Skip to Main Content

Moving from Palliation to Cure: Progress in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

October 10, 2023
  • 00:00Real pleasure to introduce Roy Herbst.
  • 00:03Roy of course needs no
  • 00:05introduction to all of you.
  • 00:08You can see his title on the screen Moving
  • 00:10from Palliation to Cure Progress in the
  • 00:13treatment of non small cell lung cancer.
  • 00:15But let me just make a couple of comments.
  • 00:18So Roy has really witnessed over the
  • 00:23course of his 25 year career or so since
  • 00:29completing training of has has witnessed
  • 00:31a real revolution in lung cancer.
  • 00:34And I remember when I was a fellow
  • 00:38and nobody was interested in lung
  • 00:40cancer and there seemed to be little
  • 00:42hope for progress in lung cancer.
  • 00:44And that has really changed so very
  • 00:48dramatically And as Roy has witnessed
  • 00:51that he's also participated in it
  • 00:54and he has been involved in the vast
  • 00:58majority of clinical trials that have
  • 01:01led to major changes in lung cancer,
  • 01:03whether that's related to EGFR,
  • 01:07associated lung cancer or for
  • 01:09that matter trials focused on
  • 01:11immunotherapy and other treatments.
  • 01:13So great pleasure to introduce Roy.
  • 01:16He will take us through this talk
  • 01:18and is a great inaugural speaker.
  • 01:22Thank you, Eric.
  • 01:23And it's great to be back here in person in
  • 01:26the auditorium and happy Friday everyone.
  • 01:29And what I'm going to do in the
  • 01:32next 45 to 50 minutes is give you a
  • 01:34little bit of a tour of lung cancer.
  • 01:37So actually my journey began here
  • 01:39at Yale 44 years ago and my Pecam
  • 01:42professor's in the front row,
  • 01:43Don Engleman and and it's amazing
  • 01:45to see you and you know,
  • 01:47and I I actually wasn't his
  • 01:48course like he would probably
  • 01:52but it's you know,
  • 01:53Yale's just a phenomenal place.
  • 01:54So it's just so amazing for
  • 01:55me to be to be here and I gave
  • 01:57a grand rounds about 12 years
  • 01:59ago when I first arrived.
  • 02:00So a little bit of progress
  • 02:02since then and I'll show you
  • 02:04that now my disclosures.
  • 02:08So we're back. This was last week at
  • 02:14East Haven. We had our ASCO review and
  • 02:16and a dinner for some of the faculty.
  • 02:19It was just great to see so many
  • 02:21people there and the spirits there.
  • 02:23We had a great day discussing
  • 02:24all of our different divisions,
  • 02:26both solid and liquid advances in the
  • 02:30field and it's good to see so many
  • 02:32of those being done here at Yale.
  • 02:34And then of course we we had many of
  • 02:37our fellows and actually we're we're
  • 02:39really multidisciplinary of course
  • 02:40we have our hospitals team was there,
  • 02:43many of our fellows were there,
  • 02:44we had surgeons there,
  • 02:45we'd love to have our surgeons there,
  • 02:48radiation oncology.
  • 02:48One thing that I want to get across
  • 02:50today is the way we're making progress
  • 02:52in lung cancer and many diseases.
  • 02:54This is in a in a multi modality
  • 02:57fashion and you know the the
  • 02:58burden of lung cancer is is great.
  • 03:00I think most of this group is aware of that,
  • 03:02but it's the leading cause
  • 03:04of cancer death worldwide.
  • 03:05You know, more, more cases,
  • 03:07probably a skin cancer diagnosed of course,
  • 03:09but for you know, more,
  • 03:11more, you know,
  • 03:11it's more breast cancer in women
  • 03:13and prostate cancer in men.
  • 03:15But lung cancer is the number one
  • 03:17killer with over 2 million deaths
  • 03:19a year in the world with over
  • 03:21200,000 deaths in the United case,
  • 03:23200,000 new cases in the US
  • 03:25with over 130,000 deaths.
  • 03:26So this is the reason there's so
  • 03:28much research and pharmaceutical
  • 03:30development in this area.
  • 03:3184% of lung cancer is non
  • 03:33small cell lung cancer.
  • 03:34A a great effort now still with small
  • 03:36cell lung cancer used to be that
  • 03:38was only associated with smokers.
  • 03:39It's still mostly with smokers.
  • 03:41But now we know that EGFR mutated lung
  • 03:43cancer can develop into small cell
  • 03:44lung cancer and Sheng lives in the
  • 03:462nd row sort of leads to that effort
  • 03:47here and she'll probably give a grand round.
  • 03:50Oh yeah,
  • 03:51please.
  • 03:51It is a little distracting
  • 04:00thank you
  • 04:05and and we'll hear from Ann hopefully
  • 04:07in in this series later this year Well
  • 04:09when I started out you know as after
  • 04:11I I left Yale and I spent some time in
  • 04:13New York at Cornell and Rockefeller.
  • 04:15I went up to Boston and I I was working
  • 04:19at Dana Farber and I I I said this last
  • 04:22week at the to some of the fellows.
  • 04:24I got the job in lung cancer
  • 04:26because that's all it was.
  • 04:27You know the breast cancer
  • 04:28jobs were all filled.
  • 04:29The leukemia and lymphoma jobs actually liked
  • 04:31lung cancer and was very interested in it.
  • 04:33I had a wonderful mentor,
  • 04:35Emil Fry, also a Yale graduate,
  • 04:38But it was pretty dismal and it's very hard,
  • 04:41you know, you know,
  • 04:42as oncologists to work in the clinic
  • 04:43when you don't have tools to offer.
  • 04:45We had tools of chemotherapy,
  • 04:47but this is what survival curves look
  • 04:49like about 25 years ago for lung cancer.
  • 04:51And you can see there's really none at at,
  • 04:53you know, at at two years.
  • 04:55There's very little survival at three years,
  • 04:57almost nothing.
  • 04:58And progression was quite steep and
  • 05:00there was all this excitement about Dosi,
  • 05:02Taxol, Packley, Taxol, Amcitabine,
  • 05:06Carboplatinum.
  • 05:07These drugs made a difference
  • 05:08and they did improve survival,
  • 05:10but to a very small extent.
  • 05:12A median survival is of 7 to 8 months.
  • 05:14So the question was a paradigm
  • 05:16shift was needed.
  • 05:17And you know, you're you're
  • 05:18really a product of your mentors.
  • 05:20And I was very fortunate at at Dana Farber,
  • 05:22Tom Fry.
  • 05:23In the later years of his career,
  • 05:25I became his mentee and we we met,
  • 05:27you know,
  • 05:27at least two or three times a week.
  • 05:28And he always said take your best
  • 05:31drugs and use them early use them you
  • 05:33know in the multi modality setting
  • 05:35with surgery with radiation and we
  • 05:37already had seen that in lung cancer
  • 05:39back in those days because chemo
  • 05:40radiation it was a study done by
  • 05:42Doctor Dillman back in the the late 80s,
  • 05:45early 90s had shown that there was a
  • 05:47benefit for chemo radiation in this
  • 05:49disease and it did improve survival.
  • 05:52So what causes lung cancer?
  • 05:54I could give a whole talk on this
  • 05:55and and tobacco cessation efforts
  • 05:57that we're we're doing here and
  • 05:59with the ACR and you know we have a
  • 06:01a large tobacco grant here at Yale
  • 06:02and that that's very important for
  • 06:04our community cause New Haven is a
  • 06:05community where smoking is higher than
  • 06:07than in the rest of the United States.
  • 06:09But as I said many of the lung
  • 06:11cancers are non-smoking related now
  • 06:12and you can see actual mutations
  • 06:14and that's the excitement.
  • 06:15This is why so many people want to work
  • 06:17in this field because 20 years ago
  • 06:19each GFR mutations were identified.
  • 06:21So we actually know driver mutations
  • 06:22so we can target those.
  • 06:24But there are now at least ten other
  • 06:28targetable alterations and we're
  • 06:30seeing evidence of of benefit,
  • 06:33you know,
  • 06:34with a broad perspective.
  • 06:34I can see it.
  • 06:35Of course, to any given patient,
  • 06:37it's still not nearly enough.
  • 06:38And I'm sure almost everyone here has
  • 06:40some experience either as a physician,
  • 06:42as a, as a family member, as a friend,
  • 06:44with someone who's had lung cancer.
  • 06:45And while we can see that in men
  • 06:48survival death rates are coming down
  • 06:49and in women with a little bit of
  • 06:51a of a lag smoking in women began
  • 06:54later but still if you look in men
  • 06:56the incidence is coming down a lot of
  • 06:58that's screening and smoking cessation
  • 07:00but the mortality is coming down even more.
  • 07:02And in in women the same 1.2 and 3.1.
  • 07:05So we are making a difference in these data.
  • 07:07You know the data you get from the American
  • 07:08Cancer Society is always two or three,
  • 07:10four years old.
  • 07:11So I think this,
  • 07:12this shows some of the targeted therapies
  • 07:14which I'll talk about in the first
  • 07:15half of the talk and the immunotherapy
  • 07:17benefits are are still on the horizon.
  • 07:19Well, we've built an outstanding program.
  • 07:23We've had retreats over the years.
  • 07:24This is a retreat about 5-6 years ago.
  • 07:26And I guess want to point out
  • 07:27two things about this picture.
  • 07:29One actually three things.
  • 07:30One, this is a great group
  • 07:33multidisciplinary working as a team.
  • 07:35There's myself that's Dan Baffa,
  • 07:37this is David Swenson.
  • 07:38We we held this at the Business
  • 07:39School and and David came in and
  • 07:41inspired us with some of his you know
  • 07:43you know go after the problem hard.
  • 07:45He gave a very amazing speech.
  • 07:48Of course David passed away or
  • 07:49in the last few years,
  • 07:50but then I also want to point
  • 07:51out that's Roy Decker.
  • 07:52We had one of the best
  • 07:55radiation oncologists ever,
  • 07:56both as a clinician,
  • 07:58as a person in with patients and
  • 08:01he passed away recently as well.
  • 08:02So we lost a great member of our team.
  • 08:04But I just wanted to just say
  • 08:07we miss you dearly Roy.
  • 08:09And then you know we've continued to to meet,
  • 08:11this is a few years later
  • 08:13and you can see it's a team.
  • 08:15The only way we're going to
  • 08:16make progress is as a team,
  • 08:17as a multi modality team and this
  • 08:19is more of a clinical meeting.
  • 08:20I'll show you a translational
  • 08:22meeting at the end.
  • 08:23But you can see you know it's a it's a
  • 08:25team approach to lung cancer and you can
  • 08:27see there's Dan Lynn Tenui from pulmonary,
  • 08:29Frank Getterbach,
  • 08:30Sarah Goldberg who unfortunately
  • 08:31can't be here today,
  • 08:32but she sent me a nice note and this,
  • 08:35this was over at the West campus.
  • 08:38Now the centers,
  • 08:39you know these disease centers,
  • 08:40I just say thought I'd say
  • 08:41a few words about that.
  • 08:42We talk about it a great deal.
  • 08:43That's the goal.
  • 08:44Centers of excellence,
  • 08:45multi modality centers of excellence,
  • 08:47taking care of lung cancer throughout
  • 08:50Connecticut throughout the network.
