46patients to live longer.
  • 01:13:47There's multiple trials
  • 01:13:48that are exploring this,
  • 01:13:50but I think goes up with
  • 01:13:51the overall principle.
  • 01:13:52Can we optimize the tools that we have?
  • 01:13:55And then,
  • 01:13:55very briefly,
  • 01:13:56how do we treat these variant histologies?
  • 01:13:58Essentially everything I've
  • 01:13:59talked about so far is really
  • 01:14:01for clear cell kidney cancer,
  • 01:14:03but we know that 25% one and four renal
  • 01:14:05cell carcinomas are not clear cell.
  • 01:14:07There are these variant histologies
  • 01:14:09and you just look at them and
  • 01:14:11they are dramatically different,
  • 01:14:12so these are what they look like.
  • 01:14:15Both when you look at the tumor
  • 01:14:17itself and then next to it is what
  • 01:14:18they look like under the microscope
  • 01:14:20and I just have a couple of examples
  • 01:14:21of papillary tumor under microscope.
  • 01:14:23This one that type one.
  • 01:14:25This one is,
  • 01:14:26which is historically called a Type 2.
  • 01:14:28This is a chromophobe and you don't
  • 01:14:29have to be a pathologist to look at
  • 01:14:31these and say they look dramatically,
  • 01:14:33dramatically different.
  • 01:14:34They're really not the same disease.
  • 01:14:37And in a table similar to what doctor
  • 01:14:38Kenny and Doctor Hurwitz had shown,
  • 01:14:40these have a different biology
  • 01:14:41and so lumping them all
  • 01:14:42together and assuming they will act in
  • 01:14:44the same way and will respond to the exact
  • 01:14:46same treatment is probably just not right.
  • 01:14:48We really have to think about
  • 01:14:49how to do this intelligently,
  • 01:14:51and I think the field is really really
  • 01:14:53coming around and beginning to do this.
  • 01:14:54I think for the first time there
  • 01:14:56was a large trial is a large base,
  • 01:14:58two trial that really targeted specifically
  • 01:15:00papillary cancer and had a positive
  • 01:15:02result that was really encouraging,
  • 01:15:04and this has paved the way for new trials.
  • 01:15:06This is just.
  • 01:15:07One of many that are are starting to emerge.
  • 01:15:09This is something called the CIMETTA trial.
  • 01:15:11This is mostly when actually out of Europe,
  • 01:15:13but it's a trial where it's for patient,
  • 01:15:15specifically with papillary cancer,
  • 01:15:16and specifically even that
  • 01:15:18Type 1 papillary cancer.
  • 01:15:19So those that have a specific alteration
  • 01:15:22in the DNA ones that are driven by
  • 01:15:25this protein met and those those
  • 01:15:27patients which are very specifically
  • 01:15:29selected then are getting one of
  • 01:15:31three different types of therapies,
  • 01:15:33and so this is just one example
  • 01:15:34of an ongoing trial,
  • 01:15:35but gets the the overall point.
  • 01:15:37We have to better understand these tumors.
  • 01:15:39These variant histologies and that
  • 01:15:40we can't always lump them together.
  • 01:15:42We we really have to think about
  • 01:15:44how they're different and unique
  • 01:15:46and treat that individual biology.
  • 01:15:48And so that's briefly what we talked about.
  • 01:15:49Some of the big open questions and
  • 01:15:51research biomarker developments like
  • 01:15:52the right drug for the right patients,
  • 01:15:54getting more patients to survive long
  • 01:15:56term really hopefully get into that.
  • 01:15:58That word cure for more and more
  • 01:16:00and more patients.
  • 01:16:01How can we treat patients for which the
  • 01:16:03initial therapies haven't worked as well?
  • 01:16:05And how can we treat that one out of
  • 01:16:07four patients that don't have that
  • 01:16:08the classic clear cell kidney cancer
  • 01:16:10and the way we're hoping to do that
  • 01:16:12and and Yale by working between
  • 01:16:14physicians and and lab based scientists.
  • 01:16:17The way we're really hoping to do that.
  • 01:16:18Is through really a process of
  • 01:16:20bedside to bench and back again?
  • 01:16:22Kind of research and the the basic
  • 01:16:24idea here is that we work with
  • 01:16:26patients who are who are interested
  • 01:16:28in contributing to research.
  • 01:16:29We study their kidney cancer.
  • 01:16:31Specifically,
  • 01:16:31we go back through the lab and we
  • 01:16:33really try to learn things about their
  • 01:16:35kidney cancer about kidney cancer.
  • 01:16:37More generally,
  • 01:16:38we think about what are the new
  • 01:16:40questions that we have to answer
  • 01:16:42about improving immuno therapies
  • 01:16:43and other types of treatments.
  • 01:16:45We try to use that in a laboratory to
  • 01:16:47figure out how we're going to design better.
  • 01:16:49Diagnostic tests,
  • 01:16:50better biomarkers,
  • 01:16:51better therapies and then try to
  • 01:16:53actually bring that back to the
  • 01:16:55patient and translate that into better
  • 01:16:57therapies and better tests for patients.
  • 01:16:59And it's an iterative process
  • 01:17:00really going back and forth to try
  • 01:17:02to do this in continuous fashion,
  • 01:17:04and so with that I I'm thankful
  • 01:17:06to all the patients and families
  • 01:17:09and caregivers
  • 01:17:10who really this research is only
  • 01:17:12possible because of their generosity
  • 01:17:13and the medical providers that really
  • 01:17:15make it happen and happy at this time
  • 01:17:17to hopefully answer a few questions.