  • 08:51You know we have I I lose count.
  • 08:53What is it Eric,
  • 08:5415 sites
  • 08:55around We we are going to have experts
  • 08:57at all those sites seeing lung cancer.
  • 08:59We might not have every
  • 09:00discipline at each center,
  • 09:01but we will work as a team to
  • 09:03coordinate and really build a big tent,
  • 09:05bring the science to the patients.
  • 09:07The only way to continue to make progress
  • 09:08and I hope you'll see that at the end of
  • 09:10my hour is by bringing science to the clinic.
  • 09:12That's the theme of today's talk.
  • 09:15And we also have a spore.
  • 09:16So we began the spore now a God,
  • 09:18it's hard to believe almost 10 years ago.
  • 09:21We have three projects
  • 09:23in the spore cyclic 15,
  • 09:24which is and I'll tell you a lot about that,
  • 09:27that's actually featured in the CCSG grant
  • 09:29both in the DT and the immunology programs.
  • 09:31And what you'll it's a new agent developed
  • 09:33here at at at Yale and liping Shen's lab.
  • 09:36The mechanism based approach is to
  • 09:37targeting EGFR are very relevant to
  • 09:39the first part of my talk and brain
  • 09:41metastases which I'll talk about as well.
  • 09:43And you can see we have Coors and and
  • 09:44David and David's in the front row.
  • 09:46We have wonderful bio statistical core,
  • 09:48we have developmental programs and
  • 09:50we we were first funded in 2015.
  • 09:53So this effort began on March 1st, 2011.
  • 09:56When I arrived here we had a number
  • 09:58of submissions just for anyone
  • 10:00who is getting depressed.
  • 10:01It took three submissions to get
  • 10:03this score and so it's not easy
  • 10:05but it's it's been great and you're
  • 10:07gonna see and why in a moment.
  • 10:09And it was renewed in 2020 a lot more
  • 10:12easily and now we're gonna renew it
  • 10:14again because I've taken on a new
  • 10:15MPI and Doctor Paletti who's in the
  • 10:17front row and 2nd row and working
  • 10:19with Lee Ping who remains the Co Pi.
  • 10:21We're we're going back in in January.
  • 10:22So we we wanted to wait till the
  • 10:24core grant went in so we weren't
  • 10:26competing for the same resources.
  • 10:27Although there there is I guess a
  • 10:29site visit coming up too and the
  • 10:31beautiful thing about the Spore is we
  • 10:33have developmental projects over 50 of
  • 10:35them over the years and you can see
  • 10:37these are career enhancement program,
  • 10:39you know young investigators
  • 10:40who aren't working lung cancer,
  • 10:42we're getting them involved in lung cancer
  • 10:43and this is a developmental research program.
  • 10:46We could have 10 projects on the SPORE.
  • 10:48The problem is you can really only have
  • 10:49three projects on these grants because
  • 10:51the NCI continues to cut the funds.
  • 10:52We have developmental funds and and
  • 10:54and donor funds we used to enhance it.
  • 10:56But look at this,
  • 10:57all the different departments
  • 10:59that are involved,
  • 11:00it's building a community of
  • 11:01lung cancer here at Yale.
  • 11:02And I think they're about 17 or ones.
  • 11:06And this is the team.
  • 11:07And again,
  • 11:07I just want to point out Anna Esteppe here,
  • 11:10who now Ed Cafton,
  • 11:11actually Julie Boyer many years
  • 11:13ago was our initial
  • 11:15administrative leader and then
  • 11:16Ed Cafton for many years.
  • 11:17Now of course he's working closely
  • 11:19on the CCSG but there's Anna
  • 11:21Esteppe are now staff who who who
  • 11:22just is doing a phenomenal job and
  • 11:24actually made this slide for me.
  • 11:25We probably need a second slide.
  • 11:26These are all the people that are working
  • 11:28in the community of lung Cancer Research.
  • 11:29And then I just want to give
  • 11:31a little shout out to Katie.
  • 11:32So we had a little we went to New
  • 11:34York last week and maybe two weeks
  • 11:36ago now and Katie was honored by
  • 11:38the Lung Cancer Research Foundation
  • 11:39and see the multi modality in this
  • 11:41Shen Liu of the Sheriff Pathology
  • 11:44Valentina from genetics.
  • 11:45Some of us really, we're a community
  • 11:47that's tackling this disease.
  • 11:49So now let's do a little science.
  • 11:50I've already used 10 minutes up,
  • 11:51but you know, I'm always taking pictures.
  • 11:54You see why.
  • 11:56So So what about targeted therapy?
  • 11:57I'm going to tell you about targeted therapy,
  • 11:59immunotherapy in the future.
  • 12:00And I, I might skip through
  • 12:02some slides if it's going along.
  • 12:03So we have time for questions
  • 12:04because you're here in person.
  • 12:05We should be interactive.
  • 12:07Well,
  • 12:07I began when I when I I finished
  • 12:11my my work at Dana Farber.
  • 12:13I,
  • 12:14I,
  • 12:14I went to MD Anderson and I was
  • 12:15telling one of the fellows yesterday
  • 12:17when I was meeting with her,
  • 12:18it's all about the mentors
  • 12:20you have and I had worked,
  • 12:21I had been at Yale,
  • 12:22I had worked in Kim Darnell's
  • 12:24lab at at Rockefeller.
  • 12:24I was very interested in signal
  • 12:26transduction and I was very
  • 12:27interested in EGFR and EGFR receptor.
  • 12:29And just around that time the first
  • 12:31small molecules and antibodies
  • 12:32had been developed against EGFR
  • 12:34and we knew that in epithelial
  • 12:36tumors such as lung cancer,
  • 12:37EGFR was up regulated.
  • 12:39So I was very fortunate.
  • 12:41Juan Kihan,
  • 12:42who is my mentor and who had
  • 12:44recruited me to MD Anderson brought me
  • 12:46upstairs to the president's office.
  • 12:47John Mendelson,
  • 12:48who had worked in the e.g.
  • 12:49Fr field and these new molecules were
  • 12:51coming through and they they offered
  • 12:53me the project and I just said sure.
  • 12:55And I I,
  • 12:55I don't think I realized how
  • 12:57good it was at that time.
  • 12:58I knew that it was a good science
  • 12:59and the science was evolving and and
  • 13:01then we started to do clinical trials.
  • 13:02But also we worked in the lab to try
  • 13:04to identify biomarkers and I went
  • 13:06to start my first clinical trial
  • 13:08and a drug called ZD 1839 and the
  • 13:10investigator meeting was in Palm Beach,
  • 13:13FL which is nice.
  • 13:14My parents live there and then I
  • 13:15go to the hotel and who's sitting
  • 13:17across from me but Pat Larusso
  • 13:18that's when I met Pat in 1997 and we
  • 13:21started and we were the Co leaders
  • 13:24of this first trial of ZD 1839,
  • 13:26which became known as confitinib
  • 13:27and some might know it as Aressa.
  • 13:29And we started using this drug,
  • 13:30an oral agent against patients with
  • 13:33lung cancer, with what we would
  • 13:35call broncholoviral lung cancer.
  • 13:36And in one of 10 patients we saw this,
  • 13:38this clearing unheard of.
  • 13:39You saw the survival curves I showed you.
  • 13:41And these would be patients who could
  • 13:42hardly walk into the clinic and then a
  • 13:44week or two later they'd be feeling great.
  • 13:46We didn't know at that time
  • 13:48what the biomarkers were.
  • 13:49We thought it was easy of our expression.
  • 13:50It it wasn't.
  • 13:51Of course, mutations were found after
  • 13:53about 1002 thousand patients were
  • 13:55treated and and people looked back.
  • 13:57I'll show you that in a moment.
  • 13:58We we knew that it was women were
  • 14:00more likely to respond than men,
  • 14:01but it was really people who
  • 14:03had smoked less and smoking.
  • 14:04You know, if you smoke,
  • 14:05you're more likely to have
  • 14:06other mutations like K Ras.
  • 14:07And the never smokers did well,
  • 14:09we did a lot of skin biopsies.
  • 14:10That's that's when I first met Pat
  • 14:11because we were talking at the meeting
  • 14:12about doing skin biopsies and I was
  • 14:14at MD Anderson at the time and I said,
  • 14:15oh,
  • 14:15I need to bring in my dermatologist
  • 14:17and we need to do a contract and
  • 14:18Pat just gets up and says I do
  • 14:20them myself and then sew them up.
  • 14:21And I was a little scared of her at the time.
  • 14:22It was like pretty.
  • 14:23She was pretty intimidating and and and
  • 14:25now you know why she's been so successful.
  • 14:27She does it herself.
  • 14:29Well, then of course skipping a
  • 14:31little ahead because it's only an
  • 14:33hour talk about four years later,
  • 14:34five years later.
  • 14:35And John Mendelson and I used
  • 14:36to always talk about that.
  • 14:37How can we keep it?
  • 14:38Actually it was eight years later,
  • 14:40the mutations were discovered.
  • 14:41How can we do this more quickly?
  • 14:43That's why with all the work we're
  • 14:44doing with pathology and biomarkers,
  • 14:45we've got to be even quicker now.
  • 14:47But back then it took a while.
  • 14:48Sequencing techniques were still developing.
  • 14:50You know, it wasn't long before this.
  • 14:51We're just doing the Max and Gilbert
  • 14:53sequencing and reading the gels, right.
  • 14:54So but,
  • 14:54but a couple of centers,
  • 14:56Boston and New York took the samples from
  • 14:58patients who were getting these drugs.
  • 15:00These drugs went to what we call
  • 15:02an extended access trial.
  • 15:03People could get it off label while
  • 15:06that while we were waiting for the
  • 15:07drugs to be approved and many patients
  • 15:09were treated and of course it was
  • 15:10found that in the EGFR receptor,
  • 15:11which of course would be a dimer.
  • 15:12This is a simplification in
  • 15:14the tyrosine kinase domain.
  • 15:15There were specific mutations mostly at
  • 15:17that time discovered in exxons 19 and 21.
  • 15:19Now we see them in Exxon 20 as well.
  • 15:21And these mutations of course activated
  • 15:23and caused this to be a driver.
  • 15:25And then these small molecules bound
  • 15:27into the ATP binding site and we're very,
  • 15:29very potent.
  • 15:29They had some rash,
  • 15:30they had some diarrhea,
  • 15:31but they were very potent.
  • 15:32And that led to this is actually being
  • 15:34in a place like MD Anderson patients just
  • 15:36flowed in and we had a big phase one clinic.
  • 15:38I think we must have treated a couple 100
  • 15:40patients in the first two or three years and
  • 15:42I LED the trial and that's Cicely Harris.
  • 15:44She was one of the first patients.
  • 15:46And, you know, she was written up
  • 15:47in the Wall Street Journal because
  • 15:48the idea was we probably didn't.
  • 15:50We didn't cure her lung cancer.
  • 15:51She only lived for nine years,
  • 15:52but we prolonged her survival
  • 15:54with good quality of life.
  • 15:55And that's why Tara Parker Pope,
  • 15:57you know, wrote this article about her.
  • 15:59It's like insulin for diabetes
  • 16:01or or hypertensive medicine.