  • 01:17:20That's fantastic.
  • 01:17:20I think there's a little bit of time,
  • 01:17:22and then we'll go to Claire.
  • 01:17:23I don't care that I wanna know
  • 01:17:25what she's going to say so.
  • 01:17:26So let me start with some of the questions.
  • 01:17:29So one of the questions wasn't movie.
  • 01:17:30I'll be interesting to
  • 01:17:31see to hear your answer,
  • 01:17:32'cause our answers might differ
  • 01:17:34slightly is 1 combination of an
  • 01:17:36inib and a new mab better than
  • 01:17:38another for cancer that has spread.
  • 01:17:40So let me just clarify for one second,
  • 01:17:41for for the people there that
  • 01:17:43we generally start treatments
  • 01:17:44with metastatic cancer with a
  • 01:17:46combination of two medications and
  • 01:17:47often those combinations are one
  • 01:17:49of those pills we talked about.
  • 01:17:50The anti VHL type well.
  • 01:17:52The anti that shaft pathway ones
  • 01:17:54and one of the immune therapies.
  • 01:17:57So David are the combinations
  • 01:17:59different from each other or not?
  • 01:18:02It's a great question.
  • 01:18:03I think if you ask 10 different kidney
  • 01:18:05cancer experts across the country,
  • 01:18:07you're gonna get probably three
  • 01:18:09or four different answers.
  • 01:18:11But I'll say a couple things.
  • 01:18:12So I sort of lumped them
  • 01:18:14together into two big buckets.
  • 01:18:16Are you going to get 2
  • 01:18:17immunotherapy drugs together?
  • 01:18:18That's one option,
  • 01:18:19or are you going to get one immunotherapy
  • 01:18:21drug and one of those blood vessel
  • 01:18:23blocking drugs and anti angiogenic?
  • 01:18:25That's the other bucket.
  • 01:18:26Now if you're in this bucket
  • 01:18:28of A1 immunotherapy and a a
  • 01:18:31blood vessel blocking drug.
  • 01:18:33Are there differences between them?
  • 01:18:34There's actually 4
  • 01:18:35regimens that are approved.
  • 01:18:36The answer is is probably slight
  • 01:18:38differences between them,
  • 01:18:39but it's probably pretty slight.
  • 01:18:40I think the things that matter
  • 01:18:42probably more than anything else is.
  • 01:18:44If you're within that class of drugs,
  • 01:18:46the physicians comfort
  • 01:18:47level in prescribing them.
  • 01:18:48So people who prescribe
  • 01:18:49cabozantinib alot are going to
  • 01:18:51probably prescribe Cowboys anthem,
  • 01:18:53and that's probably a better
  • 01:18:54option than people who prescribe.
  • 01:18:55That's it novel Otter, another drug.
  • 01:18:57And so I think once you're in that class,
  • 01:18:58there might be subtle differences,
  • 01:19:00but they're by and large pretty
  • 01:19:02pretty similar, especially.
  • 01:19:03The latest generations there might be
  • 01:19:05differences in how toxic they are,
  • 01:19:07meaning how many side effects
  • 01:19:09they might cause,
  • 01:19:09and that might help the guide
  • 01:19:11which among those I think a big
  • 01:19:12question is how do you choose
  • 01:19:14between those two big branches.
  • 01:19:15I think that's a bigger question.
  • 01:19:16How do you choose between 2 immune
  • 01:19:18therapies and an immunotherapy?
  • 01:19:20And and I think again you can go
  • 01:19:22to many experts and there's no.
  • 01:19:24There's no trial comparing them head-to-head,
  • 01:19:26so no one,
  • 01:19:27no one can tell you that answer for sure,
  • 01:19:29but I'll give you sort of my my two cents.
  • 01:19:31I think the thing that's been
  • 01:19:32transformative about I mean therapy.
  • 01:19:34Is not only that they lead to
  • 01:19:35tumor shrinkage,
  • 01:19:36but really that for some patients
  • 01:19:37they lead to a long term survival.
  • 01:19:39Maybe even for that subset
  • 01:19:41of patients a cure.
  • 01:19:42And while we don't know this for sure,
  • 01:19:45I think there's there's some reason
  • 01:19:46to think that having those two
  • 01:19:48immune therapies together might
  • 01:19:50actually increase the chance of
  • 01:19:51having that longer term survival,
  • 01:19:53and so all other things being equal,
  • 01:19:55I tend to lean towards that.
  • 01:19:57But it's not for everyone.
  • 01:19:58And then the question is why one
  • 01:20:00is those those can in certain
  • 01:20:01ways be more toxic.
  • 01:20:02They have more immune related side effects.
  • 01:20:05That's a. That's a really important thing.
  • 01:20:07The second is.
  • 01:20:08While they might work better,
  • 01:20:10arguably that's arguably in the
  • 01:20:12long term in the short term,
  • 01:20:14they probably don't shrink
  • 01:20:15the tumor quite as well,
  • 01:20:16and so there are patients who
  • 01:20:18unfortunately have disease that
  • 01:20:20might be really rapidly grown,
  • 01:20:21or they might have a lot of
  • 01:20:22symptoms from their disease,
  • 01:20:23where the most important thing is really
  • 01:20:25shrinking it as soon as possible,
  • 01:20:27in which case having to immunotherapy's
  • 01:20:29might always be the best option.
  • 01:20:30So the overall answer is it tends to
  • 01:20:32be a patient, specific conversation.
  • 01:20:34At least that's my. My two cents,
  • 01:20:36but Michael curious with your thoughts are
  • 01:20:38I'm actually very relieved.