  • 16:02But that's the problem.
  • 16:04And it continues to be the problem
  • 16:05with EGFR mutated lung cancer.
  • 16:06I've been doing this for 25 plus years.
  • 16:08No one's unfortunately in the
  • 16:10advanced stage ever cured.
  • 16:11That's why the work that Katie
  • 16:12and her lab are doing.
  • 16:13Mark Lemon, I'll show you the project.
  • 16:14We have to find new agents because
  • 16:16we to always stay one step ahead
  • 16:18of the cancer and this just shows
  • 16:20that these are the first generation
  • 16:22drugs gafitinib and orlatinib.
  • 16:23This was known as OSI 774.
  • 16:25For those those interested,
  • 16:26this was actually a Pfizer drug
  • 16:28and Pfizer when they merged,
  • 16:30when they took over the Pharmacia drug,
  • 16:32they they went with the Pharmacia
  • 16:33product and made a bit of a mistake
  • 16:35because this drugs actually became
  • 16:36the the number one ETFR inhibitor.
  • 16:38These are, these are reversible inhibitors.
  • 16:39They're non specific for mutated cells
  • 16:41that get both wild type and mutated cells.
  • 16:44Then there was a second generation drug,
  • 16:46a fat nib,
  • 16:47which also blocked her two and her four.
  • 16:50You add more TKI activity,
  • 16:51you get more toxicity.
  • 16:53We actually did a big trial of
  • 16:55this with cetuximab showed some
  • 16:57increased activity but not enough.
  • 16:59And then of course the the third
  • 17:01generation drug asimertinib which
  • 17:02is an irreversible inhibitor which
  • 17:04has good brain penetration and it's
  • 17:05easier for our mutation specific.
  • 17:07So they'll there's less rash and diarrhea.
  • 17:09It can be given to patients for longer
  • 17:11periods of time without toxicity
  • 17:12and that's how it we were able to
  • 17:14move this drug to the earlier stage.
  • 17:16And this is just an example and
  • 17:18again I'm just giving you a bit
  • 17:19of an overview today,
  • 17:20but the most common mutation for
  • 17:22resistance is known as T790M And the
  • 17:24patients that have that this drug
  • 17:26lasimertinib you know was first studied
  • 17:28to target that resistance mutation
  • 17:30which is about 50% of the resistance
  • 17:32and you can see the activity that
  • 17:33was seen there over 6070% response.
  • 17:35And this quickly became the
  • 17:37front line agent again bring your
  • 17:38best drugs to the front line.
  • 17:40But again few if any are cured.
  • 17:42That's the problem.
  • 17:43That's what I'm gonna talk to you
  • 17:45about now I was at MD Anderson
  • 17:47and you know when you you know
  • 17:49here we put about 100
  • 17:51and 10120 patients on lung trials
  • 17:53in a Goodyear there we're putting
  • 17:55with three or 400 patients on trial.
  • 17:56But what I noticed I was leading
  • 17:58the group lung group there is we're
  • 18:00doing it on 20 different trials.
  • 18:01So we we said can we do one trial
  • 18:04and and and use biomarkers to
  • 18:06decide who should get which drug
  • 18:09and wasn't easy 'cause you know if
  • 18:11you have a group that's 20 people
  • 18:12everyone has their own favorite drug.
  • 18:14It it really is a a sociology project
  • 18:16and we didn't have a sociology department
  • 18:19there like we have here or or psychology.
  • 18:21But what we did is we actually
  • 18:23convinced the team that it would be
  • 18:25better for all of us to work together
  • 18:26on one trial and we used a little
  • 18:28bit of push and and and and and
  • 18:30there was a pull though because the
  • 18:32science was exciting and at that time
  • 18:34and and David Meta who's here now,
  • 18:36I work with him at that time we
  • 18:38we we we could get biopsies.
  • 18:40Core biopsies, prior to 2004,
  • 18:442005, most lung cancer biopsies
  • 18:46were fine needle aspirations.
  • 18:47You had a little bit of few cells,
  • 18:48maybe you made a cell block,
  • 18:49but you didn't have really
  • 18:51enough tissue for sequencing.
  • 18:52But now that sequencing
  • 18:53was coming to to bear.
  • 18:54We said can we do a trial called Battle
  • 18:56and we worked with a pathologist,
  • 18:58Ignacio Astuba Jack Lee,
  • 19:01a biostatistician,
  • 19:02Ed Kim now at City of Hope and
  • 19:04with our mentor Wang Ki Han.
  • 19:06We developed a trial we called Battle
  • 19:08and what we called it is biomarker
  • 19:10integrated approach of targeted
  • 19:11therapy for lung cancer elimination.
  • 19:13So what we did is we had four
  • 19:15or five different drugs.
  • 19:16We did a biopsy.
  • 19:17We got the result within 14 days
  • 19:19and then we used that result to say
  • 19:20this patient has an EGFR mutation,
  • 19:22they should go on herlatinib.
  • 19:23This patient has a VEGF up regulation,
  • 19:25they should go on VET detonib and
  • 19:27I actually think it's and we used
  • 19:29an adaptive statistical design and
  • 19:30I've talked about that here before.
  • 19:32The results did pan out.
  • 19:34We,
  • 19:35we found new biomarkers for VEGF inhibitors.
  • 19:37The EGFR mutation came out of the story.
  • 19:40Now of course you say we knew that already,
  • 19:41but we didn't.
  • 19:42This was before the mutation was fully
  • 19:44validated and we showed that core
  • 19:45biopsies were feasible and and safe.
  • 19:47And this is about when I came to Yale.
  • 19:49So when I came to Yale,
  • 19:50I said let's let's do a battle trial here.
  • 19:51And David RIM, my friend in the
  • 19:53front row and that's Jeff Sklar.
  • 19:54I miss good old Jeff.
  • 19:56You know,
  • 19:56he used to always be in the front row
  • 19:58at the grand rounds he'd be here and
  • 19:59I I said can we do a core biopsies?
  • 20:01And they told me we had one
  • 20:02table where we could do it.
  • 20:03You know, there's no, no capacity.
  • 20:05I was saying I should go back home and then
  • 20:07that that was Rocco who was
  • 20:09working with us from the CTO.
  • 20:11And that's Julie Boyer,
  • 20:12that's Emily who now works as an APRN.
  • 20:15She was a researcher nurse at the time.
  • 20:16We put a little team together and
  • 20:18we ended up putting about 40 or 50
  • 20:19patients on the on the battle trial.
  • 20:21Now it wasn't as many as a 300
  • 20:23MD Anderson but we started doing
  • 20:24a tissue based approach and and
  • 20:26the team started to work together
  • 20:28and and that that's how that was
  • 20:30we were doing that and that was
  • 20:31actually funded by an RO one that I
  • 20:34brought with me from from Anderson.
  • 20:36But moving to the what I want to tell
  • 20:37you about it in my first story is
  • 20:39how can we do better in lung cancer.
  • 20:41We're not going to do better by
  • 20:42using these targeted therapies
  • 20:43just in advanced disease.
  • 20:44We have to find the disease earlier
  • 20:46and we're finding disease early
  • 20:47because of screening and because of
  • 20:49smoking prevention and at the time
  • 20:51that someone comes in for smoking
  • 20:52prevention that's a teachable moment.
  • 20:54But we know that even in lung
  • 20:55cancer when you find it early you
  • 20:57know and so often they find it
  • 20:58in the emergency room these days,
  • 21:00right they're doing a cardiac
  • 21:01scan or some other scan.
  • 21:02Someone has a small nodule,
  • 21:03the five year old survival even
  • 21:05even there is only 60 to 74% that's
  • 21:07how metastatic lung cancer is.
  • 21:09And if it's stage 2 with a few other nodes,
  • 21:1147 to 55% and it happens to be
  • 21:14stage 3 with N2 lymph nodes or
  • 21:16stage 3 B 38% five year survival.
  • 21:18So even early disease even with chemotherapy
  • 21:21is not as curable as we would like.
  • 21:24So if someone has an EGFR mutation which
  • 21:26are about 1015% of the patients in the
  • 21:28Western world and as many as 40% in the East,
  • 21:31Asia,
  • 21:32China,
  • 21:32wouldn't it be nice if we could
  • 21:33and we know that the percentage
  • 21:35of mutations are about the same
  • 21:36across the spectrum of stages.
  • 21:37Wouldn't it be nice if we could
  • 21:39give the EGFR inhibitor earlier.
  • 21:40So that's that we we sat down about
  • 21:4310 years ago now a group of us
  • 21:45and I had a colleague Masa Hara
  • 21:47Suboi from Japan and Ylan Wu from
  • 21:50China working with AstraZeneca.
  • 21:52We said let's let's design this
  • 21:54trial now and they were very
  • 21:56proactive and and and they said,
  • 21:57yeah,
  • 21:57let's do it because they we knew an
  • 21:59active and trial would take a long time.
  • 22:01So that's the Adura trial and the idea
  • 22:03was to take patients who had been
  • 22:05completely resected for lung cancer
  • 22:07and you can see the eligibility here.
  • 22:10And then we stratified them by
  • 22:12their their stage 1B2 or 3A,
  • 22:13they all had R0 resections,
  • 22:15meaning all the tumor was removed
  • 22:17with clean margins.
  • 22:18We only took the two most
  • 22:20canonical EGFR mutations,
  • 22:2119 and 21 and we we did stratify by race.
  • 22:24About 2/3 of these patients were Asia.
  • 22:25You can imagine it.
  • 22:26There were more of these mutations in Asia,
  • 22:28so more patients went on there and
  • 22:30then the patients were randomized to
  • 22:32firstly they could get chemotherapy
  • 22:33if if it was deemed appropriate.
  • 22:34Most of this takes two and three
  • 22:36lung cancers, get chemotherapy,
  • 22:37platinum based chemotherapy and it's
  • 22:38about a 5 to 6% improvement in survival.
  • 22:40Not a lot but it does improve survival.
  • 22:43I I would use it because it's something but
  • 22:45then we randomized to either acimertinib
  • 22:47at 80 milligrams once a day or placebo.
  • 22:49I'm often criticized how could you do
  • 22:51a placebo, but there were no data.
  • 22:53There were plenty of trials before this
  • 22:54that had tried other EKFR inhibitors and
  • 22:56looked in this setting and nothing worked.
  • 22:58They're all too toxic.
  • 22:59But we figured this drug was brain penetrant,
  • 23:01it was EKFR mutation specific,
  • 23:03it could be used and it
  • 23:04would be safely administered.
  • 23:05So we used OSTEO Mertini versus placebo
  • 23:07and we treated for three years.
  • 23:08But the primary endpoint of this
  • 23:09trial was disease free survival,
  • 23:11no disease recurring.
  • 23:11Remember they started with no disease.
  • 23:13So we're seeing if anything recurs and the
  • 23:15trial was powered for a hazard ratio of .7,
  • 23:18meaning a 30% improvement.
  • 23:20So about I guess it's almost four
  • 23:22years ago now in April there was a
  • 23:24safety review of the trial going on.
  • 23:26We no efficacy but the cure
  • 23:27of that safety committee.
  • 23:28I don't know if anyone here has
  • 23:29ever been on a safety committee.
  • 23:31He said something's wrong here.