  • 01:20:39I don't have to say anything
  • 01:20:40'cause that's the exact answer
  • 01:20:41I would have liked to give.
  • 01:20:43I mean, almost you know word for word,
  • 01:20:45except except said better so
  • 01:20:46that that that's fantastic.
  • 01:20:48That makes me very happy,
  • 01:20:49but it's absolutely true that
  • 01:20:50you can talk to 10 different
  • 01:20:51kidney cancer docs and get 10
  • 01:20:53different similar similar answers,
  • 01:20:55usually alright.
  • 01:20:56The second question is when will
  • 01:20:59real information as to biomarkers
  • 01:21:01and patients and they're likely
  • 01:21:02response to immune therapies
  • 01:21:04or to targeted therapies.
  • 01:21:05Happen and what makes one patient
  • 01:21:07responder versus something
  • 01:21:08versus unlikely to respond?
  • 01:21:11Yeah, it's a. It's a great
  • 01:21:13question and one that I
  • 01:21:14wish we had the answer to today and
  • 01:21:15so the the real answer is we don't
  • 01:21:17have read biomarkers right now,
  • 01:21:19and I think we we absolutely
  • 01:21:20need to do better and think
  • 01:21:22about every possible domain.
  • 01:21:24Honestly, one of them may
  • 01:21:25be the better biomarkers.
  • 01:21:26That's out there is not any fancy
  • 01:21:28sequencing that I talked about is
  • 01:21:30actually looking under the microscope
  • 01:21:32we had talked about these sarcomatoid
  • 01:21:35and rhabdoid tumors before.
  • 01:21:37Those are ones which historically
  • 01:21:38unfortunately have not responded
  • 01:21:40nearly as well to the pills.
  • 01:21:41Does anti angiogenic get medicines,
  • 01:21:44but for some reason seem to have a much,
  • 01:21:46much better response to immunotherapy's
  • 01:21:48the number of actually patients
  • 01:21:49who have a complete response being
  • 01:21:51the tumor seems to just disappear,
  • 01:21:53is actually higher in those patients
  • 01:21:55with sarcomatoid features because
  • 01:21:56you only really find by looking
  • 01:21:58under the microscope compared to
  • 01:22:00other patients with kidney cancer,
  • 01:22:02and so sometimes the old traditional
  • 01:22:04tests are still the best ones,
  • 01:22:06but I wish I could say today we
  • 01:22:08have the absolute molecular test
  • 01:22:10that tells us about the drug works.
  • 01:22:12Or doesn't we're working on it,
  • 01:22:14but we don't have it yet.
  • 01:22:16OK, and two more questions.
  • 01:22:17One is are there metastasis into lung
  • 01:22:21and liver still for chromophobe? Like,
  • 01:22:24yeah, yeah, absolutely so.
  • 01:22:25It's this is, I think,
  • 01:22:27a common question terminology.
  • 01:22:28If someone has a kidney cancer
  • 01:22:30but then move somewhere else,
  • 01:22:31it's moved to the lungs.
  • 01:22:32Is it still kidney cancer?
  • 01:22:34And really it matters less where it is
  • 01:22:36and more where it came from in terms
  • 01:22:38of how we define the tumor and how,
  • 01:22:40how those tumors might
  • 01:22:41actually respond to therapy.
  • 01:22:43So if it's a chromophobe that then
  • 01:22:44moved to the lungs and they they did
  • 01:22:46a biopsy or surgery and really looked
  • 01:22:48it under the microscope and it looks
  • 01:22:50the same but the doctors are really
  • 01:22:51confident it came from the kidney.
  • 01:22:53That would still be the same cancer.
  • 01:22:55Yeah? And it's although it's
  • 01:22:57rare homophobes do metastasize.
  • 01:22:59You know, we we see it to to
  • 01:23:01answer that question and then
  • 01:23:03I think I'm sorry.
  • 01:23:04I think really important point about
  • 01:23:06Chromophobe's is that it's much more
  • 01:23:08common for patients who have metastatic
  • 01:23:10chromophobe kidney cancer to have had
  • 01:23:13metastases at the time of diagnosis.
  • 01:23:15It's much less common for
  • 01:23:18someone who's had on imaging.
  • 01:23:20It looks localized they've had surgery.
  • 01:23:22It's much less common for those patients.
  • 01:23:24To develop cancer spread and you know,
  • 01:23:28I think for a lot of our patients
  • 01:23:30who have had surgery for,
  • 01:23:33you know, a large or higher stage.
  • 01:23:36But localized chromophobe kidney cancer.
  • 01:23:38I think it's really important to know
  • 01:23:41that those patients often do very
  • 01:23:43do quite well and don't necessarily
  • 01:23:45have some of the same level of
  • 01:23:47risks as other more aggressive
  • 01:23:48types of kidney cancers like as
  • 01:23:51like a high grade sarcomatoid,
  • 01:23:53clear cell kidney cancer.
  • 01:23:54For instance,
  • 01:23:56it's really important point.
  • 01:23:59So the last question,
  • 01:24:00which I don't exactly understand,
  • 01:24:01but I'll say it word for word and
  • 01:24:03it's is as a stage four Survivor
  • 01:24:05now 18 years thanks to surgery
  • 01:24:08and high dose interleukin 2.
  • 01:24:10Why not review the value of that
  • 01:24:12treatment in light of our better
  • 01:24:13understanding of kidney cancer?
  • 01:24:16So my search sense I could be wrong is
  • 01:24:20that maybe why not go back to Hydrocele
  • 01:24:222 and surgery things that might have
  • 01:24:24worked in the in the past and I I
  • 01:24:26think it's a really good question.
  • 01:24:27If you know we we look back and high dose
  • 01:24:30is not something that's commonly used,
  • 01:24:32but there were actually patients who
  • 01:24:34had a really long term response.
  • 01:24:35Probably cure.
  • 01:24:36It was probably on the order of
  • 01:24:38around 5 to 7%, so not frequent,
  • 01:24:40and it's something that can be really toxic,
  • 01:24:42so it's typically administered
  • 01:24:43and it really monitored setting
  • 01:24:45'cause people can get very sick.
  • 01:24:46So the question is, why don't we do it more?
  • 01:24:48More commonly I think the short answer is 1.
  • 01:24:51We have tools that we think
  • 01:24:52are maybe slightly better.
  • 01:24:53These immune checkpoint drugs and two
  • 01:24:55was actually being studied are similar
  • 01:24:57medicines to high dose IL 2 but that
  • 01:24:59have been modified to try to make them
  • 01:25:01a little bit less toxic and maybe a
  • 01:25:03little more efficacious and so those
  • 01:25:05drugs are actually these modified.
  • 01:25:07I'll twos are actually in
  • 01:25:08clinical trials now.
  • 01:25:10Yeah, so I would. I would.
  • 01:25:11I would add that a little bit which
  • 01:25:12is that it is happening is the point.
  • 01:25:14There are a bunch of drugs out there
  • 01:25:16that are thought to be better ILD who's
  • 01:25:18but but use the I O2 biology that are
  • 01:25:21being studied currently and they're
  • 01:25:22going to be doing it in combination
  • 01:25:24with the other types of therapy.
  • 01:25:25So it's all happening and
  • 01:25:27hopefully it'll it'll.
  • 01:25:28It'll be great.
  • 01:25:29Alright, let's move on to Eric Healey.
  • 01:25:32One more geneticists and one comments.
  • 01:25:36What was that? Oh
  • 01:25:38no, sorry there was just one
  • 01:25:39more question in the Q&A and
  • 01:25:40it just said asked about that.
  • 01:25:42How severe are the side effects of
  • 01:25:44the oral medications for kidney
  • 01:25:45cancer compared to what we think
  • 01:25:47of as traditional chemotherapy,
  • 01:25:49nausea, hair loss, things like that.
  • 01:25:52So so in brief, they're quite different,
  • 01:25:55so and and and and it it depends so so.
  • 01:26:01I think the the they're not as bad.
  • 01:26:03Acutely I would say,
  • 01:26:04although other people could disagree with me,
  • 01:26:06but the problem is that you
  • 01:26:07take him for a long time.
  • 01:26:08You take him every day and they can
  • 01:26:09be incredibly wearing and some people
  • 01:26:11just do have very bad side effects,
  • 01:26:12but the side effect profile is
  • 01:26:14quite different. I would say the
  • 01:26:16number one thing is GI issues.
  • 01:26:18A lot of diarrhea for some people,
  • 01:26:20maybe a lot of rash for some
  • 01:26:22people that can be quite difficult.
  • 01:26:25Appetite can go down, there can be nausea.
  • 01:26:27You know a lot of fatigue can happen.
  • 01:26:31And so.
  • 01:26:32It it's it's almost it's very
  • 01:26:34hard to compare because.
  • 01:26:36It's a chronic thing,
  • 01:26:38usually versus chemo,
  • 01:26:40which is sort of happens and then
  • 01:26:41gets better happens and gets better.
  • 01:26:45I don't there's probably a better
  • 01:26:46answer out there. I don't know David.
  • 01:26:48You have a better way to put
  • 01:26:50no, I think that's sort of short,
  • 01:26:52but more severe versus longer,
  • 01:26:55but kind of wearing is is probably
  • 01:26:56a really good thing and everyone
  • 01:26:58everyone sort of is different in terms
  • 01:27:00of the side effects they experience
  • 01:27:02I I think probably on average people
  • 01:27:04think of these as being, you know,
  • 01:27:06they feel less bad than than the
  • 01:27:08conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • 01:27:09that would make people lose their
  • 01:27:11hair and make people nauseous.
  • 01:27:12But you can imagine it's one thing to.
  • 01:27:14Have that dose of chemotherapy and
  • 01:27:16feel really sick for a couple of weeks
  • 01:27:18versus something that you know maybe
  • 01:27:20makes you feel a little bit tired but
  • 01:27:22kinda wears on day after day, after day,
  • 01:27:24that after months or years of it.
  • 01:27:25It might sort of build up that
  • 01:27:27I think that's the difference,
  • 01:27:28and so it's you're absolutely.
  • 01:27:29I think it's hard to compare.
  • 01:27:32Let's move on.
  • 01:27:33So yes, someone said that hand
  • 01:27:35Foot syndrome is not really.
  • 01:27:36It absolutely is so.
  • 01:27:38So there is a question,
  • 01:27:40but you're going to hopefully
  • 01:27:41answer it 'cause it's one of
  • 01:27:42the genetic predispositions
  • 01:27:43for RCC and other things so.
  • 01:27:46Started so my name is Claire Healy.
  • 01:27:49I'm one of the genetic counselors
  • 01:27:51in the smilow cancer genetics
  • 01:27:53and prevention program.
  • 01:27:55Can everyone see my slides?
  • 01:27:58Alright, perfect, so I'm going to do
  • 01:28:00just a brief overview of hereditary
  • 01:28:03kidney tumor and cancer syndromes.