  • 23:32It looks like one of the groups is
  • 23:34doing better than the other and
  • 23:35normally it's the control group
  • 23:36is doing better and they stop the
  • 23:38trial but they actually looked at
  • 23:39it and said the the treatment group
  • 23:40is doing so much better,
  • 23:41it's unethical to keep the trial going.
  • 23:44So,
  • 23:44so we actually got a call it was in April.
  • 23:48We we looked at the data and and
  • 23:50actually the hazard ratio I'll show you
  • 23:52in a moment was so good that you'll
  • 23:54you'll see where things went after that.
  • 23:56So this is what we saw.
  • 23:57So this was depending on your religion,
  • 24:00it was Good Friday and Passover,
  • 24:01I I'll go with Passover,
  • 24:03but you can see here,
  • 24:04here it was in in in that year the
  • 24:05stakes 1B and 3A patients here are
  • 24:07patients who got the acid mertinib
  • 24:09in the adjuvant setting and here
  • 24:10is the control and the hazard ratio
  • 24:12was .2 or an 80% improvement.
  • 24:14So that that was phenomenal,
  • 24:17better than expected.
  • 24:18Of course,
  • 24:18you would expect that this would work,
  • 24:20but with this sort of separation and
  • 24:21this sort of result and it actually
  • 24:23made a plenary talk at ASCO that
  • 24:25year and then we've updated it
  • 24:27just earlier this year.
  • 24:28This is the,
  • 24:29this is actually the review at the
  • 24:31time when it would have normally
  • 24:33been been analyzed and it's still
  • 24:35.27 or 73% improvement.
  • 24:37So using a drug early keeps the disease
  • 24:39from recurring. Now where do you think
  • 24:42the disease is kept from recurring from?
  • 24:44Well, the first, I guess we'll show you
  • 24:46that all all parameters benefited sex,
  • 24:50age, whether or not the patient was
  • 24:51a prior smoker, Asian or non Asian,
  • 24:54all three stages, both mutations.
  • 24:56So you always do better with XN 19 deletion,
  • 24:58it's a loss of it's a deletion versus the
  • 25:00point mutation which can revert a bit
  • 25:01easier and you can see whether or not
  • 25:03the patient got adjuvant chemotherapy.
  • 25:05When you look at a forest pot like that,
  • 25:06for those who aren't used to it,
  • 25:07anything to the left of 1 is good.
  • 25:10And then if you look what happened is in
  • 25:13the patients who got out to Mercenib,
  • 25:16you can see actually let's start here,
  • 25:18here the patients got placebo 46%
  • 25:20who recurred.
  • 25:20You can see that many of those
  • 25:22are distant recurrences.
  • 25:24Whereas in the small number of
  • 25:25patients in the early data who who
  • 25:27who recurred on the ASA emergent
  • 25:28of on the treatment job drug only
  • 25:30about half as many were distant.
  • 25:32The drug is keeping patients
  • 25:33from getting distant metastases.
  • 25:35That's what causes patients to
  • 25:37die metastases to other organs,
  • 25:38brain, liver and bone.
  • 25:39And actually we looked at that
  • 25:41and this is pretty phenomenal.
  • 25:42This is looking at the brain as
  • 25:43the first site of recurrence,
  • 25:45which is a major issue.
  • 25:46If if you ask a patient with lung cancer,
  • 25:48he or she will tell you I'm
  • 25:49worried about my brain.
  • 25:50We just had AEAB for our spore last Monday.
  • 25:52That's exactly what our
  • 25:53patient advocate told us.
  • 25:54But you can see here's patients adjuvant
  • 25:57disease who got last Emergenib.
  • 25:59Here's the control group hazard
  • 26:00ratio for recurrence in the brain
  • 26:02.24 meaning a 76% decrease in in the
  • 26:05first recurrence being in the brain.
  • 26:07So it's keeping the tumor from the brain.
  • 26:09We'll we'll do this forever probably not
  • 26:11but but it did it for a long period of time.
  • 26:13We treated for three years and
  • 26:16here you can see now now everyone
  • 26:18was sceptical you know I don't I
  • 26:19I never used to do the Twitter.
  • 26:21Then I started doing the Twitter
  • 26:22because people said you have to
  • 26:24read the Twitter because people
  • 26:25are being critical of your data.
  • 26:26And now now and I don't know how to
  • 26:28do Twitter because it's called X and
  • 26:29I haven't figured that out yet but
  • 26:31there were all these people that said
  • 26:33well there's no survival benefit.
  • 26:34Now the drug got approved based
  • 26:36on disease free survival,
  • 26:37but there hadn't been a survival
  • 26:38benefit and we had to wait for a
  • 26:40number of years to have 20% of the
  • 26:42patients unfortunately die because
  • 26:43that was the end point that had been
  • 26:45pre specified to look at survival
  • 26:46and it's API you hate for that to
  • 26:48happen you know because I'd rather
  • 26:49there never be an end point because
  • 26:51you don't want anyone to succumb
  • 26:52to their disease.
  • 26:53But I got a call
  • 26:54last November that the trial was nearing
  • 26:56the end and it was very you'll see
  • 26:58a very interesting because Eric was
  • 27:00you know here and the ASCO President.
  • 27:02I'm thinking well this could
  • 27:03be an ASCO presentation.
  • 27:04So we're waiting for the data
  • 27:05to make sure over the, over the,
  • 27:07over the winter and and then about
  • 27:10March saw this curve and this
  • 27:12is the survival curve and again
  • 27:14it was a very big DFS benefit.
  • 27:15But in survival the hazard ratio is .49.
  • 27:18So here's the patients who got
  • 27:20osteomertinib and here's the control
  • 27:21and you can see at at five years,
  • 27:2488% versus 78%,
  • 27:25so 10% improvement in survival,
  • 27:27the hazard ratio .49,
  • 27:28so a 51% improvement in survival.
  • 27:31And remember the drug stopped
  • 27:32here at three years.
  • 27:33We only treated for three years.
  • 27:34So now we have to continue
  • 27:35to watch these patients.
  • 27:36We have liquid biopsy samples.
  • 27:37Hopefully next year I'll give
  • 27:38another grand rounds.
  • 27:39I have those samples.
  • 27:40I'm analyzing them now,
  • 27:41but we're not ready to talk
  • 27:43about them unfortunately yet.
  • 27:44And then it was pretty cool.
  • 27:45So who knew that Eric was
  • 27:46going to be the director here?
  • 27:48It's just like,
  • 27:48it's almost like an amazing coincidence.
  • 27:50He's the ASCO president and
  • 27:51there I am presenting it to the
  • 27:53plenary beside him and Kimi Ying.
  • 27:54It was really pretty cool.
  • 27:55And you little can't make this stuff up.
  • 27:57It just sort of happened, right Eric,
  • 27:58it's who would have known?
  • 27:59So it was really, that was phenomenal.
  • 28:02I was pretty nervous.
  • 28:03The only the best thing about,
  • 28:05best thing about the plenary
  • 28:06is the green room,
  • 28:07the drinks and the food in there.
  • 28:08Phenomenal.
  • 28:09See, that's that's the secret of the ASCO.
  • 28:11OK.
  • 28:12Now you you see the overall
  • 28:15survival both if patients got
  • 28:16actually in chemotherapy or
  • 28:17without actually in chemotherapy.
  • 28:19So you give it if you know sometimes
  • 28:22patients don't want it and there's
  • 28:23a big push now to avoid the
  • 28:25chemotherapy we're looking at that.
  • 28:26But right now we we we we we we
  • 28:28we we suggest that patients get
  • 28:30chemotherapy if they can And then
  • 28:32you know the the big critique
  • 28:33of this trial and for those that
  • 28:34read the New England Journal,
  • 28:35there's there's a letter I I
  • 28:37responded to a letter today from
  • 28:39an investigator in Italy who
  • 28:40said well you didn't not all
  • 28:41your patients got ostomertinib.
  • 28:42So it's not really a fair trial
  • 28:44and they're right.
  • 28:45Not everyone could get ostomertinib.
  • 28:47But look in the ostomertinib
  • 28:48group and in the placebo group
  • 28:50about 8080 to 90% got an EGFR
  • 28:52inhibitor in a second line setting
  • 28:55did only 43% got ostomertinib.
  • 28:56But the drug wasn't even improved
  • 28:57in the front line setting
  • 28:58when we started the trial.
  • 28:59So well it's not perfect,
  • 29:01it's not a perfect would would
  • 29:02patients have done better if they
  • 29:04got an osteomordinib early probably.
  • 29:05But I I would what we said in this
  • 29:08reply is the difference is so great.
  • 29:11I think use your best drugs earlier and
  • 29:14I think this these data hold hold water and
  • 29:17then you know it's not without toxicity.
  • 29:20Be careful as physicians,
  • 29:21as nurses, as caregivers, you know,
  • 29:22it's easy for you to say there's no problem
  • 29:24when you're giving a drug versus a placebo,
  • 29:26there's always going to be added
  • 29:28toxicity and this drug does cause some
  • 29:29rack and it does cause some diarrhea
  • 29:31and it is debilitating for patients in,
  • 29:33in about 4 to 5% of the cases.
  • 29:35We have to be sensitive to that.
  • 29:36Some patients need breaks,
  • 29:37some need dose reductions.
  • 29:39But for the most part, if you look
  • 29:41at discontinuations and serious AE,
  • 29:43there were 14% on placebo versus 20%
  • 29:45on the drug which is pretty low.
  • 29:47But again there is toxicity and this
  • 29:49is where quality of life and you know
  • 29:51the survivorship clinic and others,
  • 29:52you know we need to look at this
  • 29:54and help patients.
  • 29:55So what's in the future,
  • 29:57we're continuing to file the overall
  • 29:59survival because what's going to
  • 30:01happen in five years and 10 years,
  • 30:02we're doing a bunch of
  • 30:04translational analysis.
  • 30:04We're going to have Pasayani here for the
  • 30:07Calabrese lecture this year and he's going
  • 30:09to tell us about procester Tri cells,
  • 30:10which he studies and Katie
  • 30:12studies these as well.
  • 30:13There are still cells that remain that
  • 30:15remain resistant to to EGFR inhibitors.
  • 30:17We actually have blood from
  • 30:18about 1/3 of the patients.
  • 30:19It's very hard to get samples out of China,
  • 30:23but from the Western world and from Japan,
  • 30:25we do have blood samples and tissue samples.
  • 30:27So we're looking at at at at that.
  • 30:29We're also looking at, you know,
  • 30:31there are trials looking at
  • 30:32neoactuvent osteomerotradium.
  • 30:33Now that's all the rage right now.
  • 30:34We're looking at earlier disease.
  • 30:37Adura 2 is looking at this
  • 30:39was stage 1B disease,
  • 30:40so more than 3 centimeters.
  • 30:41Everyone always calls me
  • 30:42what about the small tumors,
  • 30:43I think it'll probably work there too.
  • 30:45But we need to do the trial and
  • 30:46we're actually doing a trial where
  • 30:47we're giving the drug for five more
  • 30:48years because there is some sense
  • 30:49when you stop the drug that the the
  • 30:51brain metastasis started to increase.