  • 01:28:05It would be impossible to do a deep
  • 01:28:07dive in a short period of time,
  • 01:28:09but I'll do my best to give
  • 01:28:11kind of a brief overview,
  • 01:28:13so we'll start just by kind
  • 01:28:16of pointing out that while.
  • 01:28:18We're gonna talk about hereditary
  • 01:28:20kidney cancer syndromes.
  • 01:28:21Hereditary hereditary kidney cancer and
  • 01:28:23tumor syndromes are actually fairly rare,
  • 01:28:26and most cancer is not hereditary or genetic.
  • 01:28:30So most cancer 70% of cancer
  • 01:28:33is actually sporadic,
  • 01:28:35and that just means that it's caused by
  • 01:28:37things like the normal aging process,
  • 01:28:40overtime, lifestyle factors,
  • 01:28:43environmental exposures,
  • 01:28:44and in most cases when we look
  • 01:28:47at a patient's personal history,
  • 01:28:49family history,
  • 01:28:50when the cancer sporadic will
  • 01:28:51expect to see those cancers
  • 01:28:53occurring kind of at at later ages.
  • 01:28:55General population ages.
  • 01:28:56When we look at the family history,
  • 01:28:59we'll expect to see.
  • 01:29:01A random mix of cancer types in the family.
  • 01:29:04Another 20% of cancer is explained
  • 01:29:08by a familial predisposition,
  • 01:29:10so these are families where we might
  • 01:29:13see multiple people in the family who
  • 01:29:16are developing the same type of cancer,
  • 01:29:19and so we might see.
  • 01:29:22And a higher than average risk
  • 01:29:24for a certain type of cancer.
  • 01:29:27But we would still expect to see
  • 01:29:29most of those cancers developing
  • 01:29:32average population ages.
  • 01:29:34In most cases we wouldn't see
  • 01:29:36rare or unusual types of cancers,
  • 01:29:38and these are really clusters of
  • 01:29:41cancers that are likely explained by
  • 01:29:43some shared genetic risk factors.
  • 01:29:46But alongside a shared combination
  • 01:29:49of lifestyle and environmental
  • 01:29:51exposures as well.
  • 01:29:53And then really only 5 to 10%
  • 01:29:55of her cancer is explained by
  • 01:29:59a Hereditary Cancer syndrome.
  • 01:30:01And so these are situations where
  • 01:30:04there is a greater lifetime risk of
  • 01:30:07cancer that cancers are typically
  • 01:30:10diagnosed at younger than expected ages.
  • 01:30:13There's a greater chance of
  • 01:30:15developing a second cancer,
  • 01:30:17and we usually see more rare
  • 01:30:19types of cancers as well.
  • 01:30:21And in these families,
  • 01:30:22we may see the same type of cancer or
  • 01:30:26related types of cancers clustering together.
  • 01:30:29So in terms of what we look for,
  • 01:30:31what you should look for,
  • 01:30:33what your doctors are looking for,
  • 01:30:34and what your genetic counselors are
  • 01:30:36looking for to kind of give clues
  • 01:30:39as to whether there's a hereditary
  • 01:30:41predisposition for cancer in the family.
  • 01:30:43Are things like cancers that are
  • 01:30:45diagnosed at earlier than expected ages?
  • 01:30:48So for kidney cancer we usually
  • 01:30:50say that's under the age of 4746.
  • 01:30:53Forty seven.
  • 01:30:53I know that sounds like sort of a
  • 01:30:57very arbitrary and specific number,
  • 01:30:59but there is research out there that
  • 01:31:02says really anything under 4647
  • 01:31:04is where the risk for Hereditary
  • 01:31:07syndrome really starts to increase.
  • 01:31:09We would also expect to see multiple
  • 01:31:11family members on the same side
  • 01:31:13of the family with this same type
  • 01:31:16of cancer or related type of cancer
  • 01:31:18or tumors, so this might be a mother
  • 01:31:20and a child who have both had the same
  • 01:31:23type of kidney cancer or two siblings
  • 01:31:26with the same type of kidney cancer.
  • 01:31:29And then we can see rare cancers or
  • 01:31:33rare tumors such as angiomyolipomas
  • 01:31:35or chromophobe tumors that have
  • 01:31:38already been mentioned tonight.
  • 01:31:40And we might also see a person who's
  • 01:31:43developing multiple cancers or tumors.
  • 01:31:45Sometimes this is multiple
  • 01:31:46tumors in the kidney,
  • 01:31:47but other times it's multiple
  • 01:31:49different types of cancers or tumors.
  • 01:31:52And rare benign tumors.
  • 01:31:53So in a lot of our hereditary
  • 01:31:56kidney cancer syndromes,
  • 01:31:58these are going to be rare benign tumors
  • 01:32:00that are developing in the kidney,
  • 01:32:02but also rare benign tumors that
  • 01:32:05are developing on this skin.
  • 01:32:07Sometimes those are lesions on the
  • 01:32:09skin that might be very subtle and that
  • 01:32:12you might not even notice yourself,
  • 01:32:15but that a dermatologist might
  • 01:32:17be able to see.
  • 01:32:18Other times,
  • 01:32:19those might be things on your skin that are,
  • 01:32:21you know, sort of just skin colored.
  • 01:32:23But maybe you notice that they're really
  • 01:32:25sensitive to the cold or when you touch them.
  • 01:32:28They're a little bit painful.