  • 30:52So there might be some patients
  • 30:54who are cured in my opinion,
  • 30:55but some who are just having cytostatic
  • 30:57stability of disease and that's
  • 30:59something we have to figure out.
  • 31:01So I'll just end this portion
  • 31:02of the talk with this slide.
  • 31:03So another mentor of mine,
  • 31:04I don't know if anyone knew Josh Fiddler,
  • 31:06but I I,
  • 31:06I actually when I was at MD Anderson,
  • 31:08I had a small lab with him and and Josh
  • 31:11used to always say metastases are are
  • 31:13are what would kill patients and he
  • 31:15talked about the metastasis cascade.
  • 31:17So I think what we've really shown
  • 31:18here is we've taken our best surgery
  • 31:20and chemotherapy and we've added
  • 31:22targeted therapy to keep patients
  • 31:23from progressing in the brain,
  • 31:25liver and bone.
  • 31:25And I think this is a paradigm
  • 31:27now we're going to see more of
  • 31:28the drug was approved as I said in 2020.
  • 31:31There are a whole host of other mutations.
  • 31:32As I mentioned,
  • 31:33there's a trial called Alina that will
  • 31:35be in the news in two weeks from today,
  • 31:36you'll hear about Alina, this is electinib,
  • 31:38it's the Roche drug for ALC.
  • 31:40And we, we have a press release that
  • 31:43that trial is positive for disease,
  • 31:45for disease free survival.
  • 31:46And I bet they're not going to
  • 31:48say wait for overall survival.
  • 31:49I think based on the Adura results
  • 31:51and actually Anne and I are going to
  • 31:53the American Medical Association next
  • 31:54week for clinical trials meeting and I
  • 31:56think at that meeting we're going to
  • 31:57discuss this trial because as a paradigm
  • 31:59what should the right end point be,
  • 32:00you know in in patients
  • 32:02in the accident setting.
  • 32:04But I think we've shown that
  • 32:05disease free survival works. OK.
  • 32:07And here's a little plug for Katie.
  • 32:09I don't have time to talk about this,
  • 32:11but Katie and and Sarah and Mark,
  • 32:13what an amazing team,
  • 32:14Mark's a little younger there.
  • 32:16So here, here, here's the group,
  • 32:18I'm,
  • 32:18I'm a little older so here here's
  • 32:20here's the group that that that's
  • 32:22been meeting and you know Mark's
  • 32:24now the Chief of Pharmacology and
  • 32:26super duper team obtaining samples.
  • 32:27You can see we have Anna and
  • 32:29Heather and the entire team are
  • 32:31getting samples from the clinic.
  • 32:32We're banking the samples,
  • 32:34we're looking at these samples
  • 32:35that's how science is going to be
  • 32:37made and understanding resistance.
  • 32:38And then we also have a project three of
  • 32:41the spore looking at brain metastases.
  • 32:43I'm just putting a little plug
  • 32:44in for that that project.
  • 32:45No time to talk about it today.
  • 32:47And then we oh, this is important.
  • 32:48We have an alliance with AstraZeneca.
  • 32:50This has been critical for the
  • 32:51sport because by developing industry
  • 32:53alliances and this is one of the
  • 32:54things I've been working on with the
  • 32:56Dean's office in the last year and
  • 32:57a half and I'm really enjoying it,
  • 32:58working very closely with MENA Wang,
  • 33:00who's pictured down here.
  • 33:01And here's Kathy Lynch from Yale Ventures.
  • 33:04There's Pat.
  • 33:04We, we, we,
  • 33:05we started this together about 5-7 years ago.
  • 33:08Here we are in Cambridge 2017 and
  • 33:122022 we all look the same and and
  • 33:14you can see that this this is just
  • 33:17an amazing collaboration because
  • 33:18that's how we're we're really making
  • 33:20difference and I I got to move on but
  • 33:22this this is the timeline of that
  • 33:23alliance and here's the most recent
  • 33:25visit actually Dean Brown was with us.
  • 33:27We we're really we're getting
  • 33:29funds but we're getting drugs
  • 33:31and compounds test compounds.
  • 33:33Marcus I see in the front row.
  • 33:34I know he's very excited about this.
  • 33:35It really is the way we're bringing
  • 33:37this in and we're expanding this
  • 33:38now to head and neck cancers.
  • 33:40We're heading to breast cancer and
  • 33:41other other cancers in the future.
  • 33:43So this is going to be something
  • 33:45that's with AstraZeneca and
  • 33:46other companies that will,
  • 33:47I think be very important.
  • 33:49So just in the last 20 minutes,
  • 33:50a little bit about immunotherapy.
  • 33:54That's also an amazing new paradigm in
  • 33:56lung cancer targeting immunotherapy and
  • 33:58of course the checkpoint inhibitors.
  • 34:00You know, the first trials
  • 34:01were done here at Yale.
  • 34:02I don't know if everyone realizes that.
  • 34:04And of course, we have Lee Ping Chen here.
  • 34:06There's a very nice article about
  • 34:08him in fierce Biotech yesterday
  • 34:09talking about his contribution to the
  • 34:12development and discovery of PDL 1.
  • 34:14So this is the probably the
  • 34:15first responder in lung cancer.
  • 34:17I don't know if Scott.
  • 34:18Scott's probably in clinic now
  • 34:19because that's why he sees so many
  • 34:21patients and helps so many people.
  • 34:22So this is a patient Maureen
  • 34:25who came to Yale Squamous lung
  • 34:26cancer wasn't a candidate for any
  • 34:28of those targeted therapies,
  • 34:293 times refractory lung cancer.
  • 34:31And June 2010 she went
  • 34:32on the trial of MDX one,
  • 34:34one O 6 that Mario was running with
  • 34:37Scott and Harriet and you can see these
  • 34:39large tumors in her lung and her liver.
  • 34:41Within months they responded.
  • 34:42The trial was for two years of
  • 34:44what we now know as novolumab.
  • 34:46Here she is a year 8,
  • 34:47but her X-rays look this way.
  • 34:49Now she comes back.
  • 34:50We've seen her.
  • 34:51I'm sure Tara's seen her at some
  • 34:52of the survivor events.
  • 34:53This is the promise of a phase one
  • 34:55trial of new drug development.
  • 34:57The problem is this is only 15%
  • 35:00but for This is why everyone
  • 35:01wants to work in this field.
  • 35:02We see a light at the end of the tunnel.
  • 35:03It's just a very long tunnel,
  • 35:05but we know that 15% of patients
  • 35:06are going to benefit.
  • 35:08And then Scott and he he ran
  • 35:11this trial OO 3:00 and basically
  • 35:13this is an actuarial survival
  • 35:14curve because it's now with more
  • 35:16than five years of follow up.
  • 35:18He published this in JCO in 2018 at
  • 35:20five years in the refractory setting on
  • 35:23the volnab 16% of patients are alive.
  • 35:26And when I use this slide to teach
  • 35:27in my clinical trials course,
  • 35:29I talk about the tail of the curve
  • 35:31because this is a non proportional hazards.
  • 35:33You have two slopes, 1 here,
  • 35:34one here.
  • 35:35We know that there's a tail problem is
  • 35:37how do we get more people off the tail.
  • 35:39These patients have primary resistance.
  • 35:40There are other things going on.
  • 35:42Maybe it's another checkpoint,
  • 35:43maybe it's a regulatory T cell.
  • 35:45This is why we shouldn't just
  • 35:46study the next PD1 inhibitor
  • 35:47or the next PDL 1 inhibitor.
  • 35:48We need to think about what's going
  • 35:50on in the micro environment and
  • 35:51I'll show you how we're doing that.
  • 35:53So just quickly keynote one, Paul.
  • 35:55ADA ran this trial here at Yale a decade ago.
  • 36:00It was Melanoma lung cancer,
  • 36:01small cell lung cancer.
  • 36:03This was with Keytruda with
  • 36:04tembrelizumab that led to a trial
  • 36:06that I LED called KEYNOTE 10,
  • 36:08which established PDL 1 as a biomarker.
  • 36:11If you have high levels of PDL one,
  • 36:12you do better than if you have lower levels.
  • 36:15That led to using the,
  • 36:17the pembrolizumab in the frontline setting
  • 36:19and then that led to accurate therapy.
  • 36:22Sarah Goldberg and and and Harriet
  • 36:24working with Veronica Shang,
  • 36:25they did the first study,
  • 36:26the very first study and this is when
  • 36:28we're saying we we can get this study.
  • 36:30We got this still plan on in three
  • 36:32months and we're getting back to that.
  • 36:33They did a study where investigator
  • 36:35initiated study where they took
  • 36:36pembrolizumab because we're already
  • 36:38working with Merck and they did it in
  • 36:40and we're still getting data from this.
  • 36:42And we took patients with small brain meds,
  • 36:44they had to be less than two centimeters
  • 36:46and we treated those patients with, with,
  • 36:48with the drug without any radiation.
  • 36:50If someone's going to live for 2-3 years,
  • 36:52the the one year survival with pembrolizumab
  • 36:54and a high PDL one patient is 35%.
  • 36:56So if you're going to be alive,
  • 36:58actually the five year survival is 35%,
  • 37:00excuse me.
  • 37:00So if you're going to be alive in five years,
  • 37:01you'd rather be alive without any
  • 37:03cognitive impairment from radiation.
  • 37:04So this was really established in this
  • 37:06trial that was both a collaboration
  • 37:07between Melanoma and the lung cancer
  • 37:09group and you can see here's extra
  • 37:11cerebral response and brain response
  • 37:12and you can see they're about equal.
  • 37:14And Harriet, it won't tell you this,
  • 37:16but I'll tell you this and it
  • 37:17wasn't the New York Times.
  • 37:17So I'm not reaching any, any confidentiality.
  • 37:20But when a 99 year old ex president had
  • 37:22Melanoma in the brain about eight years ago,
  • 37:25they called us at Yale.
  • 37:26And while Curran asked what are you
  • 37:28doing with pembrolizumab in that setting?
  • 37:30And you can,
  • 37:31you can put the pieces together yourself.
  • 37:33So what about precision medicine?
  • 37:34How can that help?
  • 37:36Well,
  • 37:37David RIM,
  • 37:37I was asked to be the discussion
  • 37:40at ASCO about six years ago for
  • 37:42the early studies on the Volumab.
  • 37:43So I went to my my good friend David,
  • 37:45who by the way used to work on breast
  • 37:46cancer and he moved over to lung
  • 37:48cancer and now Eric's getting him back
  • 37:49and I'm a little worried about that.
  • 37:51But but but it's OK.
  • 37:52He works on the head and export too.
  • 37:54The very the pathologists are
  • 37:56your pathologists,
  • 37:57your your your statisticians,
  • 37:59critical core members.
  • 38:00For any of these grants,
  • 38:01you've got to have a good course
  • 38:02and that we always get exceptional
  • 38:04thanks to David and Kurt and
  • 38:05now Sonia's working with them.
  • 38:06So you can see, I said, David,
  • 38:08why is this PDL one marker so,
  • 38:10so bad And Li Ping was with us and
  • 38:12Li Ping said of course it's not bad.
  • 38:14I discovered it.
  • 38:15It's actually very good,
  • 38:16but you just don't measure it properly.
  • 38:18And then David made this slide for me
  • 38:20that everyone's now used and and I
  • 38:21make sure the credit was there David.