  • 01:32:30Sometimes these rare tumors are things
  • 01:32:32that develop in the brain or in the lungs,
  • 01:32:34and so they're not things that
  • 01:32:36you would encounter,
  • 01:32:37kind of in the the general
  • 01:32:40population very often.
  • 01:32:42And when we talk about
  • 01:32:44hereditary syndromes really,
  • 01:32:46what we're talking about and what
  • 01:32:47what's already been mentioned tonight,
  • 01:32:49are these genes that normally are
  • 01:32:51kind of helping to prevent cancer,
  • 01:32:53so they're keeping the cells in our body,
  • 01:32:56kind of growing and dividing
  • 01:32:58into really regimented way.
  • 01:32:59And so,
  • 01:33:00like what's been mentioned previously,
  • 01:33:03most of the time people are born with two
  • 01:33:06healthy working copies of those genes,
  • 01:33:08and when that's the case,
  • 01:33:10the way they develop a tumor.
  • 01:33:12Or a cancer?
  • 01:33:13Is that both copies have to become damaged,
  • 01:33:17or what we call mutated overtime to
  • 01:33:20allow the cell to start growing,
  • 01:33:23dividing out of control,
  • 01:33:24forming that tumor,
  • 01:33:25and eventually the cancer.
  • 01:33:27In individuals who have an inherited
  • 01:33:30cancer predisposition syndrome,
  • 01:33:33what happens is they actually
  • 01:33:35start their life one step into
  • 01:33:37that process so they are born with
  • 01:33:41one healthy working copy of these
  • 01:33:44genes and then the other copy,
  • 01:33:46and every cell of their body
  • 01:33:48contains a mutation and so they're
  • 01:33:51sort of down one line of defense
  • 01:33:53when we think about cancer,
  • 01:33:55because now it's going to take just one.
  • 01:33:58Random event to occur before the
  • 01:34:00tumor or the cancer can develop,
  • 01:34:03and that's why we would expect to see
  • 01:34:05younger ages at the time of diagnosis.
  • 01:34:07A higher cancer risk overall,
  • 01:34:10and why we can see multiple tumors and
  • 01:34:14multiple different areas of the body.
  • 01:34:17So this is a very busy slide,
  • 01:34:19and I apologize that it's so cluttered.
  • 01:34:22But when we think about our hereditary
  • 01:34:25kidney tumor or cancer syndromes,
  • 01:34:27these are the most common ones.
  • 01:34:29There are some other ones,
  • 01:34:30but these are the the ones
  • 01:34:32we think about the most.
  • 01:34:34And you can see that when your
  • 01:34:36doctors are meeting with you,
  • 01:34:37or if you meet with a genetic
  • 01:34:40counselor really what we're thinking
  • 01:34:41about first are what type of kidney,
  • 01:34:44tumor or cancer do you have that helps
  • 01:34:48us kind of narrow down what syndrome
  • 01:34:50might might we be thinking about?
  • 01:34:52So we've already talked about VHL tonight,
  • 01:34:55which is associated with the
  • 01:34:57clear cell type of kidney cancer,
  • 01:35:00but we also have hereditary syndromes
  • 01:35:02that are associated with other types.
  • 01:35:04I have kidney cancers like papillary
  • 01:35:07kidney cancer, chromophobe tumors,
  • 01:35:09the angiomyolipomas that were
  • 01:35:12mentioned earlier tonight.
  • 01:35:14And then so that helps us
  • 01:35:15kind of narrow down.
  • 01:35:16OK, What syndrome are we thinking
  • 01:35:19about in that individual or the family?
  • 01:35:21And then we think about?
  • 01:35:22Are there any of those other
  • 01:35:24features that we would expect to see
  • 01:35:26in that individual or the family?
  • 01:35:28Like some of those non cancerous or the
  • 01:35:32benign tumors in other areas of the body?
  • 01:35:34So when you meet with a genetic counselor,
  • 01:35:37we spend a lot of time talking about your
  • 01:35:40medical history and your family history.
  • 01:35:42We ask you what feels probably like
  • 01:35:44a laundry list of questions about.
  • 01:35:46Different aspects of your medical
  • 01:35:48care and your family members.
  • 01:35:50Medical history.
  • 01:35:50But really,
  • 01:35:51the reason we're asking those detailed
  • 01:35:53questions is 'cause we're trying
  • 01:35:55to narrow down as much as possible.
  • 01:35:57What hereditary syndrome?
  • 01:35:59What might we be thinking of?
  • 01:36:03And then just in terms of basics
  • 01:36:05of genetic testing,
  • 01:36:06if you are thinking about genetic testing
  • 01:36:08and you do meet with a genetic counselor,
  • 01:36:11a genetic counselor will kind of
  • 01:36:13go over different test options
  • 01:36:14with you insurance coverage.
  • 01:36:16Answer all of those questions.
  • 01:36:18But just to give you a little
  • 01:36:20bit of background,
  • 01:36:20genetic testing can be completed
  • 01:36:22from blood or from saliva.
  • 01:36:25It is covered by most insurance companies,
  • 01:36:28especially if you have a personal or
  • 01:36:31a family history that's suggestive
  • 01:36:33of a hereditary.
  • 01:36:34Cancer syndrome, so again,
  • 01:36:35if you're young when you're diagnosed,
  • 01:36:38if you have a family history of a
  • 01:36:40first or second or relative who was
  • 01:36:42young when they were diagnosed with cancer?
  • 01:36:44If you have some of those benign rare tumors,
  • 01:36:47all of those things are going to suggest
  • 01:36:49that there is a hereditary risk,
  • 01:36:51and in most cases you will have
  • 01:36:54coverage for genetic testing.