  • 38:23So everyone uses this and and
  • 38:25David has done very
  • 38:27well at meetings and and and
  • 38:28being involved in the panels.
  • 38:30Here's one piece of lung cancer,
  • 38:31one tissue piece and two different areas.
  • 38:34One area is stone cold negative for PDL,
  • 38:36one for two different antibodies and one
  • 38:38area is positive with two different results,
  • 38:40you know slightly different and it
  • 38:41it matters where you measure it.
  • 38:42The the green is cytokeratin,
  • 38:44so that's tumor. The the blue,
  • 38:46the Dappy is the nuclei and that and
  • 38:47you can see the the red is PDL one.
  • 38:49It could be either in the tumor
  • 38:51or the stroma.
  • 38:51So it's the variability of
  • 38:53measurement and the sensitivity asset.
  • 38:55But you gotta have PDL ONE for
  • 38:57PD1 and PDL 1 blockers to work.
  • 38:59And we have, we're so fortunate.
  • 39:01So Katie deserved 2 awards last
  • 39:04week because she and Scott set up
  • 39:07this amazing repeat biopsy program.
  • 39:09That's why we got to make sure the
  • 39:11freezers are backed up in our office.
  • 39:12And we also have to make sure we
  • 39:14have more liquid nitrogen because
  • 39:15these samples are so valuable
  • 39:17because for the last decade,
  • 39:18the lung group has been collecting
  • 39:20samples when someone comes in and they
  • 39:22have recurrent disease and they've
  • 39:23putting a little plug in for the.
  • 39:25When someone comes in and
  • 39:26they have recurrent disease,
  • 39:28we actually get consent to
  • 39:29get their old biopsy.
  • 39:31And then when we get the new biopsy,
  • 39:32the biopsy's done with the help of the team.
  • 39:34And there's Anna and Heather
  • 39:35works with her sometimes goopang,
  • 39:37I don't know if he's here
  • 39:38or maybe he's online.
  • 39:38The team gets a fresh biopsy and and we
  • 39:41get fresh tissue and we get paraffin,
  • 39:43we make transgenic, we make,
  • 39:44we make PDX mice, This is, this is.
  • 39:47And zenta or pathologist is usually
  • 39:49there to make sure we get good tissue.
  • 39:51This is the key,
  • 39:53having samples from refractory patients.
  • 39:54We started this with TKIS,
  • 39:56but then we did this with IO agents.
  • 39:58We went and have the spore 10 years
  • 39:59ago if we didn't have this data set.
  • 40:01And we've used this both with our
  • 40:03own samples and with industry.
  • 40:05This is a very nice trial that
  • 40:07Scott and I and others did with
  • 40:09the drug known as MDX 1107.
  • 40:11Now it's known as pembro as a tezalizumab.
  • 40:14So this was a phase one trial which we
  • 40:16led here at Yale and it actually was
  • 40:18published in Nature almost a decade ago.
  • 40:20But in this trial,
  • 40:21we had patients with lung cancer
  • 40:22who responded to a PDL 1 inhibitor.
  • 40:24But because we could get those fresh
  • 40:26biopsies, we had pre and post biopsies.
  • 40:28So here's a prebiopsy on this
  • 40:30responding patient and you can see
  • 40:31you know CD 8 positive T cells and
  • 40:33then post you can see a lot more.
  • 40:34This is what you call the adaptive
  • 40:36immune response.
  • 40:36This is,
  • 40:37this is the blocking the PD1 PDL
  • 40:39one up regulation of interferon
  • 40:40T cells coming to the tumor and
  • 40:43then using an RNA chip.
  • 40:44And why did this?
  • 40:45Why did we get this trial?
  • 40:47Ira Melman, good old Ira Melman
  • 40:49had moved to Genentech and I
  • 40:50went out and had dinner with him.
  • 40:52I I had remembered IRA from cell
  • 40:54biology that was when I was at
  • 40:56Rockefeller done but but still
  • 40:57I knew Ira and Ira helped us to
  • 40:58get this trial and and with IRA's
  • 40:59group did this work for us the
  • 41:01RNA shift and you can see pre and
  • 41:03post green is pre yellow is post.
  • 41:05You can see this is an example
  • 41:06of what's happening when the
  • 41:07immune response is active.
  • 41:08So we we understand what the active
  • 41:10immune response is how is how do we
  • 41:12get this to go on in every patient
  • 41:1420% of patients responded in that
  • 41:16trial but the other 80% did not
  • 41:17and those patients that did not we
  • 41:20described in this paper the immune
  • 41:21desert you know CD 8 before and
  • 41:23after the tumor just laughs at,
  • 41:25at the PDL 1 inhibitor nothing happens
  • 41:27or you can have a non functional
  • 41:29immune response where you have some
  • 41:30CD8 cells and maybe a few more posts.
  • 41:32But if you look at that immune
  • 41:34shift completely flat and then this
  • 41:35is actually something we're seeing
  • 41:36more and more of and I don't have
  • 41:38time to talk about it today but our
  • 41:39next trial on the sport is going
  • 41:41to target this that that the cells
  • 41:43that get inhibited that can't get
  • 41:44to the tumor because you get this
  • 41:46line of interference and we call
  • 41:48this the the immune excluded cells.
  • 41:51So more to come on this,
  • 41:52I'm going to skip this for the sake of time.
  • 41:56We just have to do a little editing.
  • 42:02So I I will just say that now all
  • 42:05these agents are moving up up front.
  • 42:08We're we're now in the process of
  • 42:10taking immune therapies that are being
  • 42:11used in the neo accurate setting.
  • 42:13And it's actually a very fertile time
  • 42:15because when we sit at the tumor board,
  • 42:17we have to decide are we going to do
  • 42:19surgery and accurate therapy like
  • 42:20I showed you for TKI inhibitor.
  • 42:22So we're going to use the neoactivant
  • 42:24therapy 1st and we're seeing about 15%
  • 42:26half CR rate and a 30 to 40% minor CR
  • 42:31rate PR minor major PR rate, excuse me,
  • 42:34when we use these agents upfront.
  • 42:36So that's going to be the next stage
  • 42:39neoactivant trials and I just want
  • 42:40to make a plug for tumor boards.
  • 42:42This is sort of what our tumor
  • 42:43boards look like lately.
  • 42:44So I I would just like to as long
  • 42:46as I have the podium today encourage
  • 42:47people to go to tumor board and start
  • 42:49having our tumor boards hybrid.
  • 42:51We can't have them all in person
  • 42:52because we're 15 sites.
  • 42:54But the tumor board discussions
  • 42:55are going to be really critical.
  • 42:57These are drugs that were approved from
  • 42:59Yale LED studies very proud of that.
  • 43:01All these drugs had some of their
  • 43:03first studies here at Yale in the
  • 43:04lung program and we have many more
  • 43:06to come and we're seeing that in
  • 43:08all of our programs and that's our
  • 43:10experimental Therapeutics or DT.
  • 43:11We can do the science on these studies.
  • 43:13But the reason I skipped is I'm much
  • 43:15more interested to tell you about the future.
  • 43:17So we're we now have to target
  • 43:19immunotherapy but I showed you at
  • 43:21the beginning of my talk was how
  • 43:23we used targeted therapy.
  • 43:24We understood the target brought it
  • 43:26earlier to have the greatest advantage and
  • 43:29I told you about the the biobank we have.
  • 43:33Well let me show you how it has paid off.
  • 43:35So here we had patients who had
  • 43:37immune therapy and they responded
  • 43:38and then they had more immune therapy
  • 43:40and they became resistant.
  • 43:42So thanks to that poor protocol that we've
  • 43:44had running for I guess what what Katie,
  • 43:4612 years or or more,
  • 43:47right.
  • 43:47And we now have tumor tissue,
  • 43:50germline DNA pretreatment and that
  • 43:52resistance and working with Rick
  • 43:54Lifton a number of years back before
  • 43:56he left and and his lab,
  • 43:58we we we sequenced all those tumors.
  • 44:01And very interestingly you can see
  • 44:03here the 14 tumors and you can see
  • 44:05the first response shown here in
  • 44:06the green and the resistance shown
  • 44:08in the yellow triangle.
  • 44:10So we had pre and post samples on
  • 44:11patients who responded and then
  • 44:13became resistant to immune therapy.
  • 44:14And you can see it was from a
  • 44:16hodgepodge of different trials,
  • 44:17some with anti PDL 1, some with anti PD.
  • 44:19One the drugs are different but quite
  • 44:21frankly for this type of analysis I
  • 44:23don't think it makes much of a difference.
  • 44:25Well, two stories emerge from this.
  • 44:27They've both been published
  • 44:28several years back,
  • 44:29one that that Katie and Scott LED
  • 44:31where we actually had one patient.
  • 44:32This patient was on Tremolomab and
  • 44:34Debiolomab had a tumor that responded
  • 44:37and then it became resistant.
  • 44:38And actually by looking at
  • 44:40the the biopsies pre and post,
  • 44:41we didn't see much different in PDL one.
  • 44:44But what we did see is this is
  • 44:47loss of beta 2 microglobulin.
  • 44:49So if you look at copy number,
  • 44:51there was already lost a pre immunotherapy.
  • 44:54The patient had already lost one
  • 44:55copy of Beta 2 microglobulin.
  • 44:57And then when the patient became resistant,
  • 44:59they lost both copies of Beta 2
  • 45:01blackroglobulin and Beta 2 microglobulin of
  • 45:03course is an essential component of MHC one.
  • 45:05So these tumors lost the ability
  • 45:07to present neo anakin to T cells.
  • 45:10So we are actually seeing that about
  • 45:11five to 10% of the time in lung cancer.
  • 45:13So these patients are going
  • 45:15to need more of this.
  • 45:16This immune approach won't work.
  • 45:18We need to use other other ways.
  • 45:20Maybe the innate immune system's going
  • 45:21to be the way we target these tumors
  • 45:23and K cells or something like that.
  • 45:25And then what what Kurt and and David did
  • 45:27is this is quantitative amino fluorescence.
  • 45:29We took a whole bunch of
  • 45:30samples of responders,
  • 45:31non responders.
  • 45:31These are samples that Scott had
  • 45:33collected over the years and we
  • 45:34looked at those samples and we
  • 45:36stained for CD3 and and when double
  • 45:38labeling and we looked at CD3.
  • 45:40So we looked for tumors that were low CD3,
  • 45:42so low T cells.
  • 45:43We looked at tumors that were low CD3,
  • 45:46high CD3 and low grand Simon Ki 67 and
  • 45:48the idea there were these are tumors
  • 45:50that were not activated in their T cells.
  • 45:53And then we looked at some tumors
  • 45:55that were high CD3 and high Granzyme
  • 45:57and KS 67 and that Granzyme and KS 67
  • 45:59are the are the white and the green.
  • 46:02And I would have predicted that
  • 46:04this is the group Group C here
  • 46:06that would have done the best.
  • 46:07But interestingly the group that did
  • 46:10best was you can see here's here's
  • 46:12the the type 2 group shown here,
  • 46:15high CD3 and low granzyme and low KS 67.
  • 46:18So why is the group that has many
  • 46:19T cells but has the non activated
  • 46:21T cells doing better?
  • 46:22And that was something we really
  • 46:24couldn't explain until recently when
  • 46:26Li Ping Chen and and Kurt and others.
  • 46:28Miguel Sanam Ahmed who was in Li
  • 46:31Ping's lab did a study and actually
  • 46:33using citep analysis showed that
  • 46:34many of those T cells that are
  • 46:36in the tumor are burned out,
  • 46:37they're they're not active.
  • 46:38And it probably explains why
  • 46:40chemotherapy works with immunotherapy
  • 46:41because chemotherapy kills the T
  • 46:42cells that are in the tumor micro
  • 46:44environment making room for more
  • 46:45active and newer T cells to come in.
  • 46:47This is a work in progress and we need
  • 46:49fresh tumor samples to study this more.
  • 46:51But the idea is that it's
  • 46:52the quality of the
  • 46:53T cells of the tumor that matters,
  • 46:54not just whether the T
  • 46:56cells are there or not.
  • 46:58In the last few minutes,
  • 46:59I just want to tell you about one
  • 47:00more story and that's how how,
  • 47:02how we, how we, how we look at resistance.
  • 47:04So what we're thinking here in
  • 47:06our group is when we looked at
  • 47:09250 cases of of lung cancer,
  • 47:11you can see that about 70% of these
  • 47:14tumors were high PDL one and high kill.
  • 47:17So they have a lot of PDL one and
  • 47:18a lot of T cells in the tumor.
  • 47:20These are probably the tumors that
  • 47:22responded quite well to immunotherapy.
  • 47:24But here's another 26% of tumors
  • 47:26that have high tail.
  • 47:27There's a lot of blue but no PDL 1,
  • 47:29so probably suggest there's
  • 47:31another checkpoint in play.
  • 47:32And then very interestingly 45 or twenty
  • 47:377057% of lung cancers are cold.
  • 47:38So it's really these type 1 tumors
  • 47:40I've already talked to you about.
  • 47:41These are the type 2.
  • 47:42I'm sorry, these,
  • 47:43these are the tumors that probably respond,
  • 47:45have a durable responder, Maureen.
  • 47:47They either require resistance
  • 47:48like I just showed you or they're
  • 47:49probably resistant for mechanisms
  • 47:51we don't yet understand.
  • 47:52But it's the other other tumor types
  • 47:53that we've been targeting in the
  • 47:55spore and type three of the tumors
  • 47:57that must have some other checkpoint.
  • 47:58So Li Ping and you know,
  • 48:01I became involved with this 'cause I
  • 48:03did a sabbatical in this lab in 2015
  • 48:05and they were working on this project.
  • 48:07I said can we bring this
  • 48:08project into the spore?
  • 48:09And and he,
  • 48:09he said sure he was developing it
  • 48:11with a company called Nexcure and
  • 48:13this is a drug known as cyclic
  • 48:1515 and I'm running low on time,
  • 48:16but basically this is a homolog to PDL one
  • 48:19and in in tumors that are interferon high,
  • 48:22you know that activates PDL one,
  • 48:23but it actually down regulates cyclic 15.
  • 48:25So it makes sense that this,
  • 48:27this marker,
  • 48:28this,
  • 48:28this protein might be more important
  • 48:30in tumors that are PDL one negative
  • 48:33and actually that's been shown.
  • 48:34So here's cyclic 15 and here's
  • 48:36PDL one and you can see in
  • 48:38tumors that that have cyclic 15,
  • 48:40it's a suppressor of T cells.
  • 48:43So the idea was could this be
  • 48:44an alternate target we can use
  • 48:46in these tumors that are low
  • 48:47PDL one and the answer is yes,
  • 48:49we were involved in the phase one trial,
  • 48:51Pat Larusso was API on that.
  • 48:52We did that with a company,
  • 48:54There's a company sponsored trial.
  • 48:55Often times you have to do the first
  • 48:57trial with a company and then your
  • 48:58next trial can be your own Ind.
  • 48:59So the first trial was a company
  • 49:01sponsored trial and you can see
  • 49:02here's patients two patients with
  • 49:03lung cancer who had response,
  • 49:05one with a complete response,
  • 49:06one with a partial response.
  • 49:09That response and lung cancer wasn't
  • 49:10here at Yale but this was a patient
  • 49:12who had already had immunotherapy
  • 49:13and failed and you can see they're
  • 49:14responding to the CIGLIC 15.
  • 49:16But the phase one team we Katie Kirk
  • 49:20was here we got a nice picture at
  • 49:21least she she did the picture not me
  • 49:23she had her own photographer with and
  • 49:25and then this is what I want to show you.
  • 49:27Scott Gettinger has these data I
  • 49:29presented on his behalf because
  • 49:30he couldn't make the meeting.
  • 49:31But this is Scott's work.
  • 49:33Scott has LED a trial of NC 318,
  • 49:35which is the antibody against
  • 49:37ciglic 15 and this is totally
  • 49:38investigator initiated.
  • 49:39Yale holds the I and D We've put
  • 49:41almost 40 patients on this trial.
  • 49:43We have two arms of the drug alone,
  • 49:44different schedules.
  • 49:45Then we combine the drug with pembrolizumab,
  • 49:48the PD1 inhibitor.
  • 49:49We also have an arm of IO naive patients.
  • 49:52We're just starting,
  • 49:53so we've been studying this here at Yale.
  • 49:55We've been getting biopsies pre and post
  • 49:56and again I don't have a lot of time left,
  • 49:58but I'll just get cut to the chase.
  • 50:00The biomarker that David's been
  • 50:02developing has been helpful to to date.
  • 50:04We as always happens,
  • 50:05we don't get biomarker on the
  • 50:06patients that have the best response.
  • 50:08We actually just had another
  • 50:09response yesterday.
  • 50:10So stay tuned.
  • 50:11But what we have done is we've looked
  • 50:12at patients and we've looked at a
  • 50:14number of patients have benefited
  • 50:16some of them that are getting
  • 50:18pembrolizumab plus cyclip 15 and
  • 50:19some of them cyclip 15 alone.
  • 50:21And you can see we're seeing PRS,
  • 50:23I'll tell you as someone who works
  • 50:25in this field of lung cancer to see
  • 50:27an immuno refractory patient respond,
  • 50:28you can count on one hand how often
  • 50:30that happens with some of these new agents.
  • 50:32So we're very excited about this.
  • 50:34We're trying to understand the
  • 50:35molecular mechanisms,
  • 50:36but we've had four responders now to
  • 50:38the combo and one to a single agent
  • 50:41and actually pictures are worth 1000 words.
  • 50:43So here's that patient who had got
  • 50:45the single agent liver lesion that's
  • 50:47responded and here are three examples
  • 50:49of patients who are responding to the combo.
  • 50:51So we are we are seeing activity here
  • 50:53and we're in the process of working
  • 50:54with next Cure and with other other
  • 50:56groups to decide what our next trial will be.
  • 50:59So I'm going to skip this.
  • 51:00I'm, I'm running, I was very ambitious.
  • 51:02I haven't given our live talk in many years,
  • 51:04OK.
  • 51:05But what I do want to tell you
  • 51:07about is just get to the end.
  • 51:08So what I've tried to show you today is
  • 51:11we're making progress in this disease.
  • 51:13It's really phenomenal progress.
  • 51:15It doesn't always seem like that
  • 51:16if you're on the inside,
  • 51:17but you know if you look back at
  • 51:19it from a 2030 year perspective,
  • 51:20we we we now have patients with lung cancer.
  • 51:22Ironically the patients who are
  • 51:24smokers who have many more mutations
  • 51:26probably have the chance of cure with
  • 51:29immunotherapy and as we move that
  • 51:31immunotherapy earlier maybe even more so.
  • 51:33But the targeted therapy produces
  • 51:34amazing benefit and quality of
  • 51:36life and if we use it earlier I
  • 51:38believe we could probably cure some
  • 51:40patients there as well.
  • 51:41The theme I think of of Yale as a
  • 51:43whole and certainly of the lung group
  • 51:45is that we used to call these Darts.
  • 51:46I haven't made the change the slide,
  • 51:49but our clinical trials team uses
  • 51:51the institutional science and our
  • 51:54industry collaborations to develop
  • 51:55trials that lead to advances grants
  • 51:57and we're feeding on that cycle
  • 51:59and we're building a team that's
  • 52:01focusing on lung cancer advances.
  • 52:03We have many other you know targets.
  • 52:07We're working with Aaron Rings,
  • 52:09Teen BP and the Melanoma group
  • 52:11and the lung group as well.
  • 52:12CD 93 is a target for vascular permeability.
  • 52:15We're starting to work with
  • 52:17here at Yale with Lee
  • 52:18Ping and other other targets.
  • 52:20And I didn't know Don was going to be here,
  • 52:21but you know we're certainly
  • 52:23interested in the flip as well.
  • 52:25We're doing trials.
  • 52:26This is an example of a biomarker adaptive
  • 52:28trial we did with with with Merck.
  • 52:29But I'd rather tell you about
  • 52:31the trial that we're developing
  • 52:32in the last minute called the I
  • 52:33Bulldog trial and Maina's here.
  • 52:35So Maina's been coordinating
  • 52:36with us doing a great job.
  • 52:37How are we going to do another
  • 52:39battle trial here at Yale?
  • 52:41What I would suggest is we have to
  • 52:43pull together and and do a trial
  • 52:44where we now take advantage of the
  • 52:46pathology that I've shown you today
  • 52:48of the science here at Yale and of
  • 52:50our ability to do clinical trials and
  • 52:52lead that next generation of studies.
  • 52:54And we are now looking for new ideas.
  • 52:57Here's,
  • 52:58here's our current idea that we've
  • 53:00been shopping around and we've
  • 53:01had meetings with three different
  • 53:03pharma groups in the last month
  • 53:04and they're all interested.
  • 53:05So we'll have to see who works with us.
  • 53:07We, we're really excited about this
  • 53:09and we're going to do real time tumor blood,
  • 53:11real time immune profiling.
  • 53:12We can do that here.
  • 53:14We can do it in a clear appropriate way.
  • 53:16And then we're going to initially
  • 53:18equally randomized patients to treatments.
  • 53:19But then once we learn about how
  • 53:21these biomarkers pretend response,
  • 53:22we're going to do a biomarker enrichment,
  • 53:24adaptive randomization and Steve
  • 53:26Miles very excited to do that with us.
  • 53:29Here's the team that's working on that,
  • 53:31just the core team,
  • 53:33but we'll be getting everyone
  • 53:34involved very soon.
  • 53:35So as I conclude,
  • 53:37can we cure metastatic lung cancer?
  • 53:39Yes, I couldn't have said that 10 years ago,
  • 53:42but only in some cases.
  • 53:44We have 12 plus year survivors
  • 53:46from our very first trials.
  • 53:48Treatment was well tolerated
  • 53:49and retreatment was possible.
  • 53:50I didn't show you that,
  • 53:51but sometimes you can retreat,
  • 53:52but we don't even know what
  • 53:53the markers are for that.
  • 53:54But the problem is we don't have
  • 53:56any way of knowing this in advance.
  • 53:57We've got to do more biomarker work.
  • 53:59So do we need to personalize immunotherapy?