  • 01:36:56Luckily,
  • 01:36:56the price of genetic testing has come down,
  • 01:36:59so if in the unlikely event you do
  • 01:37:01not have coverage for genetic testing,
  • 01:37:04most of the time we can complete
  • 01:37:06that genetic testing for an out
  • 01:37:09of pocket cost of around $250 and
  • 01:37:11a lot of the genetic testing
  • 01:37:13laboratories that we use do offer
  • 01:37:15patient financial assistance as well.
  • 01:37:17And there are federal laws that prohibit
  • 01:37:20genetic discrimination by health
  • 01:37:22insurance companies and employers,
  • 01:37:24with some rare exceptions,
  • 01:37:27particularly for our active
  • 01:37:29duty service members.
  • 01:37:31And that was my last slide.
  • 01:37:37I was on mute. That's fantastic.
  • 01:37:38Excellent. It was great.
  • 01:37:39So in in there there are questions
  • 01:37:42that are absolutely up your alley.
  • 01:37:44So the first question is what are the
  • 01:37:47the genetic predispositions for RCC?
  • 01:37:49And now you know the
  • 01:37:50answers to the others too.
  • 01:37:51And skin or bladder cancer.
  • 01:37:53So there's not necessarily one syndrome
  • 01:37:56that connects all three of those together.
  • 01:38:00But there are a number of
  • 01:38:02hereditary kidney cancer syndromes.
  • 01:38:03Some of those increase the
  • 01:38:05risk for Melanoma as well.
  • 01:38:06So if we're talking about a skin cancer,
  • 01:38:08that's Melanoma.
  • 01:38:09That could be a concern.
  • 01:38:12There is a hereditary cancer
  • 01:38:14syndrome that does increase
  • 01:38:15the risk for bladder cancer and
  • 01:38:18collecting duct tumors of the kidney.
  • 01:38:20So if you have a family history or
  • 01:38:22personal history of all of those cancers,
  • 01:38:24good idea to ask for or for
  • 01:38:26all to a genetic counselor.
  • 01:38:28Great and second question was
  • 01:38:31my dad had a tumor, no, no.
  • 01:38:34There's another one. Sorry.
  • 01:38:35My brother and I were both diagnosed
  • 01:38:37with clear cell kidney kidney cancer.
  • 01:38:39We both completed genetic
  • 01:38:41testing with no concerns.
  • 01:38:42How concerned should we be
  • 01:38:44for our children inheriting
  • 01:38:45clear cell kidney cancer?
  • 01:38:47So one thing that I would say
  • 01:38:49is just like most medicine,
  • 01:38:51genetic testing gets better with time.
  • 01:38:53So if your genetic testing
  • 01:38:55was performed a while ago,
  • 01:38:56we likely have newer genetic testing
  • 01:38:59technology that can evaluate the
  • 01:39:01same genes but pick up mutations that
  • 01:39:04may have been missed previously.
  • 01:39:06So if your genetic testing
  • 01:39:08was completed a while ago,
  • 01:39:09good idea to contact whoever
  • 01:39:11performed that genetic testing or
  • 01:39:13ask your doctor for a referral to
  • 01:39:15a genetic counselor to see if.
  • 01:39:17Updated testing with the appropriate.
  • 01:39:20In families where there are multiple
  • 01:39:23relatives with a tumor type where we do
  • 01:39:27not identify a genetic predisposition,
  • 01:39:30it doesn't mean that one doesn't exist.
  • 01:39:32We don't know of all genes that are
  • 01:39:35associated with these hereditary cancer
  • 01:39:37syndromes and also there's still that
  • 01:39:39risk of a familial predisposition,
  • 01:39:41so not one single genetic factor
  • 01:39:43but a combination of factors.
  • 01:39:45So in that case,
  • 01:39:47with two relatives closely related to
  • 01:39:49one another with the same tumor type.
  • 01:39:52I would still estimate that their risk
  • 01:39:54for other family members to develop
  • 01:39:56that same tumor type would be higher
  • 01:39:58than in the general population.
  • 01:40:01And that that's a great answer,
  • 01:40:03I let me let me add one or two things and and
  • 01:40:05other people can correct me if I'm wrong.
  • 01:40:07You know, sometimes it helps to know a
  • 01:40:09little bit more about the situation so.
  • 01:40:12You know, are the tumors bigger? They small.
  • 01:40:15How old were you when you got that?
  • 01:40:17If if if you're both 80 years old,
  • 01:40:20still it's it's.
  • 01:40:21It's not super common that you both
  • 01:40:22have that, but it may not be so
  • 01:40:24uncommon if you're both 55 years old.
  • 01:40:26That's different so but but but
  • 01:40:29I think that point you made is so
  • 01:40:31important that just because we don't.
  • 01:40:33Have a name for.
  • 01:40:34It doesn't mean there isn't a genetic
  • 01:40:35thing out there that we don't know of yet.
  • 01:40:37Is that yeah, and
  • 01:40:39doctor Kenny is reminding me that
  • 01:40:41I said a while ago but didn't
  • 01:40:43really define what that was,
  • 01:40:45so anything more than five years ago,
  • 01:40:48we always recommend our patients
  • 01:40:49contact us every five years to see
  • 01:40:52if there's any new genetic testing
  • 01:40:54technology that they would be worthwhile
  • 01:40:56updating their genetic test with.
  • 01:40:59And and so this person actually
  • 01:41:00answered and said they're in their 50s.
  • 01:41:02And and my answer to that is,
  • 01:41:05go see Claire because you know what
  • 01:41:08you're going to do and maybe you would
  • 01:41:10say this already is that you do a
  • 01:41:12whole history about what's going on
  • 01:41:13with the family and all those things.
  • 01:41:15You get a lot more information
  • 01:41:17by that, right?
  • 01:41:18Yeah, absolutely.
  • 01:41:18And even if there's not
  • 01:41:21updated genetic testing,
  • 01:41:22we can talk about risks to relatives,
  • 01:41:25what those risks may be,
  • 01:41:27and can also help make connections for.
  • 01:41:29Unaffected people in the family
  • 01:41:30with high risk providers who
  • 01:41:32may be able to offer screening.
  • 01:41:35OK, and the last
  • 01:41:36another really important thing to think
  • 01:41:38about too is shared exposures and and
  • 01:41:41so sometimes if a patient has a kidney
  • 01:41:43cancer and a bladder cancer, it may not
  • 01:41:46be a genetic predisposition to that.
  • 01:41:49But perhaps they had an exposure that may
  • 01:41:51have increased the risk of of both and.
  • 01:41:53And so I I do think we we see that a lot.
  • 01:41:57I think we also see it's fairly
  • 01:41:59common to diagnose the second cancer
  • 01:42:01in a patient who has had a cancer,
  • 01:42:03and because we're doing imaging.
  • 01:42:05And and we might find something
  • 01:42:07that wasn't causing any symptoms.
  • 01:42:10You know we're doing a chest scan
  • 01:42:11because someone has a bladder cancer.
  • 01:42:13It shows a thyroid nodule,
  • 01:42:14which leads to an ultrasound
  • 01:42:15which leads to a biopsy,
  • 01:42:17which leads to a diagnosis
  • 01:42:18of papillary thyroid cancer.
  • 01:42:19And that's that's a very very
  • 01:42:21common course of events,
  • 01:42:23and so sometimes these clusters of a
  • 01:42:26couple cancers may just be by chance,
  • 01:42:29or could be from an exposure or
  • 01:42:33or or genetics, but.
  • 01:42:36Hugely important point.
  • 01:42:37Yeah, that we're sort of more biased
  • 01:42:40once we hear it from one thing.
  • 01:42:41Let me go to the last question that I stay.
  • 01:42:45Actually two more, but one is my dad
  • 01:42:47had a tumor in his bladder and had
  • 01:42:49a urostomy can that be hereditary?
  • 01:42:51But instead of the cancer being in
  • 01:42:53my bladder, it was in my left kidney.
  • 01:42:56So in other words,
  • 01:42:57yeah, you got that
  • 01:42:58yeah, great question.
  • 01:43:01So is it possible? Yes, absolutely.
  • 01:43:03It's possible that there could
  • 01:43:05be a genetic syndrome that links
  • 01:43:08those two cancers together.
  • 01:43:10But it's also possible that they're
  • 01:43:12completely unrelated to each other,
  • 01:43:14and both just occurred by chance.
  • 01:43:17So again, I'd I'd have to have more
  • 01:43:19information about ages at the time of
  • 01:43:22diagnosis and other family history,
  • 01:43:23which is why a genetics visit is probably.
  • 01:43:26The best step if you have those questions.
  • 01:43:28Yeah, as Doctor Kennedy pointed out,
  • 01:43:30there are cancers that are in the kidney
  • 01:43:31that are really more like bladder cancers,
  • 01:43:33but they're really different from
  • 01:43:34what we consider kidney cancers.
  • 01:43:36If you have a what we consider a kidney
  • 01:43:37cancer and your father had a bladder cancer,
  • 01:43:40probably not related.
  • 01:43:40I think it's a fair statement,
  • 01:43:42but and then the last thing was can we
  • 01:43:46go through your place to do a test?
  • 01:43:48Yes, absolutely. So the smilow cancer
  • 01:43:51genetics and prevention program.
  • 01:43:53Our main hub is in New Haven,
  • 01:43:56but we also see patients throughout
  • 01:43:58the state of Connecticut at
  • 01:43:59various other hospitals,
  • 01:44:00so we're in Trumbull.
  • 01:44:02We see patients in Waterford we're in
  • 01:44:05Greenwich and we also have an outreach
  • 01:44:07arm up at Saint Francis Hospital in Hartford,
  • 01:44:10so you can if you if you need a a
  • 01:44:14contact information you can actually
  • 01:44:17email smilow cancer genetics.
  • 01:44:20Why nhh.org let us know where you live
  • 01:44:24and we can help find the best clinic
  • 01:44:26for you and we can tell you how to
  • 01:44:29get your doctor to refer you over.
  • 01:44:31It was actually put into
  • 01:44:33the chat that number.
  • 01:44:34Some people aren't great with the web.
  • 01:44:36Is there a phone number
  • 01:44:38and it looks like Renee actually
  • 01:44:40put the website there too,
  • 01:44:42but the phone number is 2032
  • 01:44:45hundred for DNA. Perfect.
  • 01:44:51That's that's very very fitting.
  • 01:44:53Alright, I think I think we're done.
  • 01:45:00Anyone have anything else to add?
  • 01:45:03Well, this has been exceptionally
  • 01:45:05informative to me, so I hope it's been
  • 01:45:07informative to everybody else here.
  • 01:45:09It's great and. By everyone if
  • 01:45:13you have questions you can always.
  • 01:45:14I'm sure there are ways to reach out
  • 01:45:16to any of us and have a great evening.
  • 01:45:20Thank you, I learned a lot too, so thank you.
  • 01:45:23This was wonderful.