  • 54:01Absolutely.
  • 54:02We spent 20 years personalizing
  • 54:05targeted therapy.
  • 54:05You'll you'll hear about that next June 10th,
  • 54:08but we're still not there yet.
  • 54:10We need biomarkers and better combos.
  • 54:12We need innovative trial designs.
  • 54:14But the future for this is now,
  • 54:16so last slides,
  • 54:17we need to personalize immunotherapy,
  • 54:19identify biomarkers and
  • 54:21improve combination therapy,
  • 54:22identify new targets and
  • 54:24rational combinations,
  • 54:24establish novel endpoints,
  • 54:26innovative trial designs.
  • 54:27We can do that here,
  • 54:29address mechanisms of resistance
  • 54:30and bring disease early.
  • 54:32It's sort of reads like the CCSG.
  • 54:35We can do it,
  • 54:35but I'm just my charge on this
  • 54:37first ground round to the Friday.
  • 54:39To the fellows, the scientists here,
  • 54:41the translational scientists,
  • 54:42everyone.
  • 54:42We're we're a continuum from
  • 54:44the clinic and the lab working
  • 54:46together to help the patient.
  • 54:47We need to develop drugs in real time,
  • 54:49and it's only going to be with science.
  • 54:50Ben Lewis here, He gave an amazing
  • 54:51talk the other day on a trial
  • 54:53that we're doing with ipilumab,
  • 54:54nivolumab biomarkers.
  • 54:55That's going to be the future.
  • 54:56But then to translate those into new studies,
  • 54:59So I'll just end with a picture.
  • 55:01So this is Ben's talk.
  • 55:02The other day we had 50 people
  • 55:03at a translational lung meeting.
  • 55:05Katie and Sarah have been organizing this.
  • 55:07This is how we're going to make progress.
  • 55:09We have to meet on a regular basis,
  • 55:10go over our science,
  • 55:11do as many Iits as we can.
  • 55:13This trial actually was a trial of ipilumab,
  • 55:15nivolumab that we went to meet
  • 55:17with Bristol-Myers at the Yale
  • 55:18Club about six years ago.
  • 55:19Several of us,
  • 55:20and we're not running it under our own ID,
  • 55:23but we're getting the samples.
  • 55:24We just got to get the samples
  • 55:25here and get the science here.
  • 55:26So we can make the next step.
  • 55:28So with that I'll just end
  • 55:29by saying save the date.
  • 55:31Katie and I and and the whole
  • 55:33committee are are gonna hold the
  • 55:34interest for meeting here next
  • 55:36June and we're gonna be celebrating
  • 55:3820 years of EGFR mutations.
  • 55:39The guest list is is everyone's
  • 55:41saying yes and we're gonna we're
  • 55:42the hotels will be full.
  • 55:43So with that off,
  • 55:44thank you very much.
  • 55:52It's it's the hour. But I'm happy
  • 55:53to take one or two questions
  • 55:54I I'm supposed to look online
  • 56:00a lot of people online.
  • 56:01Oh, here's a question.
  • 56:10Can you comment on giving the
  • 56:11therapy of the new, Yeah, so,
  • 56:12so new immunotherapy and the accurate
  • 56:14setting does seem to have some benefit.
  • 56:15The, the results are a bit mixed with
  • 56:18the tezalizumab in a trial known as
  • 56:20Keno 10 in the accurate setting in
  • 56:22patients that were PDL one more than 1%,
  • 56:24the hazard ratio is about point 6.7.
  • 56:26So there is, there is a benefit but when
  • 56:29if you look at those patients who were
  • 56:30PDL one negative in their initial sample,
  • 56:32there was no benefit at all.
  • 56:33Hembalizumab interestingly in a
  • 56:35very similar trial didn't didn't
  • 56:38see any biomarker prevalence but
  • 56:39they did see a benefit as well.
  • 56:41My sense is that neoadjuvant is
  • 56:43probably better because when you and
  • 56:45and it comes from Melanoma I see
  • 56:47Marcus shaking his head yes in in
  • 56:49Melanoma and in lung cancer you you
  • 56:50have a tumor and you have the lymph
  • 56:52nodes that are involved as well.
  • 56:54So if you use your your immunotherapy
  • 56:55in the Neoactivate setting you've got
  • 56:57the tumor in situ in in its micro
  • 56:58environment with its lymph nodes.
  • 57:00So you really get the entire T cell
  • 57:02micro environment I think you know affected.
  • 57:04So it's it's better.
  • 57:05The problem is we're only going
  • 57:06to be able to do neo activate on
  • 57:08a selected group of patients.
  • 57:09What we're seeing now is I'm sorry I
  • 57:11didn't have time to show those data,
  • 57:13but you know it works but you have
  • 57:14to pick carefully because you're
  • 57:16not going to really take someone
  • 57:18who's not a candidate for surgery
  • 57:19and bring them towards surgery.
  • 57:21So we have to be somewhat selective.
  • 57:22But at tumor board we'll look at a case,
  • 57:24we'll say this patient looks like
  • 57:26they're surgically resectable they
  • 57:27they can take the three months to get
  • 57:29the neoadjuvant therapy and and we're
  • 57:31treating those patients in that way.
  • 57:33Some of them might not be in that situation
  • 57:36And and chemo radiation David you know is,
  • 57:38is very is with immunotherapy
  • 57:40is also very beneficial.
  • 57:41So we have multiple options.
  • 57:43I'll leave you with this word.
  • 57:45Everyone should get immunotherapy
  • 57:46in some way if they can.
  • 57:48They,
  • 57:48the patients that don't get immunotherapy
  • 57:50would be ones who have autoimmunity or
  • 57:52some reason that they're intolerant
  • 57:54or certainly those with molecular
  • 57:56drivers because in those cases we know
  • 57:58immunotherapy doesn't seem to work as well.
  • 57:59But I'd say if there's any
  • 58:01hint of metastatic disease,
  • 58:02I try to find ways that I can
  • 58:04give immunotherapy to a patient.
  • 58:05Yes,
  • 58:05because
  • 58:08you
  • 58:10give her her expression so much more comment.
  • 58:13Any thoughts on have we target that or why
  • 58:17doesn't EGFR inhibition work for those?
  • 58:19Yeah, we we've tried that.
  • 58:20In fact that was the mark as we worked
  • 58:21at an MD Anderson and actually we worked
  • 58:23with Jose Bazaga on that many years ago.
  • 58:24We thought it would be EGFR
  • 58:26expression and and that is helpful.
  • 58:28You know, if you're using an
  • 58:29antibody that could be, you know,
  • 58:30if you're using satuximab in,
  • 58:31in certain tumors.
  • 58:32But but it really isn't, it's it's not,
  • 58:34it's not the absolute level
  • 58:36of EGFR but it's the quality,
  • 58:37it's it's whether it's being driven
  • 58:39by those mutations and you know the
  • 58:41TKI is you know where the you know if
  • 58:43you've got that addicted tumor that then
  • 58:45the TKI is will have that amazing effect.
  • 58:47But you know the expression can be
  • 58:49helpful maybe for AD CS right now,
  • 58:50now now there's a whole new now
  • 58:52that now that we're sort of at a
  • 58:54standstill with a new immunotherapy
  • 58:55resistant drugs and with new
  • 58:57targeted drugs for EGFR resistance.
  • 58:58We're using the address now with with,
  • 59:00with with with with with payloads.
  • 59:03So that might be an an area done since early
  • 59:08detection, this subject key
  • 59:10piece puzzle, what are your
  • 59:12thoughts on possible innovation?
  • 59:16Well certainly you know there's the the
  • 59:18easy one which is screening which now
  • 59:21with helical CTS and low dose CTS it
  • 59:23does pick lung cancers up earlier and
  • 59:24it's been shown to improve survival.
  • 59:26You know in the US only about 7% of patients
  • 59:29eligible for screening get screened.
  • 59:31You know the criteria were a bit
  • 59:33strict they've they've been reused a
  • 59:34bit but you know it has to have been
  • 59:36someone who's had a smoking history.
  • 59:37So of course it it it,
  • 59:38it doesn't take into account any of
  • 59:40these patients who are the never smokers
  • 59:42or the light smokers which are the ones
  • 59:44that have these different mutations.
  • 59:46Certainly you know looking in in
  • 59:48the DNA and and and and CTDNAI think
  • 59:51that's going to be the way to go.
  • 59:52We're already using that for minimal
  • 59:55residual disease both to determine
  • 59:57whether or not patients need more therapy
  • 59:59and and now of course we can look at
  • 01:00:01the quality of of what we're finding,
  • 01:00:02you know what are the new mutations,
  • 01:00:04those techniques are getting
  • 01:00:05more and more sensitive.
  • 01:00:06I'll tell you in the enduro trial
  • 01:00:08we only picked up you know post
  • 01:00:11resection a sample 1020% of the time.
  • 01:00:13So. So even though many of them,
  • 01:00:16many more of them probably
  • 01:00:17did have residual disease,
  • 01:00:18but it's getting more and more sensitive.
  • 01:00:19Now you asked about you know,
  • 01:00:20screening someone with a history
  • 01:00:22or family history or will we
  • 01:00:24start looking for for tumor DNA,
  • 01:00:26think we need a lot more work to do that.
  • 01:00:28But you know the techniques are
  • 01:00:29getting so much more sensitive.
  • 01:00:30Certainly if you know that someone
  • 01:00:31has a tumor or if they have Melanoma,
  • 01:00:33you know what the antigens are.
  • 01:00:34So you know what what panel to look
  • 01:00:36for and lung cancer which has so
  • 01:00:38many different you know types of
  • 01:00:40mutations there is what Charlie
  • 01:00:41Swanton is doing now and I would I
  • 01:00:43would put my money on his approach.
  • 01:00:44You know there would be spoke models
  • 01:00:46where you actually can sequence a tumor
  • 01:00:47get a panel of mutations and that
  • 01:00:49makes your your sensitivity much more,
  • 01:00:51much better
  • 01:00:54absolutely. And you know that's something
  • 01:00:56we've talked about and maybe I know
  • 01:00:58David and I have talked about it in
  • 01:00:59both David's you know we don't we don't
  • 01:01:01really have a liquid approach here.
  • 01:01:02So we need to think about how we're going to
  • 01:01:04maybe that's the way to jump jump forward.
  • 01:01:06You need AI, you need pre
  • 01:01:08competitive collaboration,
  • 01:01:09you need big data sets.
  • 01:01:11There's a meeting in two weeks at
  • 01:01:13the National Academy of Medicine
  • 01:01:14on public private partnerships
  • 01:01:15and you know data sharing.
  • 01:01:17We're going to have the editors of
  • 01:01:18some of the big journals there.
  • 01:01:19We're going to have people from
  • 01:01:21UK Welcome Trust from the NCI.
  • 01:01:23That's, that's what we need
  • 01:01:24to take these big approaches,
  • 01:01:25large sample sets that's love to talk
  • 01:01:28to you more about that get your ideas.
  • 01:01:30I think we better stop because it's late.
  • 01:01:32I'm starting to go a little over.
  • 01:01:33But thank you all for coming.
  • 01:01:34It's it's it's exhilarating to see
  • 01:01:35people in the talk to a live audience.
  • 01:01:37So. So thank you.